Unenforceable Credit Agreements

PROLIANT

never-in-doubt wrote: »

Nah cos he was taking a month to get over his shame :eek:

I have no shame, nor do I care what feedback I receive either, no point in jumping on the bandwagon just to stay in the "click".

never-in-doubt

Ahh, Proliant there too: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/member.php?u=201501

currently viewing consumer forums......

AverageJoe_4

alls well that ends well - no one knows who is typing on the pc - could be kids, drink people, general pi-ss takers winding people up..

AJ

PROLIANT

never-in-doubt wrote: »

whats your username? Please do share and fair play.

So can I ask you one question, please be honest:

"do you agree with the principles within CAG, i.e. that they are there to try and avoid payment by realising flaws in laws"? Or is that morally against your values, in totality?

Your views would be appreciated Mr P.

I have found the odd "few" post's that I find interesting, however the majority of the data on there is just folk jumping on bandwagons and mouthing off because they have failed to manage their finances properly ergo getting in to trouble with DCA's et al.
However, maybe a "fresh" approach is needed - some re-education, a different point of view rather than just following the lead of the biggest gob on the forum.

never-in-doubt

Well, looks like nothing changes.

Proliant has posted in one thread. Someone uploaded a CCA and asked if it was in fact one or an application. The reply from Mr P...

"Yep, that looks like a credit agreement. "

Link here: #347 (permalink)

AverageJoe_4

Everyone is after a quick buck, it just depends how quick and how big. When the pressure is on (ie this financial climate) desperate measures are needed.

How desperate are the banks getting lately - there are trying to stop people from coming out off their fixed rate mortgages and onto a lower one - but it's ok to finish a fixed rate and go on to a higher one though...?? Oh yes..

AverageJoe_4

Saw that agreement upload. I think all the red paint spilliage would void it though wouldn't it? :-/

AJ

never-in-doubt

AverageJoe wrote: »

Saw that agreement upload. I think all the red paint spilliage would void it though wouldn't it? :-/

AJ

hahaah - silly sod. :beer:

the point is that Cap1 send applications that act as CCA at the same time so they are different, thats why most of cap1 claims are lost by them and won by the consumer (claimant)!

gomer

AverageJoe wrote: »

I think cashpig was defending himself - he never made an atack on someone from the post ive read without that someone saying something to him.

you've made yourself look like a wan-ker by volunteering that comment

Some of the comments he made to people who did not even speak to him were totally unacceptable and were not called for, like telling people that they don't deserve to have children just because they didn't agree with his opinion. Interesting that you chose not to see his attacks on other people. *wink*

I think only one person came out of that looking like a wan-ker & it certainly wasn't me, though your unfaultering support for someone you didn't even know because you didn't join until after he left is most admirable, if not predictable seeing as you are a little better aquainted than you make out.

AverageJoe_4

LOL *oinks*