GCs PCs - DO NOT BUY FROM [Removed]

partner03

I am no expert but if your company is still trading which you must be doing because you say you are selling the old stock off (and of course selling gift cards) how can you not be liable for claims for money against you.
And I have a ltd company and I am still personally liable for any debts the company runs up.
Anyway I not supprised you can't recall Matteus240 and you have obviously got many unsatisfied customers

Money_Grabber13579

partner03 wrote: »

I am no expert but if your company is still trading which you must be doing because you say you are selling the old stock off (and of course selling gift cards) how can you not be liable for claims for money against you.
And I have a ltd company and I am still personally liable for any debts the company runs up.
Anyway I not supprised you can't recall Matteus240 and you have obviously got many unsatisfied customers

No, that's exactly the thing with a limited company. The directors aren't liable for any more than they're original share capital. However if there is fraud or embezzlement involved, like it would appear to be the case, then the directors can do a sizeable jail term.

trisontana

Another correction, he is no longer selling gift-cards.

MoneySavingNovice

[QUOTE=[Name_removed_by_Forum_Team] {Removed by Forum team};25333625]......All judgements are applied for a set aside which means you no longer have a judgement against GC's PC's and thus cannot claim so.

If we agree to any judgement, we will of course pay any money due as a process of closing the company.......[/QUOTE]

[Name removed by Forum Team] please clarify this for me.

I'm reading this that:-

a) In all cases you have applied for the judgements to be set aside
(Seem reasonable to me assuming you have a valid argument)

b) As you have applied for set-aside there is no longer a judgement against GC's PC's
(Only true if the application for set-aside is upheld)

c) GC's PC's need to agree to a Judgement
(not true a Judgement is binding until set-aside by the courts)

d) You are only re-paying creditors as part of the winging down of the company
(worrying if true!)

e) You agree that the name of you company is GC's PC's and not the GLC Group!

BASFORDLAD

This gets interesting...

Stephen_Webber

MoneySavingNovice wrote: »

b) As you have applied for set-aside there is no longer a judgement against GC's PC's
(Only true if the set-aside is granted)

My understanding of this (I am not a lawyer) is that the set-aside is basically a request to have the case re-heard, it doesn't mean that the defendant is necessarily innocent.

underlay_guru

[QUOTE=[Name_removed_by_Forum_Team] {Removed by Forum team};25333625] matteus240 i have no information on who you are. all county court judgements or small claims would have to be in the name of GC's PC's and not me for obvious reasons. [/QUOTE]

...but your website states your company is 'GLC Group Ltd' ([Name removed by Forum Team] )......May I remind you that it is a criminal offence to distance sell with false/invalid company details.....whoops, just incriminated yourself there, young [Name removed by Forum Team] !


[QUOTE=[Name_removed_by_Forum_Team] {Removed by Forum team};25333625] We know of no-one who we owe over £800 and if there was such a case, our solicitor would be dealing with it. [/QUOTE]
Not Rudds solicitors by chance, is it? After all, Rudds Solicitors are based at 350 London Road, Westcliff on Sea... The solicitor should have record of ALL your complaints....

trisontana

He is also breaking the law by not submitting his accounts to Companies House:-

GC'S PC'S LIMITED
GC'S PC'S LIMITED
350 LONDON ROAD
WESTCLIFF ON SEA
ESSEX
SS0 7JL
Company No. 06541505



Status: Active - Proposal to Strike off
Date of Incorporation: 20/03/2008

Country of Origin: United Kingdom
Company Type: Private Limited Company
Nature of Business (SIC(03)):
None Supplied
Accounting Reference Date: 31/03
Last Accounts Made Up To: (NO ACCOUNTS FILED)
Next Accounts Due: 20/01/2010
Last Return Made Up To:
Next Return Due: 17/04/2009 OVERDUE

By my reckoning [Name removed by Forum Team] presently owes Companies house £750. After the middle of October this will increase to £1500.

MoneySavingNovice

Stephen_Webber wrote: »

My understanding of this (I am not a lawyer) is that the set-aside is basically a request to have the case re-heard, it doesn't mean that the defendant is necessarily innocent.

Yes you are correct - that's what I had in mind when writing the post - corrected above - thanks for pointing it out!

dinah_greek

Hi .. Companies House say no money involved but GCs PCs didn't file its annual returns.. so CH has moved to strike GCs PCs off. However once this happens there is no company - so any creditors have no one to chase. If anyone such as matteous has an outstanding claim against GCs PCs they should write to Companies House asking for a postponement and to say why. You can write, fax or email the Dissolution Department at Companies House eg email is [EMAIL="enquiries@companieshouse.gov.uk"]enquiries@companieshouse.gov.uk[/EMAIL]
This link may be useful if anyone believes they are owed money http://www.companieshouse.gov.uk/about/gbhtml/gbw2.shtml
Dinah Greek
News editor
Computeractive