We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has any one written a Complaint to Natwest (RBS) CEO Ross McEwan

Workingmum1990
Posts: 13 Forumite
Hello All,
I was recently a victim of fraud involving my debit card at NatWest Bank. In July 2015, the fraudster called up NatWest bank, with all my details at hand, and was able to cancel and order a new Debit Card and PIN. The fraudster then intercepted the post and was able to get their hands on the Debit Card and PIN. They took£12,000.
Has anyone had to take this process?
What was your experience with raising a complaint with the CEO of a bank?
Apologies, but I have been advised to keep the details of the case confidential until the outcome.
I was recently a victim of fraud involving my debit card at NatWest Bank. In July 2015, the fraudster called up NatWest bank, with all my details at hand, and was able to cancel and order a new Debit Card and PIN. The fraudster then intercepted the post and was able to get their hands on the Debit Card and PIN. They took£12,000.
Has anyone had to take this process?
What was your experience with raising a complaint with the CEO of a bank?
Apologies, but I have been advised to keep the details of the case confidential until the outcome.
0
Comments
-
I hate to ask this...... but who had access to your personal details - i.e. who is coming and going from your house to find this information, and be around to pick up post?
It's very sad, but the most likely person who perpetrated this fraud is someone close to you.
I'm surprised that they got so much money in two weeks? I thought cards had a limit to how much could be withdrawn. The largest amount that can be withdrawn on one of my cards is £500 a day, which would be a maximum of £7000 in the fortnight.
did you set up alerts for withdrawals?
Did you not check your bank accounts on a regular basis so you could pick up any unusual activity earlier?
Maybe the original claim was declined because the bank felt that you hadn't kept you details secure? e.g you had written down your PIN number
You said you raised a complaint and got a rationale for the decline - what was this rationale?Early retired - 18th December 2014
If your dreams don't scare you, they're not big enough0 -
Hey Goldiegirl,
No, no one has access to my personal information. I live in a council flat with my Husband and 7 month old daughter. When the postman leaves post on our door, he/she leaves the post half way in with half the post sticking out, ripe for any person walking next to it to steal the post. This has happened to my husband's account too, but the bank was able to sort it out. I live in a block of flats and our door faces a communal corridor. You would need to walk past my door to access 19 other flats.
Yes, they also withdrew money by going into the bank to do so, at this time the withdrew £4000 in 4 separate incidences at different branches. I didn't set up alerts unfortunately. I didn't know that I could. I didn't check my account at the time, I was dealing with severe postnatal depression at the time. It impacted on what I was doing during the day. No, I kept my PIN and Customer number in my head, I never wrote this down.
Without going to too much details, their rationale was:
They knew my Customer Number and PIN.
It is unlikely they intercepted the post.
They must have known how much money was in there before the fraud.
They summarised that I was involved in this
Any thoughts?0 -
leaves the post half way in with half the post sticking out, ripe for any person walking next to it to steal the post.
This happens every day? Have you made a formal, written complaint to the Post Office, explaining that their employee's negligence has led to fraudulent activity on your bank account?0 -
From your post I assume you are still waiting for a reply from the CEO?Workingmum1990 wrote: »Hey Goldiegirl,
They knew my Customer Number and PIN.
It is unlikely they intercepted the post.
They must have known how much money was in there before the fraud.
They summarised that I was involved in this
Any thoughts?
Don't the bank ask for ID for cash withdrawals over the counter so how did they justify allowing these cash withdrawals? Do they have CCTV in the branches to be able to identify who made the transactions?Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.0 -
Workingmum1990 wrote: »
Without going to too much details, their rationale was:
They knew my Customer Number and PIN.
It is unlikely they intercepted the post.
They must have known how much money was in there before the fraud.
They summarised that I was involved in this
Any thoughts?
From reading your initial post, they were the conclusions I came to, apart from you being involved in it - in these sort of cases it's often somebody who is close to the victim, close enough to know personal details and have access to the house/flat and who can look at mail that has been received.
You said that the fraudster had access to your customer number and online PIN. You initially said that have been keeping the details 'safe', then later said that you kept them 'in your head'.
