We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Mystery Shopping thread - VII
Comments
-
LOL well I got them!!!:A The toughest form of mountain climbing, is getting out of the rut! :A0
-
Well done!!! Hope you enjoy the show... :cool:0
-
Who are FF?0
-
I've been doing this within reason. E.g. if I HAD to spend £10 but actually spent £80, then I put £10 as the expense. If I HAVE to spend £10, but I actually end up spending £11.95, because it's made up of lots of little things and I can't get it to exactly £10, then I put £11.95 as my expense. Basically, if I can't get it to exactly what it has to be without far too much fuss (which will make me stick out as MS), then I will claim it as expenses, within reason.I can't remember the exact wording of this but I remember SC and I a while back discussing it - I think we all agreed on the lower of what you spent and the reimbursed amount - UNLESS you're asked to spend more than the reimbursement as part of doing the job, so 3 scenarios:
A) Spent £10, reimbursed £30 - claim £10 as expense
Spent £30 (only HAD to spend £10), reimbursed £10 - claim £10 as expense
C) Spent £30 (HAD to spend £30), reimbursed £10 - claim £30 as expense0 -
I can't remember the exact wording of this but I remember SC and I a while back discussing it - I think we all agreed on the lower of what you spent and the reimbursed amount - UNLESS you're asked to spend more than the reimbursement as part of doing the job, so 3 scenarios:
A) Spent £10, reimbursed £30 - claim £10 as expense
Spent £30 (only HAD to spend £10), reimbursed £10 - claim £10 as expense
C) Spent £30 (HAD to spend £30), reimbursed £10 - claim £30 as expense
How does that logic follow?
Surely it'd be (using your letters)
a) Claim £0
b) Claim £0
C) Claim £20
??0 -
A) Spent £10, reimbursed £30 - claim £10 as expense No overall expense so claim £0
Spent £30 (only HAD to spend £10), reimbursed £10 - claim £10 as expense No overall expense (actually a profit of £20) so claim £0
C) Spent £30 (HAD to spend £30), reimbursed £10 - claim £30 as expense £20 overall expense (30-10=20) so claim £20.0 -
Ohhhhh I see!
There would be an expense, but there'd also be an income (which would offset it and make nil profit).
I was talking about the amount you include in your accounts as an expense, not the profit you'd make on it.
We were both right then!
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards