We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Graph !!!!!! 2 - The next Generation
Options
Comments
-
Californication wrote: »
Source: House price crash dot co dot uk (I don't have anything to do with them, though)
Assuming the red trend line is the "average" house price, it would seem that the "correct" average house price should be around GBP150k. However, at present it is just below 175k. Thereofore, a further 15% fall would be required to get on-trend. However, markets tend to over correct, so it would not be unreasonable to expect around 20% further falls?In case you hadn't already worked it out - the entire global financial system is predicated on the assumption that you're an idiot:cool:0 -
Assuming the red trend line is the "average" house price, it would seem that the "correct" average house price should be around GBP150k. However, at present it is just below 175k. Thereofore, a further 15% fall would be required to get on-trend. However, markets tend to over correct, so it would not be unreasonable to expect around 20% further falls?
I dunno. The problem with all of this is of course, the answer too...the averages and the statistics. Its all very well to look at the average price, but then I suppose one needs to compare that with average affordability. No point the houses falling to the convenient place on the graph if people are still struggling to pay that.
Personally having thought about this I feel those waiting to buy are best served by a longer crash, regardless of the decline steepness, because people waiting to sell will struggle for a certain amount of time, and then start robbing Peter to pay Paul and will be abe to hold together for a while where as if this appears to have set in they may be better advised to cut their losses. I might have got this dramatially wrong though.0 -
BBC has a new graph for you all
Same data as:poppy100 -
Funny how graphs can be altered to make them seem better isn't it0
-
Nationwide September figures: -12.4% YoY, -1.7% MoM.0
-
Oh noes!
What will we do when the graph stops going down at about 14.5% in October0 -
obsessed_saver wrote: »Nationwide September figures: -12.4% YoY, -1.7% MoM.Illegitimi non carborundum.0
-
baby_boomer wrote: »Oh noes!
What will we do when the graph stops going down at about 14.5% in October0 -
-
As I have no mathematical or economic sense at all, but I do like looking at pretty pictures - I would like it if someone could run a line through the three low points on that graph. As a layman in these things would that give a visual indication of just how low the bottom could be on the dip?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards