UKCPS - HM Courts & Tribunals Letter

Le_Kirk

andy26599 said:

Le_Kirk said:

Assuming that letter is a N1SDT claim form, what is the issue date and upon what date do you plan to submit the AoS?

Yes it's a N1SDT letter, dated 19th November and I plan to respond as soon as I can.

With an issue date of 19/11/25 and providing you complete(d) the AoS after 24/11/25 and before 08/12/25 your defence deadline date is 4.00 p.m. on 22/12/25

andy26599

Coupon-mad said:

Yes there is more than one box. The Defendant needs to put the details in for 'responding to a claim made against you'.

And it is likely that a lower case 'l' (ell) in the password is being read as a capital 'I' (eye) or vice versa. Or a zero as an O.

That's what I've done. we've signed it with Government Gateway, we've typed in the Claim No and the password given (there's no letters that could be read as a number and we've both tried it a number of times each, and still not letting us in because of incorrect claim number or password). 

Car1980

You'll have to ring the court on 0300 123 1057

ChirpyChicken

andy26599 said:

Coupon-mad said:

Yes there is more than one box. The Defendant needs to put the details in for 'responding to a claim made against you'.

And it is likely that a lower case 'l' (ell) in the password is being read as a capital 'I' (eye) or vice versa. Or a zero as an O.

That's what I've done. we've signed it with Government Gateway, we've typed in the Claim No and the password given (there's no letters that could be read as a number and we've both tried it a number of times each, and still not letting us in because of incorrect claim number or password). 

This is not uncommon,
Just do the AOS via Email
Https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-n9-response-pack 
then email to AOS.CNBC@justice.gov.uk
No need to ring anyone

andy26599

ChirpyChicken said:

andy26599 said:

Coupon-mad said:

Yes there is more than one box. The Defendant needs to put the details in for 'responding to a claim made against you'.

And it is likely that a lower case 'l' (ell) in the password is being read as a capital 'I' (eye) or vice versa. Or a zero as an O.

That's what I've done. we've signed it with Government Gateway, we've typed in the Claim No and the password given (there's no letters that could be read as a number and we've both tried it a number of times each, and still not letting us in because of incorrect claim number or password). 

This is not uncommon,
Just do the AOS via Email
Https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-n9-response-pack 
then email to AOS.CNBC@justice.gov.uk
No need to ring anyone

I've just rang them (before seeing this) and have done this. Can you still provide the defence online or so I have to write it all out?

Gr1pr

You copy and paste it into WORD,  ensure that it reflects your case,  add the header and footer details as seen in defences earlier this year, sign it, save as a pdf, and email it as an attachment to the claimresponses email address in the defence template thread in post 1.

Check your inbox and spam folders for the email auto response back from the CNBC in both cases

No writing,  no post, no MCOL,  just email 

ChirpyChicken

then email it to ClaimResponses.CNBC@justice.gov.uk

andy26599

Gr1pr said:

You copy and paste it into WORD,  ensure that it reflects your case,  add the header and footer details as seen in defences earlier this year, sign it, save as a pdf, and email it as an attachment to the claimresponses email address in the defence template thread in post 1.

Check your inbox and spam folders for the email auto response back from the CNBC in both cases

No writing,  no post, no MCOL,  just email 

Can I do that now? I don't need to wait for a response from the AoS?

Le_Kirk

There will be no response; submitting the AoS just extends your deadline by 14 days

andy26599

Thanks all, just copied it into word and updating now. with para 3, I've copied this from the thread listed, and as it's a Moorside claim, I don't need to add anything further, is that correct?

3. With regards to the POC in question, two recent persuasive appeal judgments in Civil Enforcement Limited v Chan (Ref. E7GM9W44) and Car Park Management Service Ltd v Akande (Ref. K0DP5J30) would indicate the POC fails to comply with Civil Procedure Rule 16.4(1)(e) and Practice Direction Part 16.7.5. On the 15th August 2023, in the Chan case, HHJ Murch held: 'the particulars of the claim as filed and served did not set out the conduct which amounted to the breach in reliance upon which the claimant would be able to bring a claim for breach of contract'. The same is true in this case and the Defendant trusts that the Court should strike out the extant claim, using its powers pursuant to CPR 3.4. The second recent persuasive appeal judgment also held that typical private parking case POC (like this) fail to comply with Part 16. On the 10 May 2024, in CPMS v Akande, HHJ Evans held: 'Particulars of Claim have to set out the basic facts upon which a party relies in order to prove his or her claim'."