We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Need a fixed IP address
Comments
-
weegie.geek wrote: »In what way is locking down security in this way not doing the job properly?
Because of the way it is being done. If it were being done properly, the connecting IP address would be irrelevent. By restricting it to a single IP address, you're excluding the majority of internet users in the UK from being able to access it as most are on dynamic IP addresses.
Using IP addresses as a method of security is completely pointless due to the ease in which IP addresses can be spoofed. All you're doing is creating a needless headache for your clients.0 -
I work for a very large, global (nameless, but well-known) company that provides authenticated access to web sites. I'm not saying that it's big or clever, but one of the several authentication methods available to our customers is via IP recognition. The services are only available to large businesses, so we can accept a written statement that they are using a fixed IP address that they control.
As for IP spoofing, is it really likely to be a threat? The spoofer would have to know which IP addresses would be accepted, wouldn't he?0 -
I work for a very large, global (nameless, but well-known) company that provides authenticated access to web sites. I'm not saying that it's big or clever, but one of the several authentication methods available to our customers is via IP recognition. The services are only available to large businesses, so we can accept a written statement that they are using a fixed IP address that they control.
As for IP spoofing, is it really likely to be a threat? The spoofer would have to know which IP addresses would be accepted, wouldn't he?
Without knowing the specifics of the project that is going on, I don't think a fixed IP for verification could ever be a 'silver bullet' solution to security. Not being an area of speciality of mine, but would it be used in combination with something else like a RSA SecurID style device to lock down access?0 -
I work for a very large, global (nameless, but well-known) company that provides authenticated access to web sites. I'm not saying that it's big or clever, but one of the several authentication methods available to our customers is via IP recognition. The services are only available to large businesses, so we can accept a written statement that they are using a fixed IP address that they control.
As for IP spoofing, is it really likely to be a threat? The spoofer would have to know which IP addresses would be accepted, wouldn't he?
It's as much a threat as the programmer perceives someone getting the log in details to be.0 -
Hello, sorry but I'm just not getting it lol. So would the companies suggested be of use?
http://www.no-ip.com/
http://www.technopagan.org/dynamic/#TheList
http://www.dynip.com/
I've taken abit longer getting back to him but could do with some more help! CheersHelp me to help you :santa2:0 -
easies approach m8 is too contact your isp see if they can offer you one, some smaller business orientated isp's used to do this as standard so may not be an issue at allclick here to achieve nothing!0
-
If the 2 pc's aren't connected to the same NAT router at work, the company should be using a vpn, problem solved.
If they are, they probably have an internal address, 192.168.x.x, or 10.x.x.x anyway. These can be made static by reserving the ip by allocating it to a mac address on the router.
More information on the nature of the connections is needed to help. Is the source an destination on an internal network, or between two different companies, or something else?
Having a static external address actually weakens security.Ever get the feeling you are wasting your time? :rolleyes:0 -
agreed! "a sitting duck" etc but that is their choicealbertross wrote: »The company should be using a vpn, problem solved.
Having a static address actually weakens security.click here to achieve nothing!0 -
Wish I could be more technical but basically I have a router which I've connected up one ethernet to the upstairs computer and a longer ethernet cable to the downstairs computer. Erm... what do I need to find out for you? well for me
Cheersalbertross wrote: »If the 2 pc's aren't connected to the same NAT router at work, the company should be using a vpn, problem solved.
If they are, they probably have an internal address, 192.168.x.x, or 10.x.x.x anyway. These can be made static by reserving the ip by allocating it to a mac address on the router.
More information on the nature of the connections is needed to help. Is the source an destination on an internal network, or between two different companies, or something else?
Having a static external address actually weakens security.Help me to help you :santa2:0 -
is this fixed IP just for 2 PCs networked together with wires? Nothing to do with remote access over the internet, or similar? Quite possibly we've all been barking up the wrong tree and overcomplicating things,,, if yes, operating system and router model requiredUtinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards