We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Pula to Bristol 14th July - Conpension claim rejected

Like most threads on here and to no one's shock, our compensation claim was rejected for a ~3:15 hr delay on a flight from Pula to Bristol from EasyJet.

While waiting in the airport we were getting notifications saying it was delayed leaving Bristol (the previous leg), something about ATC. However, on boarding the plane, the pilot suggested it was some technical fault with the aircraft, flying in a new crew and a nervous passenger. So nothing to do with ATC. We were also checking the Bristol airport site and other sites that had no ATC announcements. So EasyJet were lying?

We submitted the claim, which was rejected with a vague explanation:

"We always review claims fairly and in keeping with EU/UK regulation.  We know how frustrating delays can be. We always aim to provide the best possible experience when flying with us, however, from time-to-time situations arise which are outside of our control and unfortunately when this happens we are unable to offer compensation.

To further explain what happened on the day; on the previous sector there was a runway closure due to the equipment operating your flight was affected by an unforeseen issue , resulted in long delays to flights. Ultimately and in the case of this flight, the delay pushed our crew into their maximum legal operating hours. There are strict industry wide rules on the number of hours our crew are allowed to work. To protect the safety of our customers and crew, these hours cannot be exceeded. We do take reasonable measures to avoid cancellations and delays to our flights by having replacement crews and spare aircraft available in our network. In the circumstances, these options were not possible as the delay to your flight was as a direct result of the runway closure ."

What in the world does "on the previous sector there was a runway closure due to the equipment operating your flight was affected by an unforeseen issue"?

We were not aware of any other flights delayed this much from Bristol on the day and I'm unable to get data from 14th July.

There was no way to reply to this rejection so we submitted a formal complaint asking for more explaination.

Does anyone have any experience with this kind of wording?

«1

Comments

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 248K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.8K Life & Family
  • 262.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.