Recession exacerbated by sSmoking Ban in public

StevieJ

Ignoring the pub issue, smokers more than pay for their cost to the state, in fact my guess is the more people you stop the more it will cost i.e.

They will live longer, state pension health care etc.

And/Or, they will still be a burden on the National Health
But, no tobacco taxes coming in :eek:

Snooze

macaque wrote: »

When I get to be Prime Minister, there will be a rule that requires smokers to stay inside for their cigarettes whilst sanctamonious do gooders are made to wait outside. Considerate non smokers will be welcome to stay inside. I will be implementing these arrangements entirely for health reasons. Not only will this protect the busy bodies from passive smoke but it will also shut their nagging up. Remember nagging causes stress and can have long term effects on health.

:rotfl: :T :rotfl: :T :rotfl:

Love it!

Rob

matbe

chucky wrote: »

i was being ironic - are you american?

You were not being ironic you were being a knobjockey as usual.

chucky

matbe wrote: »

You were not being ironic you were being a knobjockey as usual.

easy Matbe - have you an I ever discussed anything on here for you to be so complimentary...

as i said previously maybe you didn't understand...

if investment to an establishment was made to accomodate smokers was made it would either be by the establishment or through government funding.

i was being sarcastic (not ironic, maybe you didn't grasp that either) when i said the establishment should pay for it - if you bothered to read the end of my post you would have understood that this was being said tongue in cheak to Macaque.

and i also said that if the Government or Local Authority would pay for it - it wouldn't be right.

come on Matbe - chill, it's only an internet forum, don't take yourself so seriously

dervish

chucky wrote: »

easy Matbe - have you an I ever discussed anything on here for you to be so complimentary...

as i said previously maybe you didn't understand...

if investment to an establishment was made to accomodate smokers was made it would either be by the establishment or through government funding.

i was being sarcastic (not ironic, maybe you didn't grasp that either) when i said the establishment should pay for it - if you bothered to read the end of my post you would have understood that this was being said tongue in cheak to Macaque.

and i also said that if the Government or Local Authority would pay for it - it wouldn't be right.

come on Matbe - chill, it's only an internet forum, don't take yourself so seriously

you should perhaps take your own advice.

also you often feel the need to insult tme in nasty ways.

pickles110564

dervish wrote: »

you should perhaps take your own advice.

also you often feel the need to insult tme in nasty ways.

When you are a racist like you are what else do you expect to recieve?
You are a very nasty piece of work.

pickles110564

Snooze wrote: »

:rotfl: :T :rotfl: :T :rotfl:

Love it!

Rob

Go back to sleep.

dervish

pickles110564 wrote: »

When you are a racist like you are what else do you expect to recieve?
You are a very nasty piece of work.

Libellous remarks and personal attacks towards other members are NOT ALLOWED on this site. I suggest you delete those remarks or someone will report you...

chucky

dervish wrote: »

Libellous remarks and personal attacks towards other members are NOT ALLOWED on this site. I suggest you delete those remarks or someone will report you...

Dervish - just to be clear just in case you didn't understand Pickles post.
You are a racist and the extremely xenophobic - it's not libel when it's fact

dervish

chucky wrote: »

Dervish - just to be clear just in case you didn't understand Pickles post.
You are a racist and the extremely xenophobic - it's not libel when it's fact

It is a personal attack and it is highly defamatory - NOT ALLOWED on this site.