This information would originally have been supplied by post, and would have been sent in separate letters. For the bank, and many people reading this, it would stretch credibility too far that the letters are sticking out of the postbox every day, that a fraudster would pull these two individual letters out of the postbox, steam them open to get the information and then stick the envelopes down again and put them back in your letter box.
The most likely explanation is, somebody you know has seen the letters, and statements so they know how much is in the account. Or you may even have told them yourself that you were expecting a large sum of money.
Have you been to the police yet? A crime has been committed here, so you should report it to them. But, I know this can be difficult, if you have any suspicion at all that someone close to you has done this.
There's nothing to stop you doing your own detective work as well. Were the branches used for the withdrawals close to where somebody you know works?
At least some of these withdrawals must have been done by ATM as you mentioned one was done just before midnight and one just afterwards. Was somebody close to you unaccounted for that evening? Or working a late shift?Early retired - 18th December 2014
If your dreams don't scare you, they're not big enough0 -
Workingmum1990 wrote: »We hired Richard Emery, 4Keys, who looked into the case we found that the fraudster made bank enquiries when they visited the cash machine to check the amount of money in there on a constant basis.Workingmum1990 wrote: »As Richard had to drop the case due to family mattersGoldiegirl wrote: »Have you been to the police yet?0
-
Thanks for your kind advice all.
I will try and summarise my response in one go. I have been in contact with the police and I have a crime reference number. They don’t give you much other than that and that I should contact FOS. I have been in contact and complained to the post office about the letters and they have apologise and have confirmed that the will be training their staff better. The letter was sent to the CEO too.
Richard Emery made some enquiries which showed how the fraudster used the account. They made balance enquiries all the time before they withdrew money. He was able to lead on the investigation because I gave him permission, in writing, to do so. No courts or anything. If he website is does not say something about personal matters, have you tried calling him and asking? I am not so sure why you mentioned that? The bank has CCTV and when we asked for footage the bank refused on the grounds that I it wouldn’t prove anything as I could have given the person permission access my account which is really frustrating.
I know you are trying to be helpful, but I kept my details safe in that it was in my head. I did get the letter confirming my details and I have since destroyed it. I couldn’t think of anyone who would do this. Can’t hackers access my computer to get all this information?
I am going to divert the responses and ask if anyone has dealt with any matter at CEO level with any bank and what their response were?0 -
Workingmum1990 wrote: ». Can’t hackers access my computer to get all this information?
However, logging into your account does not give the hacker your address or your PIN. It is a lot more likely that the thief is someone you know, or lives close to you.Workingmum1990 wrote: »
I am going to divert the responses and ask if anyone has dealt with any matter at CEO level with any bank and what their response were?0 -
Workingmum1990 wrote: »I did get the letter confirming my details and I have since destroyed it.
There is no way to know what a PIN is other than seeing it written or being entered or being spoken, or by a keylogger on a PIN entry device. What you do online is irrelevant as the PIN is never used there.Workingmum1990 wrote: »I am going to divert the responses and ask if anyone has dealt with any matter at CEO level with any bank and what their response were?
I very much doubt if the CEO has done any more than glance at your letter, if he's seen it at all. The CEO of a major bank has many things to keep them busy, all of them more important to the running of the bank than a single retail customer's complaint. In my 14 years working in banking I never even saw any of the CEOs during that time, let alone had any dealings with them (although I did miss a visit from Fred the Shred as I was out of the office that day).0 -
I very much doubt if the CEO has done any more than glance at your letter, if he's seen it at all. The CEO of a major bank has many things to keep them busy, all of them more important to the running of the bank than a single retail customer's complaint.
I would think it is very unlikely any CEO will see any consumer complaint addressed to them, and even more unlikely to do anything about such complaints themselves. Their mail box will be monitored by an assistant who will pass things to whoever is the right person in the Executive team. The assistant may or may not be sending an acknowledgement but the actual work will be done by someone who is appropriately qualified and authorised. They will be involving other people (lawyers, fraud specialists etc) as appropriate.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards