We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Claim as single?
Comments
-
Not on subject, when the OH was in training and sunny climates, I rang Council Tax office to tell them I wanted to take him off as he is already paying tax at his base (which is included in rent etc) and he spent more time there than home.
Would they allow me to take him off as he was effectively paying twice, nope! PS this was before they changed that system by the way, as now he could claim it back.
All systems suck!99.9% of my posts include sarcasm!Touch my bum :money:Tesco - £1000 , Carpet - £20, Barclaycard - £50, HSBC - £50 + Car - £1700SAVED =£0Debts - £28500 -
Just wanted to say thanks for all the replies, it's amazing the amount of conflicting opinions.
God knows what I will do, probably absolutely nothing... I guess it's better to 'have someone' and be far poorer than be alone and well off..
Cheers again everyone for a great lively debate :beer:0 -
something_girl wrote: »
God knows what I will do, probably absolutely nothing... I guess it's better to 'have someone' and be far poorer than be alone and well off..
"Having someone" and being poorer is fine if you're mad about each other but "having someone" just for the sake of not being on your own is pretty pointless, regardless of any financial effects. Think of all the good things that you could do with more money, both on your own and for your child;is it worth giving up these for the sake of having some bloke around for a couple of nights a week? You're also wasting time that you could be using to achieve a worthwhile and lasting relationship; why settle for less?0 -
Oldernotwiser wrote: »"Having someone" and being poorer is fine if you're mad about each other but "having someone" just for the sake of not being on your own is pretty pointless, regardless of any financial effects. Think of all the good things that you could do with more money, both on your own and for your child;is it worth giving up these for the sake of having some bloke around for a couple of nights a week? You're also wasting time that you could be using to achieve a worthwhile and lasting relationship; why settle for less?
Settling for less, you always have to replace the batteries
99.9% of my posts include sarcasm!Touch my bum :money:Tesco - £1000 , Carpet - £20, Barclaycard - £50, HSBC - £50 + Car - £1700SAVED =£0Debts - £28500 -
just to update.
We have split, he moved out on Thursday, 100 miles away.
Guess it is now time to claim!0 -
something_girl wrote: »just to update.
We have split, he moved out on Thursday, 100 miles away.
Guess it is now time to claim!
Money aside, you OK with it?
:cool:0 -
well, it was awful coming back from work and seeing half the stuff gone, then the next day coming back and absolutely everything he owned gone (he must have come back with a van).. he sure is a quick worker.
I wasn't too great yesterday, but not so bad today. Luckily I have 2 lovely girls to keep me busy and back to work tomorrow, thank god!
Thanks for askin' xx0 -
something_girl wrote: »well, it was awful coming back from work and seeing half the stuff gone, then the next day coming back and absolutely everything he owned gone (he must have come back with a van).. he sure is a quick worker.
I wasn't too great yesterday, but not so bad today. Luckily I have 2 lovely girls to keep me busy and back to work tomorrow, thank god!
Thanks for askin' xx
Was it all just out of the Blue?!
The girls sure will keep you busy and in time you will be totally fine - probably only sorry he didn't leave sooner
:cool:0 -
Sounds as though you are better off without him! I have never been lonelier than when I was in a relationship that 'wasn't right'. You were unlikely to meet your Mr Right whilst still tied to this guy,now,who knows what's around the corner for you?Tomorrow is always fresh, with no mistakes in it!0
-
He wasn't ready for a committed relationship, even after 3 and a half years, so I should never have invited him to live with us, but with him living 100 miles away, there really wasn't much choice, perhaps it's a male, female thing, I had presumed that with living together it meant we were very serious and had a future, he just seemed to still be at the boyfriend/girlfriend stage, which is fine, but not living together... that just doesn't seem right to me!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards