We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Quitting work to be a sahm?

124

Comments

  • Person_one
    Person_one Posts: 28,884 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Not quite. There's parental leave, which is unpaid and can only be taken in whole weeks (booked in advance). Emergency leave is only meant to be for emergencies, and to make arrangements for whatever the emergency is. So you couldn't be off for a week for a child with chicken pox, for example.

    I think you underestimate how many bugs kids get!!

    Some kids get a lot, some kids never miss a day of school.

    You can't seriously be suggesting that the possibility of needing to take time off or make arrangements for a kid with chicken pox is a reason for a mother who wants to work not to?
  • jackyann
    jackyann Posts: 3,433 Forumite
    Person_one wrote: »
    Some kids get a lot, some kids never miss a day of school.

    You can't seriously be suggesting that the possibility of needing to take time off or make arrangements for a kid with chicken pox is a reason for a mother who wants to work not to?

    I'm sure the poster wasn't, but it is an issue that needs some thought. A really sick child should not be at their parents' work: bad for everyone.
    I do think that parents who work need to plan their back up for when their kids are sick.

    Another problem is that children with special needs or medical conditions often have a lot of appointments which require a parent to be with them. The government offers extra childcare help for such parents, but time off for appointments often means that one parent has to take occasional / casual work.
  • Person_one
    Person_one Posts: 28,884 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    jackyann wrote: »
    I'm sure the poster wasn't, but it is an issue that needs some thought. A really sick child should not be at their parents' work: bad for everyone.
    I do think that parents who work need to plan their back up for when their kids are sick.


    I expect they do, for the most part!

    I'm all for people being stay at home parents or housewives/husbands if that's what they really want, but that doesn't mean those who don't want to are lesser parents. I know you aren't suggesting that but some posters are and I just wanted to offer another perspective so the OP wouldn't feel guilt tripped!
  • mildred1978
    mildred1978 Posts: 3,367 Forumite
    Person_one wrote: »
    Some kids get a lot, some kids never miss a day of school.

    You can't seriously be suggesting that the possibility of needing to take time off or make arrangements for a kid with chicken pox is a reason for a mother who wants to work not to?

    You'd be amazed at the restrictions schools and nurseries put on illness. A friends children 7 and 5 were both 'banned' from school because they suspected slapped cheek in the 5 year old. Her brother displayed no symptoms, its not a dangerous condition (and its pretty much gone by the time the red cheeks appear) but their mum had to go and pick them up and keep them both at home for 3 or 4 days.

    Another friend had to pick her son up from nursery urgently due to a suspect rash (which they thought might be measles). She took him straight to the GP, who confirmed it wasn't measles and rang the nursery for her. They refused to take the child for a week "just in case".

    And another currently has 2 kids off with chicken pox (7 year old caught it from toddler).
    Science adjusts its views based on what's observed.
    Faith is the denial of observation, so that belief can be preserved.
    :A Tim Minchin :A
  • Person_one
    Person_one Posts: 28,884 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I'm sorry Mildred I'm not really sure what point you're making in relation to the OP.
  • Bluemeanie_2
    Bluemeanie_2 Posts: 1,076 Forumite
    I've only read the first few posts, but I see you have qualifications in animal care etc. Can I assume from this you like pets? Have you thought of taking in dogs while the owners are on holiday? Or maybe small animals, like hamsters etc?

    The reason it sprang to mind is, my Mum normally has my dog while I go on hols, but next years we are all going. I won't leave her in kennels as it would be to distressing (or maybe I'm just a wet lettuce lol) so I have found a lady who minds them in her own home.
    Just thought, it gives you a bit of "pin" money, get's you out for a walk with the kids. Plus you get the benefit of having a pet without the commitment.

    I know it could be a long shot (lol) and you may not fancy it or have circumstances that allow you to do it etc but it just sprang to mind!
    I'm never offended by debate & opinions. As a wise man called Voltaire once said, "I disagree with what you say, but will defend until death your right to say it."
    Mortgage is my only debt - Original mortgage - January 2008 = £88,400, March 2014 = £47,000 Chipping away slowly! Now saving to move.
  • rosielx
    rosielx Posts: 306 Forumite
    Thank you for everyones responses. I have read through all of the posts and have decided to quit work early next year which gives me a little longer to increase my savings. I'm sure I'll change my mind a few million times more before then. Chicken number 4 is now reserved so I think we'll all be living on eggs :) and I have contacted an allotments waiting list. EEK.:j
    Trying to earn £2015 in 2015. Slightly early start ;). £175.88 today.
  • londoner1998
    londoner1998 Posts: 800 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    For what is worth, here is my contribution... I don't have children of my own (have a stepdaughter though), but I am now at home as I was made redundant in February. While is not the same, I find that after almost a decade working on whatever was there for me, going to University and the last five years working extremely hard to develop my skills and do well in my job, this break is being an extremely interesting time for me. For once, I have the chance to stop and think about what I really want to do next professionally (which involved a career change that wouldn't have been possible if I hadn't been made redundant) and how I want to live my life. The way I see it, if you can financially afford it and want to be more present for your children, go for it. I think women have to do what makes them happy and yes, we should support each other and respect our choices. All day at home with small children is not for every one and that doesn't make them bad mothers. Likewise, taking a break in your career to look after your children is very wise: I have a friend who is doing it now and loving it, again, after working extremely hard in a very unforgiving industry. Like others have said, children grow very fast and before you know it they will be semi-independent. I think you have a golden opportunity in front of you for a change- take it! I am sure you will find ways to get back in to your field once you have had the time to explore what's out there and your children are a bit older or you simply feel like going back to work. The choice is yours!!
  • mysk_girl
    mysk_girl Posts: 804 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    You'd be amazed at the restrictions schools and nurseries put on illness. A friends children 7 and 5 were both 'banned' from school because they suspected slapped cheek in the 5 year old. Her brother displayed no symptoms, its not a dangerous condition (and its pretty much gone by the time the red cheeks appear) but their mum had to go and pick them up and keep them both at home for 3 or 4 days.

    Another friend had to pick her son up from nursery urgently due to a suspect rash (which they thought might be measles). She took him straight to the GP, who confirmed it wasn't measles and rang the nursery for her. They refused to take the child for a week "just in case".

    And another currently has 2 kids off with chicken pox (7 year old caught it from toddler).

    Slapped cheek can cause miscarriage in pregnant women, so I can quite understand why a school wouldn't want children who may be infectious on the premises.
  • mildred1978
    mildred1978 Posts: 3,367 Forumite
    mysk_girl wrote: »
    Slapped cheek can cause miscarriage in pregnant women, so I can quite understand why a school wouldn't want children who may be infectious on the premises.
    I didn't know that. It makes sense then.
    Science adjusts its views based on what's observed.
    Faith is the denial of observation, so that belief can be preserved.
    :A Tim Minchin :A
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.