We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
How can people be so greedy?
Comments
-
As far as I understand it, renting is also dead money if rents are higher than mortgage payments, which they are round here.
1) If your rent is less than an interest only mortgage, rent
2) If your rent is between the cost of an interest only mortgage and a repayment mortgage, consider buying, particularly if you're in the area for the long term.
3) If your rent is more than the cost of a repayment mortgage, buy if you're in the area for longer than about two years.
The cost of houses seems to be all about what people are able to pay. For the previous generation, it was a struggle to buy a house, not because of the huge prices, but because of interest rates and bank rules about who they would lend to and how much they would lend.
For our generation the banks are willing to lend large sums at low interest rates so house prices have risen to large sums. This magnifies the differences in income, where previously differences in job security and amount saved for a deposit would have been far more important.0 -
Still, if there is a crash, FTB's will be in a far, far better position to buy - deposit or not - than those who bought at the peak of the market and are now stuck in negative equity for years. At least FTB's only need to save a deposit, not dig themselves out of a financial black hole too....
And of course, if this scenario does come to pass, to save even 40% of a house that had crashed in price would be much easier to save than say 15% of a far more expensive house.
And it would be paid off farrrrrr more quickly.
(By the way, in previous crashes, eg early 90's, I don't recall 50% deposits being required, do you? Even banks have to make money somehow, and if they are only taking money in on deposit and not lending it out again and getting the interest, they're not going to do very well, are they? So I think 20% deposits are possible, but 50% unlikely.)
Don't forget carol it's different this time0 -
mr.broderick wrote: »Don't forget carol it's different this time
How will this crash be different? Accelerated?0 -
Interesting. On another thread on this board someone has dropped the price of the house 50k since July last year. The house we let is for sale has just been reduced by 20k......
While it is not a lot now, I think it does say a lot for he way things are going.
A guy my husband works with is paying £1200 a month on an interest only mortgage.... my husbands basic salary is £1250 a month..... this guys girlfriend has just had a baby...... I wonder where they are going to be in a years time???0 -
I think that things will change in that there will not be the offers of 6 times salary being offered for mortgages as there has been in the past, it will go to being 3x like it used to be.
I personally think that the whole senario is a circle of banks/EA and owners.
In this village we have 2 EA, one gives a higher sale price, the other a lower price (sometimes by 90k - my friend house was valued at 250k but expensive one marketed for 339k) - so everyone goes with getting the higher price of course. Or this used to be the case, now you see more boards from the lower rate one. You have to ask WHY people are wanting to sell. Have a read of the threads on this board, how many people are selling up to rent. They want to rent as they are in debt and selling will clear the debts, so they try and sell but they can't, so they knock 20k off, and then again and then end up selling for the minimum they need rather than what the house is 'worth'. And this is when prices will start coming down, people will not pay 200k for a house that sold next door for 150k. And prices will start to downturn. It won't happen overnight, but it will start. Reading the board on here and DFW gives a good indication of where things are going and I really do not think it is up - especially in the South of England and the Home Counties. I don't think we will ever see deposits of 50% being asked for though as the bank is a business the sameas any other, if they are losing money through decreasing prices they are not going to turn business away, are they??0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards