TV Licence article Discussion

[Deleted User]

Zapito wrote: »

It's still chicken-feed,

Not to someone on single person JSA it isn't.

Zapito

Bedsit_Bob wrote: »

Again, it's only your opinion


And again, your opinion.



Yet again, your opinion.

You seem concerned that I have opinions. Yes, I do have opinions. You have opinions. We all have opinions. That's what this is all about - expressing our opinions. Which I am entitled to do as much as anyone else.

[Deleted User]

Of course we all have opinions, but state them as though yours are facts.

Zapito

Bedsit_Bob wrote: »

Not to someone on single person JSA it isn't.

As I have said over and over, I agree with licence fee being included in benefit calculations. Do keep up.

Zapito

Bedsit_Bob wrote: »

Of course we all have opinions, but state them as though yours are facts.

Eh? What? You are not making yourself clear BB.

[Deleted User]

Zapito wrote: »

As I have said over and over, I agree with licence fee being included in benefit calculations.

But it currently isn't, making it regressive.

If a licence were only required for watching BBC channels, it wouldn't be a burden on the unemployed/low paid.

[Deleted User]

Zapito wrote: »

Eh? What? You are not making yourself clear BB.

Of course I'm making myself clear.

That the BBC is "a precious jewel not only in the eyes of the UK but all over the world" is an opinion, but you state it as though it were a fact.

Zapito

Bedsit_Bob wrote: »

Isn't World Service radio part of the BBC?

It is now, by govt action.

Indeed, the LF is approximately two whole weeks of JSA.

I agree it should be included in benefit calculations. :yawn:

Zapito

Bedsit_Bob wrote: »

That the BBC is "a precious jewel not only in the eyes of the UK but all over the world" is an opinion, but you state it as though it were a fact.

It is a fact.

Zapito

Bedsit_Bob wrote: »

But it currently isn't, making it regressive.

If a licence were only required for watching BBC channels, it wouldn't be a burden on the unemployed/low paid.

OK, that's a valid opinion (yes, one of those dreaded things). So propose it in the current charter review.

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/bbc-charter-review