We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Zanussi Integrated dishwasher - £94 delivered @ B&Q Possible misprice
Options
Comments
-
Brilliant! keep going. Cannot wait for the result. Good or bad more power to you for trying.Be ALERT - The world needs more LERTS0
-
B and q have copied the whole thread so it doesn't matter. They are relying on other persons threads which quote text I deleted to put before a judge not knowing the poster can amend the copied text.0
-
TBeckett100 wrote: »B and q doesn't matter. They are relying on other persons text.
A point well made.0 -
I'm following progress too, good luck. (You want to print your post above to take with you)AKA: PC
...
Rest in Peace Fred the Maddest Muppet in Heaven0 -
Iknow of other cases in the system so I would have thought a blanket defense would have been made not a tailored dig for dirt. I think they will see me in court which I want to clear this up for all to know outcomE0
-
Surely to goodness though B&Q would realise that TBeckett100 could be anyone posting with the username, not necessarily the same person who has lodged a claim against then. The internet is inherently an unsafe environment. How many John Smiths ordered I wonder :P
Using past posts on here does not prove the claimant and poster are the same person. Their defence will be laughed out of court on that basis alone
Good luck court goers!
:cool:0 -
Surely to goodness though B&Q would realise that TBeckett100 could be anyone posting with the username, not necessarily the same person who has lodged a claim against then. The internet is inherently an unsafe environment. How many John Smiths ordered I wonder :P
Using past posts on here does not prove the claimant and poster are the same person. Their defence will be laughed out of court on that basis alone
Good luck court goers!
:cool:
Good to hear professional legal opinion on the matter
ever heard of an IP address dear?"Sealed Pot challenge" member No.1378 -
Target = £300 by 5 December 2011
0 -
I think its more likely the claim will be laughed out of court than the defence. Lets face it.The Head Honcho (does very little work)0
-
mattwallisuk wrote: »I think its more likely the claim will be laughed out of court than the defence. Lets face it.
Why are you so keen on knocking the efforts made?
Were you never told 'if you cannot say anything nice, say nothing.'
I for one do hope that the people suing get something.
Cannot see the point in knocking someone else's efforts.Be ALERT - The world needs more LERTS0 -
Not knocking anyones efforts, just having a bit of a laugh. It was quote of the year for these forums sueing for "loss of bargain".The Head Honcho (does very little work)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards