Prices will fall by 50% in four years

sabretoothtigger

Its income yield is about 2% higher then treasuries, a kings ransom

nollag2006

sabretoothtigger wrote: »

Its income yield is about 2% higher then treasuries, a kings ransom

Have you borrowed macaque's random word generator?

Please do try and post articulately. There's a good chap

RenovationMan

Thrugelmir wrote: »

Where you paybacks like the floatation of Facebook.

Oh dear, have you been at the Gin again, Thrug?

heathcote123

I'm amazed that this excellent thread dropped to the second page!

sabretoothtigger

nollag2006 wrote: »

Have you borrowed macaque's random word generator?

Please do try and post articulately. There's a good chap

Its a chrome addon, it helps me no end. The yield on treasuries is negative alledgely, some consider this impossible and others fact.

If it were negative it more then explains the increased use of gold instead, as obviously big money is very adverse to losing any part of itself.
This was the reaction to Lehmans when they caused money funds to go negative, funding withdrew completely from this market. I presume it could happen to government bonds or even plain cash could suffer the loss of the majority of its backers.

Most of us are net debtors not creditors so those big money wealth funds and people matter more then anything we can do or say on what objects are worth or what the rules are even

Even if we presume investors are idiots. Randomly one day they'll discover the truth of real returns

Thrugelmir

RenovationMan wrote: »

Oh dear, have you been at the Gin again, Thrug?

Even funds such as Foreign & Colonial Investment Trust (15% of the fund is invested in private equity) for one had a holding. :j

Seems as if they cashed in a slug of shares.

No doubt some of my other share holding did likewise.

moneyandtaxgeek

heathcote123 wrote: »

I'm amazed that this excellent thread dropped to the second page!

keep posting

nollag2006

heathcote123 wrote: »

I'm amazed that this excellent thread dropped to the second page!

Telling that the OP hasn't commented on it though.

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Graham_Devon

nollag2006 wrote: »

Telling that the OP hasn't commented on it though.

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Was the article he posted wrong, by any chance, Nollag?

RenovationMan

Thrugelmir wrote: »

Even funds such as Foreign & Colonial Investment Trust (15% of the fund is invested in private equity) for one had a holding. :j

Seems as if they cashed in a slug of shares.

No doubt some of my other share holding did likewise.

Aaahhhhh, I see, very good Thrug!

Not the Gin, but the random sentence generator mentioned earlier. Sorry, I'm a bit slow at the moment - lots of stuff happening at work.