We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
50% drops by 2011
Comments
- 
            neverdespairgirl wrote: »In London, at least, that simply didn't happen in any significant way in the early to mid 1990s. The market bumped along tamely for ages.
tend to agree here - there were a number of people who did invest their cash in property in the medium term but for at least 4 years it was quite flat.0 - 
            
Cash is king now. Those who have it or can get finance won't be over-paying for anything. Aberdeen and near enough everywhere else is going to crash back to 1992 prices.
You need locking up and the key throwing away.
Either that or a straight jacket:D
I bought in June 2007 and can sell my property now for £35k more. Not fiction, fact;) Give you your due though it's probably dropped about £5k from its peak back in June when i had the place valued, that to me is about a 2% drop.
All this oil money, cheap housing and £50k+ salaries does the world of good up here;)
I dont think there is a better area in the UK to live for salary and affordability purposes. No point earning £100k in Central London when 1 bed flats cost £500k:D
1992:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: Some of you are taking things way too far
Dopester...Are you not the chap that lives in a poverty stricken Glasgow council estate? An estate that resembles that of Beirut near Govan? Granted, you may well see 1992 levels return there. Buy a whole street for about £5k because no-one sane enough wants to live there
                        0 - 
            Welcome back mitchaa, :j
-2% eh?
Seems others officially calculate Aberdeen took a -7% hit in the 3rd quarter. That £35K equity is rapidly being eaten in to.Meanwhile, Aberdeen recorded the greatest reversal in fortunes. The Granite City, which had previously recorded the highest prices in Scotland, has now been knocked from the top position.
In the second quarter this year, house prices in Aberdeen rose by 3 per cent year-on-year, but in the third quarter the average price in the city dropped by 7 per cent.
http://news.scotsman.com/scotland/Scottish-housing-sector-joins-the.4555236.jp0 - 
            Welcome back mitchaa, :j
-2% eh?
Seems others officially calculate Aberdeen took a -7% hit in the 3rd quarter. That £35K equity is rapidly being eaten in to.
http://news.scotsman.com/scotland/Scottish-housing-sector-joins-the.4555236.jp
Actually, you are incorrect again.
The figures are taken from nationwide and there was not a 7% drop in Q3 2008. Actually there was a 2.4% drop in Q3 2008
What happened was that there was a 6.9% drop YoY in Q3 2008
Incidently, in Q3 2007 there was a 35% rise
So in short, since Q3 2006, prices rose 35% and then lowered by 6.9% resulting in the average property price according to Nationwide being 25% higher in Q3 2008 than they were in Q3 2006.
As mitchaa bought in June 2007, comparing Q2 2007 with Q3 2008 his property theoretically is roughly the same if not a little higher
http://www.nationwide.co.uk/hpi/historical/q2_2007.pdf
http://www.nationwide.co.uk/hpi/historical/q3_2008.pdf:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 - 
            Its not like they weren't warned...
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/latestnews/-Recession-threat-Bank-of.4032746.jp
And won't to be helped by;
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/7672431.stm
either.
I think 1992 is a tad negative, mind!0 - 
            
 - 
            Personally, get saving, wait for the bottom then buy and buy 2 if you can0
 - 
            You need locking up and the key throwing away.
Either that or a straight jacket:D
I bought in June 2007 and can sell my property now for £35k more. Not fiction, fact;) Give you your due though it's probably dropped about £5k from its peak back in June when i had the place valued, that to me is about a 2% drop.
All this oil money, cheap housing and £50k+ salaries does the world of good up here;)
I dont think there is a better area in the UK to live for salary and affordability purposes. No point earning £100k in Central London when 1 bed flats cost £500k:D
1992:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: Some of you are taking things way too far
Dopester...Are you not the chap that lives in a poverty stricken Glasgow council estate? An estate that resembles that of Beirut near Govan? Granted, you may well see 1992 levels return there. Buy a whole street for about £5k because no-one sane enough wants to live there
I am very interested to know what everyone else thinks about your claim that you could sell you house now for 35K more than you bought it for in June 07. Obviously we all haven't seen your house but the way things are looking for the property market know one really needs to.
I admit if its something very special that super rich would like to own and you bought it way way below market value, then yes even now in these times you may find someone who has enough equity elsewhere to actually get a mortgage approved. But then again why would said person want to when all the smart people know we have a long way to fall yet.
I'm sorry but your a living in a dream world and you can go on thinking you may find someone who is like you (not understanding whats happening around you) to buy your house but the facts are houses just are not selling right now, even at hugely reduced prices we have the lowest figures of sales going through since colour TV was invented.
So anyway yes I disagree with your statement that you claim is fact not fiction, I'm sure other will give their opinion..............0 - 
            novazombie wrote: »Iaround you) So anyway yes I disagree with your statement that you claim is fact not fiction, I'm sure other will give their opinion..............
Delusional. A xDon't believe everything you think.
Blessed are the cracked...for they are the ones who let in the light. A x0 - 
            novazombie wrote: »So anyway yes I disagree with your statement that you claim is fact not fiction, I'm sure others will give their opinion..............
There is no way ANYONE can sell a house for that much more than they bought it for at the top in 2007.
Did you get mistaken and mean to say you can sell your house for only 35K less than you bought it for at the top? That wouldnt be too bad compared to what you could get for it in 1 or 2 yrs time.0 
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
 - 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
 - 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
 - 454.3K Spending & Discounts
 - 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
 - 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
 - 177.5K Life & Family
 - 259.1K Travel & Transport
 - 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
 - 16K Discuss & Feedback
 - 37.7K Read-Only Boards