Travis Street Manchester

MothballsWallet

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/81983239#Comment_81983239

I'm confused, who are you referring to?

James_Poisson

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/81983730#Comment_81983730

You are shooting off at tangents now; what have LGV tarrifs to do with this, and what do you mean "missing terms so no contract"?

Hopefully you have submitted a good defence which is suggested by the fact they have made a last ditch offer but at the moment you are all over the place, coming up with additional thoughts, which are pointless. @Coupon-mad asked:

Interesting to see an in-house claim by CPS. Show us your defence, verbatim which you have ignored why don't you show us that here?

traceynob

My comments are to show how CPS are not exactly the sharpest tools in the toolkit! Missing terms is related to their sign that I posted earlier, which doesn't mention an additional £100 charge, so contractually they can't claim it. Definition of LGV's is relevant as the vehicle parked was a small van. But thanks for all the comments so far, I will update when I can, work permitting

traceynob

Update: CPS sent me a discontinuance form by email 4 weeks begore the hearing date the court dont contact you to tell you the claim has been discontinued so I called them to check and they confirmed it has been.

Gr1pr

Excellent

Another one bites the dust !

Coupon-mad

Haha, @ChirpyChicken was right about the woman behind this useless bunch of chancers!

Well done! At last. What a waste of your time. They couldn't win this one; this would never have got past the good judges at Manchester. Wrong defendant:

"I intervened for a friend who received an unfair ticket for staying at Travis Street car park where they spent 20 mins trying to pay using the app (the only way to pay) and then left after being unsuccessful. Somehow I am now being taken to court by Car Park Securities as keeper despite never being the owner or keeper of the vehicle."