We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Received letter from QDR solicitors

1356

Comments

  • Hi everyone, I received a court Claim Form today from Smart Parking via QDR Solicitors. What is my next step? 

    I have check on the Ringgo website and I can see I did pay for an hour's parking on the day in question, but the 'Particulars of Claim' details make no reference to how long I was meant to have overstayed, and what time I left. It just says insufficient paid time. It also says 'the Defendant is the driver of the vehicle', which they can't possibly know as I don't even know who was driving. Both my wife and me are insured for the car and it could have been either of us. 
  • Coupon-mad
    Coupon-mad Posts: 160,525 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 22 January at 3:00PM
    Hi, I have received a letter out of the blue from QDR solicitors on behalf of ZZPS claiming that I owe £170 (originally £100) for insufficient paid time in a car park nearly 2 years ago. I have not had any previous correspondence about this and I have no idea how long I paid for and how long I apparently overstayed. I'm not in the habit of overstaying in car parks, but it's not out the question that we were late back to the car by minutes rather than hours. When I google that car park it says that they use Ringgo, but I can only find my sessions going back about 6 months on the app. The letter looks very formal and is headed "formal letter of claim". I don't want to engage with them in case that just encourages them, but I don't want to ignore it in case they issue court proceedings. 

    On page two it states "if we do not hear within 30 days... we anticipate being instructed to issue court proceedings" Is this genuine? Would they not have to send a letter saying they definitely will be issuing proceedings? 

    Also, given that this is the first I have heard about this it all seems rather unreasonable! 

    Any advice would be gratefully received. I could pay the £170 to make it go away but I feel pretty angry at this dropping out of nowhere.

    Thanks 
    I would do nothing.  If you get a court claim via QDR then deal with it, using the help from here.  Engaging with them will neither discourage or encourage them
    Thanks for the quick reply.

    If I get a court claim won't that inevitably mean it will cost me more? 
    definitely not
    Your reply is assuming you would lose
    The aim is to win and pay Zero
    But why would I expect to win? Assuming I did overstay, which is presumably likely if they have gone to this much trouble - and I have no evidence to the contrary - then surely I may well lose? What's my defence other than 'this is the first I have heard of this'? 
    Why so negative, your defence would be no keeper liability (have a read up on that )
    You would most likely win because we do these all the time so can see who the claimant is and know the process
    If you get a court claim come back to use

    Your defence is available on all the other smart parking court claim threads, have a read , but no point spending time on this unless you get a claim


    Hi everyone, I received a court Claim Form today from Smart Parking via QDR Solicitors. What is my next step? 

    I have check on the Ringgo website and I can see I did pay for an hour's parking on the day in question, but the 'Particulars of Claim' details make no reference to how long I was meant to have overstayed, and what time I left. It just says insufficient paid time. It also says 'the Defendant is the driver of the vehicle', which they can't possibly know as I don't even know who was driving. Both my wife and me are insured for the car and it could have been either of us. 

    Oooh via QDR. That's unusual and is normally only issued by QDR in multiple PCN higher value cases. We did wonder when we saw the LBC. But the defence is pretty much going to be the same.

    Show us the POC and tell us the date of issue.


    PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
    CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
    Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD
  • ChrisBristol88
    ChrisBristol88 Posts: 25 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts
    edited 22 January at 3:00PM

    Date of issue is 19th January, arrived today
  • Here are the PoCs
  • Coupon-mad
    Coupon-mad Posts: 160,525 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 22 January at 3:10PM


    You've already been advised that your defence is shown on all Smart Parking court claim threads. In fact just read the Smart Parking Defence Group Thread. Use that one.
    PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
    CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
    Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD
  • I've reposted the PoC because it didn't show. Which Smart Parking Defence Group thread, there seem to be quite a number?

  • Gr1pr
    Gr1pr Posts: 12,817 Forumite
    10,000 Posts First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper

    Date of issue is 19th January, arrived today
    Do the AOS stage online on MCOL over the weekend or next week 

    The defence deadline is 33 days after that issue date,  ( which was the 19th. January. )

    Use the Smart Parking defence as mentioned earlier 
  • Coupon-mad
    Coupon-mad Posts: 160,525 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 22 January at 3:12PM
    I've reposted the PoC because it didn't show. Which Smart Parking Defence Group thread, there seem to be quite a number?

    I've bolded the important word you missed. There is only one! Search...
    PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
    CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
    Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD
  • Coupon-mad
    Coupon-mad Posts: 160,525 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 22 January at 3:14PM
    The POC says you were driving, as you noticed.

    That's odd. It reads as if your appeal admitted to driving or you ticked 'driver'. Did you?
    PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
    CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
    Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD
  • I haven't appealed or responded to or ticked anything!

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.