Pay pal

StaffsSW

Have another biscuit.

TurkishDelight

cyril82 wrote: »

Even businesses are exempt from distance selling regs if they auction their goods.

Terms that allow traders to:
.

Yes I know this. My fiance is on a part-time law course, and since it relates to our career we obviously payed attention to this bit of the law.

Paypal aren't traders- the seller is the trader.

cyril82

marleyboy wrote: »

Turkish; I still have not seen anyone else produce anything more constructive as proof, just a lot of snipes and "no no no's", unless you count that link as the best you can offer me, I am more inclined to believe Cyril is more correct on the matter, as at least he has produced something more constructive regarding proof.

I could be misinformed, but I am not sure your Swapitshop is anywhere near the kind of evidence I am looking for on the matter.

I'm sure you can offer me something other than a pointless "blah" on this subject, as I personally don't know who is right or wrong on this issue, unfortunately, as has been said before, all else is just mere words.

(Is it not still the government Mp's who claim they were all "acting within the rules"???)

The reason they all lack supporting documentation in their posts telling me i am wrong is because, they don’t have any, could that be because i am right maybe?

They just hate the fact i have come onto this board and dare disagree with them.

I was happy to just post my advice, complete with supporting text and links right along side their opinions on these boards and just let the readers decide who's advice to follow but every time i do the same old suspects jump on me labelling me an idiot, telling people to ignore me and that i am giving dangerously misleading advice, it is for that reason alone i have decided to highlight just who has a lack of actual knowledge in this way, as i have said, i can only take being labelled a fool by those with less knowledge than myself for so long.

StaffsSW

Gonna run outta biscuits soon.

cyril82

TurkishDelight wrote: »

Paypal aren't traders- the seller is the trader.

i hate it when people make "clever" comments when they are wrong, i just can't help feel embarrassed for them.

Paypal are traders, they trade in the provision of online payment processing.

Any company that operates for commercial purposes is a trader of one description or another, which is why the ministry of justice word the document that way?

i suppose your other half hasn't covered that bit yet?

cyril82

stevew8975 wrote: »

Gonna run outta biscuits soon.

Here's hoping......

TurkishDelight

cyril82 wrote: »

i hate it when people make "clever" comments when they are wrong, i just can't help feel embarrassed for them.

Paypal are traders, they trade in the provision of online payment processing.

Any company that operates for commercial purposes is a trader of one description or another, which is why the ministry of justice word the document that way?

i suppose your other half hasn't covered that bit yet?

They are traders, but they are not the trader covered by the statement you provided.

marleyboy

TurkishDelight wrote: »

Yes I know this. My fiance is on a part-time law course, and since it relates to our career we obviously payed attention to this bit of the law.

Paypal aren't traders- the seller is the trader.

This is fair enough, your fiance MIGHT well be on a law course, and you may well have read these bits more attentively, but you are still offering me nothing constructive other than mere words, I am not having a dig at you here, as I am inclined to believe what is posted as PROOF, not mere words that a poster CLAIMS to be true.

I dont know whether your partner studies law or not, and frankly it is not relevant to the evidence I see before me on this thread, if he does, then you should at least know a little more about where to find such proof and at the very least post these guidelines that contradict with Cyril.

So far, only Cyril seems to have done this, you STILL have not, so who am I more likely to accept knows what they are talking about? Someone who claims, or someone who proves?

marleyboy

stevew8975 wrote: »

Gonna run outta biscuits soon.

tuck in Steve mate

TurkishDelight

marleyboy wrote: »

This is fair enough, your fiance MIGHT well be on a law course, and you may well have read these bits more attentively, but you are still offering me nothing constructive other than mere words, I am not having a dig at you here, as I am inclined to believe what is posted as PROOF, not mere words that a poster CLAIMS to be true.

I dont know whether your partner studies law or not, and frankly it is not relevant to the evidence I see before me on this thread, if he does, then you should at least know a little more about where to find such proof and at the very least post these guidelines that contradict with Cyril.

So far, only Cyril seems to have done this, you STILL have not, so who am I more likely to accept knows what they are talking about? Someone who claims, or someone who proves?

What Cyril is quoting is the law, however it is badly out of context. He has previously !!!!!ed about paypal refunding buyers from his own account, and has stated prices that he sold things for (so I presume they were buy it nows) as a buisness.

I mentioned my fiance only to try and explain that I have read the DSRs.