We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Don't cut Cash ISA limit, MPs urge Government

Reducing the cash ISA allowance won't motivate people to invest in stocks and shares, a cross-party group of MPs has warned. In a new report published on Saturday 25 October, the Treasury Committee has urged the Government to leave the £20,000 limit in place – echoing previous calls from MoneySavingExpert.com founder Martin Lewis...

Read the full story:
'Don't cut Cash ISA limit, MPs urge Government – as Martin Lewis says 'carrot will work better than a stick' to encourage investing'

If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply.

Comments

  • Kim_13
    Kim_13 Posts: 3,736 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 27 October at 11:55AM
    I’d like to know why anyone would think the government should start reform by looking at the Personal Savings Allowance rather than Cash ISAs - use of the former is more likely to result in savers achieving above inflation returns on an emergency fund that should be held in cash.
  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 18,911 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Kim_13 said:
    I’d like to know why anyone would think the government should start reform by looking at the Personal Savings Allowance rather than Cash ISAs - use of the former is more likely to result in savers achieving above inflation returns on an emergency fund that should be held in cash.
    It does seem somewhat odd that you essentially get 2 bites of the cherry with tax free ISAs and then a tax free allowance too. I could see the logic in removing it so that interest is taxable as it used to be and ISAs are the vehicle for getting interest without tax paid as they were originally.
    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
  • wmb194
    wmb194 Posts: 5,339 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    jimjames said:
    Kim_13 said:
    I’d like to know why anyone would think the government should start reform by looking at the Personal Savings Allowance rather than Cash ISAs - use of the former is more likely to result in savers achieving above inflation returns on an emergency fund that should be held in cash.
    It does seem somewhat odd that you essentially get 2 bites of the cherry with tax free ISAs and then a tax free allowance too. I could see the logic in removing it so that interest is taxable as it used to be and ISAs are the vehicle for getting interest without tax paid as they were originally.
    IIRC the idea behind the PSA was to minimise the number of people needing to complete self assessment or otherwise need HMRC to adjust tax codes etc.
  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 27,971 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    A return to the deduction at source regime would be helpful if going down that road.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.