ICE SAVE - 2nd E Mail Received

Plasticman

NonGeographicalMan wrote: »

And is it not against the forum rules to keep repeatedly posting the same text in more than one thread, especially when the purpose of that action is deliberately malicious and inflammatory as yours quite clearly is.

Why do you pose as a new forum member when your specialist cat in a hammock logo clearly suggests you are a very old hand at baiting other forum members for your own perverse satisfaction.

Can you please remove the chip from your shoulder and leave this thread for relevant posts. :rolleyes:

NonGeographicalMan

Paul_Varjak wrote: »

Winging and whining achieves nothing!

Payment of the missing interest on which I have not won but lost is clearly my objective.

I'm genuinely sorry you lost money with Exeter Fund Managers but you can't begin to compare this kind of Investment Trust with a cash deposit bank account.

NonGeographicalMan

Plasticman wrote: »

Can you please remove the chip from your shoulder and leave this thread for relevant posts. :rolleyes:

Well if tuggy12, Chameleon and a couple of their other sidekicks would also desist from their deliberate flaming then I would happily do so.

NonGeographicalMan

casabiosca wrote: »

Following this forum for quite a while, I consider Non Geographical Man is about the only contributor able to put together a coherent English sentence. More than that, he makes sense.

Thanks casabiosca.

Sadly I fear that the excessively well paid hordes of builders and white van drivers who also clearly had their large piles of liquid cash deposited with Icesave are unable to comprehend a well put together logical argument.

Their thoughts only seem to run as far as "well I got most of me money back mate and so ain't too worried about that funny old interest stuff".

greigster

casabiosca wrote: »

Following this forum for quite a while, I consider Non Geographical Man is about the only contributor able to put together a coherent English sentence. More than that, he makes sense.
Attack me too if you like for supporting someone who the majority clearly do not like, but you would be wasting your time as I don't care and can't be bothered to retaliate. I have better things to do with my time.

Is casabiosca non geocrapicals mum?

Norman-B

NonGeographicalMan wrote: »

Payment of the missing interest on which I have not won but lost is clearly my objective.

I sincerely wish you well in your quest to obtain the lost interest but I doubt you will get it. Just my opinion. Now the difference between you and I seems to be that you are unhappy at what you see as a wrong done to you and I am just relieved to be getting my lifes savings back. Perhaps I am easily pleased but after the scare I (and others) had, I'm just happy to be in a similar position (in a few days) to the one I was in during the first week of Oct.
Nothing personal in my replies, I assure you.

bjorn_again

greigster wrote: »

Is casabiosca non geocrapicals mum?

Miaooow

NonGeographicalMan

greigster wrote: »

Is casabiosca non geocrapicals mum?

No I have no idea who casabiosca is other than an Icesave investor with a clear and logical mind who was sufficiently annoyed by the ill educated mob like behaviour of tuggy, Chameleon and their cronies that they bothered to join the forum to make their view known.

bjorn_again

NonGeographicalMan wrote: »

No I have no idea who casabiosca is other than an Icesave investor with a clear and logical mind who was sufficiently annoyed by the ill educated mob like behaviour of tuggy, Chameleon and their cronies that they bothered to join the forum to make their view known.

Come on NGM, give us a break and stop sounding so pompous. We all have a different take on the Icesave issue. There is'nt a right or a wrong point of view, but at lease accept that there exists a different one to your own.

NonGeographicalMan

Norman-B wrote: »

I sincerely wish you well in your quest to obtain the lost interest but I doubt you will get it

But that is what the FSCS is relying on to do us out of our interest after October 7th. Either the FSCS is there to compensate people for the losses caused by a bank failing or it isn't. If it doesn't cover interest at a reasonable market rate after the failure up to pay out and can take up to 3 months to pay out that is a clear and obvious failing in the nature of the scheme. The fact that they are paying people out on dates that may be as much as two months apart (allowing for the manual paper claims for those who did not have linked bank accounts etc) only makes that all the worse and more unjust and inequitable. They could have paid everyone on the same day by cheque. Its been done loads of times almost overnight on refund cheques on the major privatisations for millions of investors.

I have a particularly low opinion of its overpaid Chairman and Chief Executive who have not even bothered to get a secretary to send a holding email in response to the points I raised in my email of over a week and a half ago.

This compares with Sandra Quinn of APACS (regularly interviewed on BBC Radio 4 Moneybox about bank payment and clearing issues) who lists her direct line number on the APACS website and who I was directly able to call last Friday and ask her whether payments from Icesave/FSCS's bankers (Barclays) to my NatWest account were likely to covered by the new same day FastPay systems introduced by the 13 major clearing banks. This appeared relevant as I had a choice between sending my compensation to either my linked NatWest or Nationwide accounts. Ms Quinn was very helpful and made no effort to suggest a member of the public should not be calling her and we must have spoken for at least 5 minutes.

However it now turns out that despite my bank and Barclays both using Fastpay that Newcastle Building Society has asked for old normal BACS slowpay to be used in order to save the government a few more days interest on borrowing the money to pay us out.:mad: