Housing gloom 'worst in 30 years'

Datasafe_2

adr0ck wrote: »

what has the population density of a country got to do with whether the population is growing or not?....please explain

It hasn't.

You were the one who jumped in on my overcrowded island comment, I just said that to futher explain Japans relevance as to the supply/demand arguement.

Try to keep up.

tee_pee_2

Just wanted to say thanks to Nelly for answering my query, think I leave this thread as I have just read it all and most of it is just an argument and sarcasm- not really a money saving or advice thread

Cheer Nelly
Tee

adr0ck

Datasafe wrote: »

Its easy enough to find

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/print/ja.html

So your arguement is based on projected future population? Sure thats predicted to down based on birthrates, but as everyone else has pointed out during their housing slump the population was still going up.

my argument wasn't based on population figures

you brought population into the argument

try to keep up datasafe

adr0ck

Datasafe wrote: »

It hasn't.

You were the one who jumped in on my overcrowded island comment, I just said that to futher explain Japans relevance as to the supply/demand arguement.

Try to keep up.

classic

datasafe

is it the time of the month or something

maybe dementia?

you brought population into the debate not me

do try and keep up

adr0ck

Datasafe wrote: »

Ahhhh so who it who is getting personal? not me.

you , nelly, amd !!!!!!? gates started the personal comments

if your personal to me......i will be personal back..................if you don't like it .......don;t start it

and do try to keep up

adr0ck

!!!!!!? wrote: »

I believe that Datasafe's figures claim that over the period of Japan's decade-long recession and house price crash, that the population was increasing until 2007, when it fell by 0.01%


Since you were arguing that Japan was different with regard to its crash because of a decreasing population it rather proves you wrong, I'd say.

Still, maybe his figures were wrong and the population was indeed decreasing in Japan over the period being discussed. You seem to be convinced the figures are on your side so did the population increase or decrease over Japan's decade of slump? Should be easy for you to back up, right?

my point was about how quickly Japan replaces its building stock

nothing more

do try to keep up Gates

adr0ck

Datasafe wrote: »

Its easy enough to find

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/print/ja.html

So your arguement is based on projected future population? Sure thats predicted to down based on birthrates, but as everyone else has pointed out during their housing slump the population was still going up.

datasafe theres nothing in that link stating that japans population has been growing year on year over the past 10 years...............it just states that japans population now is 127 million.......

Datasafe_2

adr0ck wrote: »

datasafe theres nothing in that link stating that japans population has been growing year on year over the past 10 years...............it just states that japans population now is 127 million.......

No I said this one......

http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/handbook/c02cont.htm#cha2_6

:rolleyes:

Or this nice chart displays it clearly

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/31/Japanese_Population_chart.png

Datasafe_2

adr0ck wrote: »

you , nelly, amd !!!!!!? gates started the personal comments

if your personal to me......i will be personal back..................if you don't like it .......don;t start it

and do try to keep up

I fail to see where in all my posts I got personal.

I see a discussion in which you have gone mardy because it hasn't gone your way. Get over it.

Datasafe_2

adr0ck wrote: »

classic

datasafe

is it the time of the month or something

maybe dementia?

you brought population into the debate not me

do try and keep up

Again it is you that is getting personal.You seem incapable of having an intellectual conversation without it decending into personal insults.