📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Green, ethical, energy issues in the news

1360361363365366837

Comments

  • Martyn1981
    Martyn1981 Posts: 15,335 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Countdown to a 'Biggie', but I wouldn't hold your breath, there's a lot of big and little 'P' politics going on here, and literally anything could happen.

    Divestment works – and one huge bank can lead the way
    On 15 October, the European Investment Bank meets to decide its policy on fossil fuels. The hand of history is on its shoulder
    And if the EIB does act, it will send a strong signal to markets and to other lenders. For almost a decade now, observers have understood that restricting the flow of money to the fossil fuel industry is a key part of the climate fight. That’s why endowments and portfolios worth more than $11tn have begun divesting their fossil fuel stocks; last month the University of California system became the latest big player to join in, scrubbing its $80bn endowment and pension fund of fossil fuel stocks. Heck, even a major American utility announced that it was divesting its pension fund because it could see where the future lay.
    The EIB would also be doing a service to everyone who will be hurt financially as the fossil fuel industry founders. As the governor of the Bank of England, Mark Carney, began warning some years ago, there are massive “stranded assets” represented by oil and gas reserves that can’t be burned if we are to meet our climate targets. This “carbon bubble” hangs over our markets like the housing bubble of a decade ago: if the EIB backs away from new fossil fuel lending, it will help with the slow deflation of that bubble, lessening pressure on the system.

    But the biggest reason for the EIB to take this step is simple: it responds to the cries of both young people and scientists.
    Anyone who believes in physics and chemistry knows that the time for change is here – indeed, it’s past due.

    The fifteenth of October is a crucial day in the most important fight the planet has ever faced, and a sign of whether Europe’s governments, particularly those of Germany and Italy, who insiders report have been strongly against a fossil-free EIB policy, will respond with open hearts to the outpouring of hope we have seen in the past weeks.
    Mart. Cardiff. 8.72 kWp PV systems (2.12 SSW 4.6 ESE & 2.0 WNW). 20kWh battery storage. Two A2A units for cleaner heating. Two BEV's for cleaner driving.

    For general PV advice please see the PV FAQ thread on the Green & Ethical Board.
  • Martyn1981
    Martyn1981 Posts: 15,335 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    If 'real' not gimmicks, then perhaps a compulsory offset for holidays could be required eventually?

    More travel companies offsetting carbon emissions
    A growing number of tour operators are offering to offset carbon emissions on behalf of holidaymakers. Trekking and adventure company World Expeditions says all of its trips will be carbon neutral as of 1 November – at no extra cost to its clients. The Australian company, which was established in 1975, sells 500 itineraries globally. For every holiday sold it will invest in forest protection projects in Zimbabwe and Tasmania, and renewable energy projects in China and Vietnam. Bamboo Travel has also announced plans to offset 1.5 tonnes of carbon for each client it sends on its holidays in Asia through a partnership with Gold Standard, a major player in the offsetting market.

    According to new research by adventure travel company Intrepid, younger travellers are keener to book through a company that offers offsetting than older ones. The study, based on its own figures and research by YouGov, found that 58% of travellers believe sustainability is an important factor when making travel choices, but when asked what steps they would like companies to take, only 20% of travellers aged 55+ said they would like the chance to offset, compared with 44% of those born in the late 1990s.
    Mart. Cardiff. 8.72 kWp PV systems (2.12 SSW 4.6 ESE & 2.0 WNW). 20kWh battery storage. Two A2A units for cleaner heating. Two BEV's for cleaner driving.

    For general PV advice please see the PV FAQ thread on the Green & Ethical Board.
  • Martyn1981
    Martyn1981 Posts: 15,335 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Depends on Q4 (how cold and the resulting leccy mix), but 2019 still looks likely to be the year when RE leccy exceeds FF.

    Renewable electricity overtakes fossil fuels in UK for first time
    Renewable energy sources provided more electricity to UK homes and businesses than fossil fuels for the first time over the last quarter, according to new research.

    The renewables record was set in the third quarter of this year after its share of the electricity mix rose to 40%.

    It is the first time that electricity from British windfarms, solar panels and renewable biomass plants has surpassed fossil fuels since the UK’s first power plant fired up in 1882.

    The new milestone confirms predictions made by National Grid that 2019 will be the first year since the Industrial Revolution that zero-carbon electricity – renewables and nuclear – overtakes gas and coal-fired power.
    Mart. Cardiff. 8.72 kWp PV systems (2.12 SSW 4.6 ESE & 2.0 WNW). 20kWh battery storage. Two A2A units for cleaner heating. Two BEV's for cleaner driving.

