We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
The Mystery Shopping thread - VII
Comments
-
LOL well I got them!!!:A The toughest form of mountain climbing, is getting out of the rut! :A0
-
Well done!!! Hope you enjoy the show... :cool:0
-
Who are FF?0
-
I've been doing this within reason. E.g. if I HAD to spend £10 but actually spent £80, then I put £10 as the expense. If I HAVE to spend £10, but I actually end up spending £11.95, because it's made up of lots of little things and I can't get it to exactly £10, then I put £11.95 as my expense. Basically, if I can't get it to exactly what it has to be without far too much fuss (which will make me stick out as MS), then I will claim it as expenses, within reason.I can't remember the exact wording of this but I remember SC and I a while back discussing it - I think we all agreed on the lower of what you spent and the reimbursed amount - UNLESS you're asked to spend more than the reimbursement as part of doing the job, so 3 scenarios:
A) Spent £10, reimbursed £30 - claim £10 as expense
Spent £30 (only HAD to spend £10), reimbursed £10 - claim £10 as expense
C) Spent £30 (HAD to spend £30), reimbursed £10 - claim £30 as expense0 -
I can't remember the exact wording of this but I remember SC and I a while back discussing it - I think we all agreed on the lower of what you spent and the reimbursed amount - UNLESS you're asked to spend more than the reimbursement as part of doing the job, so 3 scenarios:
A) Spent £10, reimbursed £30 - claim £10 as expense
Spent £30 (only HAD to spend £10), reimbursed £10 - claim £10 as expense
C) Spent £30 (HAD to spend £30), reimbursed £10 - claim £30 as expense
How does that logic follow?
Surely it'd be (using your letters)
a) Claim £0
b) Claim £0
C) Claim £20
??0 -
A) Spent £10, reimbursed £30 - claim £10 as expense No overall expense so claim £0
Spent £30 (only HAD to spend £10), reimbursed £10 - claim £10 as expense No overall expense (actually a profit of £20) so claim £0
C) Spent £30 (HAD to spend £30), reimbursed £10 - claim £30 as expense £20 overall expense (30-10=20) so claim £20.0 -
Ohhhhh I see!
There would be an expense, but there'd also be an income (which would offset it and make nil profit).
I was talking about the amount you include in your accounts as an expense, not the profit you'd make on it.
We were both right then!
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards