What ever happened to the ICE Fitter?

grayme-m

Sssssss wrote: »

what happened to the poll and did you get your money back?

Which poll?

mdbarber

grayme-m wrote: »

Which poll?

I posted a poll thread which was deleted, contacted abuse to ask why but got no reply,it received a fair bit of trolling and accused of it being biased but i didn't think it was at all

Sssssss

no trolls, just people sick and tired about reading your posts re incarexpress

for gods sake return their radio and you'l get your money back, or is that too easy for you!

mdbarber

Sssssss wrote: »

no trolls, just people sick and tired about reading your posts re incarexpress

for gods sake return their radio and you'l get your money back, or is that too easy for you!

Noone is forcing anyone to read any thing, its your choice, u don't wanna read it,, don't click the link!
And there is no way in hell i'm gonna send it back after all the crap they have thrown at me,, when the case is over they can come and collect it.
I'm in most tuesday and wednesday nites from 7.30 till 9.30.....

mdbarber

LMAO but talking to my friend and showing him the emails from incarexpress it now appears they are confirming trading standards were right all along!!
It's been a grand day!!

Bamber19

Tozer

Am I missing something? Is the issue simply to do with who pays for the return of the item which needed to be tested as well as the testing fee?

It doesn't seem unreasonable for the consumer to pay PROVIDED if it is faulty that the costs of return are reimbursed.

Is that the only issue here or have I missed something?

deanos

Tozer wrote: »

Am I missing something? Is the issue simply to do with who pays for the return of the item which needed to be tested as well as the testing fee?

It doesn't seem unreasonable for the consumer to pay PROVIDED if it is faulty that the costs of return are reimbursed.

Is that the only issue here or have I missed something?

Thats about it, a big fuss over £6 postage

dmg24

Tozer wrote: »

Am I missing something? Is the issue simply to do with who pays for the return of the item which needed to be tested as well as the testing fee?

It doesn't seem unreasonable for the consumer to pay PROVIDED if it is faulty that the costs of return are reimbursed.

Is that the only issue here or have I missed something?

Your understanding is the same as mine!

I can only assume that there are additional factors that mdbarber has mentioned as the thread(s) have developed. I can't find these factors, but did lose the will to live long before this page!

Freddie_Snowbits

Here is how to get a replacement item without the hassle of refusing to pay the postage, have a decent pint of beer and have some exercise at the same time
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?p=12336139&posted=1#post12336139

This thread is about how to lose your money for six months or more, find time to rant about and still sit there pontificating to otehrs they know a little about the law, excepting a little fact that comapny A has all this time had their money!