A new Redundancy board on MSE?

mewbie_2

Dithering_Dad wrote: »

Thanking policy

Just to be crystal clear. I thanked 1echidna but not DD. Why? Because I felt that there was a subtext to the DD post which I didn't fully agree with.

I shall be taking notes of any thanks I get for this and comparing it to the other thanks on this thread. Any conclusions will be posted in next months issue of "I'm a bit of a thanker".

Pobby

Thanks mewbie. Off to Thanks R Us now.

carolt

mewbie wrote: »

Just to be crystal clear. I thanked 1echidna but not DD. Why? Because I felt that there was a subtext to the DD post which I didn't fully agree with.

Absolutely - as expressed above, I don't expect the new board would encounter problems AND I don't think mse currently has a big problem with unpleasant posters.

carolt

Dithering_Dad wrote: »

I checked and checked and could not find a post where I used the word 'Scadenfreunde'.

You are so right.

OK, schadenfreunde then, I counted it at least twice.

My error was a typo.

Yours?

Dithering_Dad

Thanks Mewbie, Pobby and everyone else. Thanks Everyone.

Dithering_Dad

carolt wrote: »

You are so right.

OK, schadenfreunde then, I counted it at least twice.

My error was a typo.

Yours?

lol, I love it when I see someone try and be a pedant and correct another poster's spelling or grammar and then in doing so, make a mistake themselves.

How annoying it must have been for you when realise you'd screwed up your attempt at humour to the point where you become the butt of your own joke!!! :rotfl:

Dithering_Dad

Dithering_Dad wrote: »

Thanks Mewbie, Pobby and everyone else. Thanks Everyone.

Incidently, forum members on other boards mock the HPC board because of the excessive use of the 'thanks' button. I try and only thank people who thank me or make any sort of point that I agree or disagree with. Thanks guys.

Gotta go and click a few 'thanks' buttons. be back later.

mewbie_2

Dithering_Dad wrote: »

Incidently, forum members on other boards mock the HPC board because of the excessive use of the 'thanks' button.

You know DD, as far as I am concerned, they can all just mock off.

carolt

Dithering_Dad wrote: »

lol, I love it when I see someone try and be a pedant and correct another poster's spelling or grammar and then in doing so, make a mistake themselves.

How annoying it must have been for you when realise you'd screwed up your attempt at humour to the point where you become the butt of your own joke!!! :rotfl:

Not at all, I find the joke highly amusing.

Still waiting. Mine was a typo - you, on the other hand, seemed to imagine that schadenfreunde (have I got your spelling right this time? ) is a type of person.

Clearly more than a typo.

Can't wait for your analysis of how !!!!!! is a "pleasure taken from observing the misery of another"!

Obviously, I think !!!!!! is 'a pleasure', as does his mum, no doubt, but we weren't aware till now that you did too.

Dithering_Dad

carolt wrote: »

Obviously, I think !!!!!! is 'a pleasure', as does his mum, no doubt, but we weren't aware till now that you did too.

I'm sure you do carol, especially after I read all those allegations forum members were making about you two swapping 'saucy' PMs. :rotfl:

I'm not into that sort of thing myself, being happily married, but I'd imagine it'd be a bit pleasureable if you're desperate.