CSA- mother not spending money on child

kelloggs36

seven-day-weekend wrote: »

I personally think that is unfair.

I don't - maintenance is for the day to day maintenance for the children which the parents provide - children will squander their money on items of luxury like cds, make up etc and not on essentials. That is why it is not allowed.

kelloggs36

Loopygirl has NEVER come across bitter and twisted about anything she has posted about. She is fair and consistent. If she is incorrect, she apologises. Nobody on here has posted anything which the OP shouldn't have read - it was perfectly fair advice. Iloveme, if you don't like Loopy's posts, just ignore them - personally I can't see anything wrong with them.

Slapps

iloveme wrote: »

i am entitled to my own opinion,loopgirl seems bitter and twisted,prob because she doesnt get her csa money and is jealous.you seem to hide behind a pc yourself.

ere loopy is this ya ex hun lol.
too me it sounds as if this person is bitter and twisted against you. i think you have found yourself a post stalker, you lucky thing, I'm jealous now lol:rotfl:

frugallass

iloveme wrote: »

ignore loopy girl shes just a nut job and busy body who thinks they know it all!

What a terribly immature post - for your information iloveme Loopy Girl is a very helpful and knowledgeable person and I can only think of nice things to say about her.

Loopy_Girl

Slapps wrote: »

ere loopy is this ya ex hun lol.
too me it sounds as if this person is bitter and twisted against you. i think you have found yourself a post stalker, you lucky thing, I'm jealous now lol:rotfl:

Yeah I'm right up there with the Beckhams me!!!!:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: Me and my bitter and twisted mind and my bodyguards!!!!!!!!!!!:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

enemes

frugallass wrote: »

What a terribly immature post - for your information iloveme Loopy Girl is a very helpful and knowledgeable person and I can only think of nice things to say about her.

eh? And to think that iloveme has just Thanked You for that ... me think someone is trolling here.

enemes

Slapps wrote: »

ere loopy is this ya ex hun lol.
too me it sounds as if this person is bitter and twisted against you. i think you have found yourself a post stalker, you lucky thing, I'm jealous now lol:rotfl:

erm ... nah! I'm her stalker!

Paparika

CSA are only a collection agency so they cannot dictate to the ex partner on how the money is spent.

My ex claimed that the £5.00 a week he paid wasn't going on his son, too right it didn't it never covered anything,

I spent my own money on our son so the £5.00 would get swallowed up in bills.

I'm the one who paid for clothing, food, school trips, school uniforms, holidays, treats etc and i still do.

What does his father do.. oh yes still pubbing and clubbing and buying very expensive tv's to keep up with the Joneses

jpmummy

but when you are paying a large amount of money to someone who has "encouraged" their offspring to stay in further education so that they can avoid working and they have NEVER WORKED and they are 36 years old and claim "tax credits" yet driving round in a newish car and going on expensive hols etc it is clearly not going to maintain the child/young adult, she even intends to go down this route with her youngest 16 (with someone else) and bleed every penny out of him too! Child maintenance I don't think so, lazy, calculated yes! and the CSA says they have no income

Zara33

jpmummy wrote: »

but when you are paying a large amount of money to someone who has "encouraged" their offspring to stay in further education so that they can avoid working and they have NEVER WORKED and they are 36 years old and claim "tax credits" yet driving round in a newish car and going on expensive hols etc it is clearly not going to maintain the child/young adult, she even intends to go down this route with her youngest 16 (with someone else) and bleed every penny out of him too! Child maintenance I don't think so, lazy, calculated yes! and the CSA says they have no income

What!?! so your saying by encouraging the child to stay on at school and get a good education is a bad thing :rolleyes: as for the holidays and car perhaps the PWC is up to their eyeballs in debt.