We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Cheques move a step closer to extinction

Options
17810121315

Comments

  • never-in-doubt
    never-in-doubt Posts: 20,613 Forumite
    jambosans wrote: »
    Apologies if you took it the wrong, I will converse with you on the matter no longer, only if you choose to discuss the OP I may respond.

    LOL, well that's good of you isn't it? If you don't like what you're reading them don't come and post on this thread!

    You'll never force your ideals down our necks cos some of us actually prefer cheques or at least like and have a use for them! I used to pay my old landlord by cheque every month, it suited us both as she came to do an inspection and if we were both happy i'd pay her the rent. It worked a dream for me.

    Also, dole still pay using giro's and tax refunds are generally paid using cheques. Maybe when the largest two gvt depts stop using them, then the public will start to listen! :beer: I always pet for my dog kennel and the vet by cheque, come to think of it I still go through a book every 3 months! This must mean I use them a lot!?!
    :o 2010 - year of the troll :o

    Niddy - Over & Out :wave:
  • Inactive
    Inactive Posts: 14,509 Forumite
    LOL, well that's good of you isn't it? If you don't like what you're reading them don't come and post on this thread!

    Careful NID, or Jambosans will try to close the thread again..:rotfl:

    I just paid my window cleaner with a cheque....slap on the wrist for that....no doubt.:D
  • jambosans
    jambosans Posts: 1,493 Forumite
    edited 30 June 2009 at 1:25PM
    LOL, well that's good of you isn't it? If you don't like what you're reading them don't come and post on this thread!

    I wasn't talking about cheques. Read the sentence in context.
    You'll never force your ideals down our necks cos some of us actually prefer cheques or at least like and have a use for them!

    Never did. I said the thread was "dead", Inactive got all upset, so I removed the comments after explaining myself.
    Anything I post is my opinion, so from time to time I may be wrong. I try to provide answers based in fact, however I don't know everything, so (like all posters on MSE), take what I say with a pinch of salt.
  • WestonDave
    WestonDave Posts: 5,154 Forumite
    Rampant Recycler
    I think cheques do have a finite remaining lifespan, but I also think that banks have some work to do in replacing their current function.

    It is true that their original function as a mainstream method of payment is dying in transactions with big organisations, but the reality is that for person to person transactions (including sole trader type businesses) there aren't really any adequate safeguarded alternatives to a guaranteed cheque, if on practical or financial grounds you cannot use a card terminal to take instant payment. Take the bloke that comes round to fix the washing machine - is he going to pitch up at your house with a card terminal and plug it into your phone line? No, so the alternatives to a cheque that are left to him are either taking cash or asking you to do an electronic transfer. The first is fine for the tradesmen but is a retrograde step - banks and government want to reduce cash transactions due to cost and tax evasion. It also means the paying party has to keep larger sums of cash on their person which is risky. The second alternative means that the tradesman ends up leaving the job not knowing whether he has been paid for it or not - inevitably some people won't pay and he will then end up chasing for payment ultimately having to add cost to everyone else's bills. Bank transfers are not the solution to this type of transaction and the banks have to produce that solution.

    If cheques are to go, we need an alternative person to person means of transferring funds which is secure (both in the sense of not requiring personal data to be handed out and in the sense of the recipient knowing he has definitely got the money), instant and low cost (or free). At the moment nothing is available to achieve that and before the banks start planning the wake for the demise of cheques they need to come up with this. Whether that is some kind of mobile phone based system I don't know (it wouldn't surprise me if that could be part of it) but simply rolling down the doors on the cheque can't happen until its remaining functions are replaced.
    Adventure before Dementia!
  • jambosans
    jambosans Posts: 1,493 Forumite
    WestonDave wrote: »
    I think cheques do have a finite remaining lifespan, but I also think that banks have some work to do in replacing their current function.

    I agree.
    WestonDave wrote: »
    Bank transfers are not the solution to this type of transaction and the banks have to produce that solution.

    I do think bank transfers could potentially fill the void. For example, Faster Payments would allow the payee to confirm the receipt of funds before any service is undertaken. FPS availability has got some way to go before it is on the same level as BACS. However there is plenty of time as the phasing out of cheques has not been announced.

    I would highlight that either going online or phoning your bank, setting up a Faster Payment, and then getting the payee to check their account either online or via the telephone is much more hassle than just writing out a cheque.

    This is one of the limitations of doing a bank transfer "on the spot", so I would definitely agree the banks have to come up with a solution or even make existing processes easier and more reliable.

    This quote from the BBC Website confirms the Payments Council's stand point on cheques:
    The Payments Council said it would not phase out cheques until it was confident that alternatives for the vast majority of current cheques uses had been identified and were accessible and acceptable to users.
    Anything I post is my opinion, so from time to time I may be wrong. I try to provide answers based in fact, however I don't know everything, so (like all posters on MSE), take what I say with a pinch of salt.
  • WestonDave
    WestonDave Posts: 5,154 Forumite
    Rampant Recycler
    Oh yes - Faster Payments - that'll be the scheme the banks only agreed to as a sop to the regulators and 12 months after it was supposed to be implemented is still limping through various phases - even now Nationwide still takes 3 days to process my payment to my credit card (I only use it now for the odd continuous authority item I've forgotten to move!).

    Still maybe if the Payments Council stick to its guns and don't let any bank phase out cheques until they all sort their lives and systems out for a workable alternative, it will force banks to do it properly unlike Farceter Payments!
    Adventure before Dementia!
  • jambosans
    jambosans Posts: 1,493 Forumite
    WestonDave wrote: »
    Oh yes - Faster Payments - that'll be the scheme the banks only agreed to as a sop to the regulators and 12 months after it was supposed to be implemented is still limping through various phases - even now Nationwide still takes 3 days to process my payment to my credit card (I only use it now for the odd continuous authority item I've forgotten to move!).

    Still maybe if the Payments Council stick to its guns and don't let any bank phase out cheques until they all sort their lives and systems out for a workable alternative, it will force banks to do it properly unlike Farceter Payments!

    Absolutely. The example I gave was completely generalised and was in a world where FPS was implemented correctly by all institutions.

    Like I said, cheques couldn't be removed now because the alternatives that exist are not quite up to scratch.
    Anything I post is my opinion, so from time to time I may be wrong. I try to provide answers based in fact, however I don't know everything, so (like all posters on MSE), take what I say with a pinch of salt.
  • Inactive
    Inactive Posts: 14,509 Forumite
    WestonDave wrote: »

    Still maybe if the Payments Council stick to its guns and don't let any bank phase out cheques until they all sort their lives and systems out for a workable alternative, it will force banks to do it properly unlike Farceter Payments!


    Somewhat optimistic, but I agree, I cannot think of any suitable alternative to the existing cheque system to be honest.

    The " Payments Council " looks very loaded in the banks/institutions favour in my opinion.
  • MarieAAP
    MarieAAP Posts: 278 Forumite
    I'm afraid I stilll like cheques. I know that they are not always ideal, but a) the company gets charges little or nothing, b) not carrying cash, c) not having to always remember another PIN number, and finally d) when the machines do fail, you can still pay without having to go find a cash machine.

    This happened once at a petrol station. I had to leave my driving license card behind the counter, so i could find an ATM to with draw the cash to pay for the petrol :)

    M
  • vet8
    vet8 Posts: 877 Forumite
    I have noticed that the kennels where I leave my dogs when I am away has stopped taking debit or credit cards (due to the charges I think) and you have to pay by cash or cheque. There is no other option.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.