    For general PV advice please see the PV FAQ thread on the Green & Ethical Board.
  • JKenH
    JKenH Posts: 5,107 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 17 October 2019 at 8:13PM
    Northern Lincolnshire. 7.8 kWp system, (4.2 kw west facing panels , 3.6 kw east facing), Solis inverters, Solar IBoost water heater, Mitsubishi SRK35ZS-S and SRK20ZS-S Wall Mounted Inverter Heat Pumps, ex Nissan Leaf owner)
  • JKenH wrote: »
    It is a green and ethical money saving board, not a board for discussion of AGW, legal action against FF companies or propagation of your environmentalist views.

    Does your statement also cover your own posts arguing against the above?
    JKenH wrote: »
    Just for balance as some might say......
    5.18 kWp PV systems (3.68 E/W & 1.5 E).
    Solar iBoost+ to two immersion heaters on 300L thermal store.
    Vegan household with 100% composted food waste
    Mini orchard planted and vegetable allotment created.
  • JKenH
    JKenH Posts: 5,107 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Does your statement also cover your own posts arguing against the above?

    That was a little bit naughty don’t you think to alter my original post and include it as though it were a verbatim quote from me.

    What I actually posted was
    JKenH wrote: »
    It is a green and ethical money saving board, not a board for discussion of AGW, legal action against FF companies or propagation of your religious views.

    Leaving that aside, though, you are totally correct, it was an entirely inappropriate post on a money saving board. Thank you for pointing that out.
    Northern Lincolnshire. 7.8 kWp system, (4.2 kw west facing panels , 3.6 kw east facing), Solis inverters, Solar IBoost water heater, Mitsubishi SRK35ZS-S and SRK20ZS-S Wall Mounted Inverter Heat Pumps, ex Nissan Leaf owner)
  • 1961Nick
    1961Nick Posts: 2,107 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Martyn1981 wrote: »
    Two ways to look at this, not possible, or likely to happen anyway, but I suppose a government policy would make the second option more likely.

    Labour party pledges to ban sale of non-electric cars by 2030




    Quick logic test/question - is it possible for supply (I've no concerns about demand) to reach ~10% in 2021, 20% in 2022 ....... 100% in 2030? Seems tough to me, but perhaps possible?
    I think this drops into the 'would happen anyway' category. A ban of ICE vehicles should be unnecessary by then as EVs will be cheaper to buy, cheaper to run & the choice of ICE vehicles will be very limited. In fact, it's hard to think of any circumstances where someone would choose an ICE vehicle over an electric one.
    4kWp (black/black) - Sofar Inverter - SSE(141°) - 30° pitch - North Lincs
    Installed June 2013 - PVGIS = 3400
    Sofar ME3000SP Inverter & 5 x Pylontech US2000B Plus & 3 x US2000C Batteries - 19.2kWh
  • JKenH wrote: »
    You are totally correct, it was an entirely inappropriate post on a money saving board. Thank you for pointing that out.

    You're welcome.
    5.18 kWp PV systems (3.68 E/W & 1.5 E).
    Solar iBoost+ to two immersion heaters on 300L thermal store.
    Vegan household with 100% composted food waste
    Mini orchard planted and vegetable allotment created.
  • JKenH
    JKenH Posts: 5,107 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    1961Nick wrote: »
    I think this drops into the 'would happen anyway' category. A ban of ICE vehicles should be unnecessary by then as EVs will be cheaper to buy, cheaper to run & the choice of ICE vehicles will be very limited. In fact, it's hard to think of any circumstances where someone would choose an ICE vehicle over an electric one.

    I think the policy would be very damaging to JLR. While I am optimistic that the technology will move on rapidly, I don’t think JLR will have abandoned all ICE variants (mild hybrids) by then as they believe there will still be customers for heavy off roaders/towing vehicles.
    Northern Lincolnshire. 7.8 kWp system, (4.2 kw west facing panels , 3.6 kw east facing), Solis inverters, Solar IBoost water heater, Mitsubishi SRK35ZS-S and SRK20ZS-S Wall Mounted Inverter Heat Pumps, ex Nissan Leaf owner)
  • EricMears
    EricMears Posts: 3,304 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    1961Nick wrote: »
    . . . it's hard to think of any circumstances where someone would choose an ICE vehicle over an electric one.
    Anyone doing any towing - whether it's a caravan or just a small load to the local tip - would have their choice of BEV severely limited ! Not because they're incapable of towing but because the manufacturers haven't bothered to get type approval for fitting a tow bar. Off the top of my head, I think Tesla & Jaguar are the only ones that can be used for towing.

    There's also an argument in favour of anyone doing very long journeys where they're obliged to buy electricity at 40ppu or more using an ICE which then becomes cheaper to run. That of course only applies if it's a frequent need - occasional use of such chargers wouldn't take the average cost per mile up too much.
    NE Derbyshire.4kWp S Facing 17.5deg slope (dormer roof).24kWh of Pylontech batteries with Lux controller BEV : Hyundai Ioniq5
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.7K Life & Family
  • 256.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.