We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Please boycott Metro Hotel in Woking - read for more details
Comments
-
Erm, you've not explained that the soldier stereotype is a misrepresentation. You've admitted it's true, here, in post #44:
Not necessarily, no. If a man walks into a bank wearing a balaclava and carrying a shotgun, you are going to think the bank is about to be robbed. The man hasn't actually done anything except walk into a bank, and for all you know he may just want to sort out his overdraft, yet you are predicting his future behaviour on the basis of what previous people who walk into banks wearing balaclavas and carrying shotguns have done. That's discrimination (well, actually it's prejudice but this whole thread has used discrimination as a catch-all term). And I'm sure banks have a policy of not allowing people to enter their establishments wearing balaclavas and carrying shotguns. That's discrimination. Are you going to argue that banks should not prevent people from walking into their branches carrying shotguns and wearing balaclavas because it's fundamentally wrong?
Forget the word judge one on the behaviour of others and replace to penalise. Do you not think that is wrong!!!
Do you have any empathy? It seems to me that you probably have very limited life experience, nevermind you will get some along the way especially with your attitude.0 -
Tojo_Ralph wrote: »I doubt I could have explained myself any better...... If you missed the point, so be it.
You are welcome to yet another one of your opinions based on zero fact.
It is about now that I really do think that you need to take a long hard look at your combat johnny diatribe and realise that you are responding to comments that were never made.
The trouble very often with civilians is they have no idea how the world really works, and the consequenses of seemingly unimportant trivial predjudice/ discrimination. If you had been to Northern Ireland, Kosovo, Bosnia, Sierra Leone, Iraq, Afghanistan, DR Congo, Rwanda, Uganda, Chad, as I have you may understand the importance of defending simple freedoms that are largely taken for granted.
Once you let these freedoms become diluted its a slippery slope.
One day you may experience such predjudice I just hope it isnt too late by then.0 -
bargainbarmy wrote: »God, you're weird.......
What is it with you? Why don't you just get over yourself......wake up. It was a no news day and the media were grasping at straws. It doesn't matter if they refused the soldier a room. It happens all the time to young scally looking lads. Just go and get your issues sorted out and stop distorting this post!!! !!!!!!, I am so bored !!!
Yes but he isnt a young scally lad is he. He is a serving member of the British Army who deserves respect.
And thanks for your concern I have been treated for PTSD and am feeling much better these days.
Its about a principle its not really such a big deal to have to sleep in your car, he is a soldier im sure he has spent many uncomfortable nights in places you wouldnt dream of being in, but the point is the prejudice. Do you Get it? probably not.0 -
-
Any hotel owner has the right to refuse a customer. I don't know why this owner does not wish to have military personnel staying at his hotel, but if this is so then so be it.
Maybe he has had bad experiences in the past. There are cases where military personnel returning from Iraq or Afghanistan have behaved in a brutal manner towards their family and members of the public. Probably not their fault after possibly being trained to be brutal against their occupiers.
Quickfire123 here, does it not seem a bit suspect that bagold is defending this group of monkey's?????
And his joining date is September 08?
Obviously they are just trying to give excuses to cover their !!!! if people decide to bombard them with crap which they deserve!!!:mad:0 -
Paul_Herring wrote: »How elitist.
Not Elitist. Just true.
Do you have a problem with me expressing that opinion. however unsavoury it is my experience being at the sharp end makes you very much more aware of the reasons you got there, and the decisions made by people who have no idea of the consequenses.0 -
Im sacking all the afrocarrabeans working in my company because none of them use soap!!!0
-
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
