We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Winter Fuel Payment if one member opts out.

1246

Comments

  • Dazed_and_C0nfused
    Dazed_and_C0nfused Posts: 18,193 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    pinnks said:
    Thanks.  I know what she should get but the award letter is crystal clear, which raises all sorts of wider questions about the implementation of the policy.  Is this a one-off error or something else?

    It does sound like an error on DWP's part.

    Even Google Gemini thinks she should be getting just £100!
  • Dazed_and_C0nfused
    Dazed_and_C0nfused Posts: 18,193 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    Is this what you were interest in?

    https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/969/made
  • sheramber
    sheramber Posts: 23,261 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts I've been Money Tipped! Name Dropper
    pinnks said:
    My wife received her WFP award letter today informing her that she'll get £200 (under 80, no other additions etc) as she was born before the cut-off date and "no other person in the household is eligible".

    That would be fine, except I am eligible, being a pre-September 1959er, but have opted out. 

    I would therefore expect her to receive only £100 as I remain eligible but have opted out of receiving payment (otherwise the policy of means-testing WFP is a farce) and wonder whether this is a one-off, or systemic, error in DWPs procedures... 

    If anyone knows the legal basis on which opting out is based, can they point me at it please as she (and I) would receive WFP without a claim under Reg 5 of the relevant regs, so cannot "withdraw a claim" that was neither made, nor necessary...
    Would this apply?


    • £200 if you were born before 22 September 1945 but the person you live with was born between 22 September 1945 and 21 September 1959
  • pinnks
    pinnks Posts: 1,583 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Is this what you were interest in?

    https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/969/made
    Thanks but no - they are just the regulations providing for the WFP.  Reg 5 deals with "Making a Winter Fuel Payment without a claim", which is what happens for most of us but the regulations do not deal (as far as I can see) with the apparently long-standing ability to opt out. 

    There must be legislation that permits oping out, otherwise DWP would be operating by concession by accepting opt outs and that is not allowed as a general rule.  I would like to read the relevant legislation to see what opting out actually means, especially when there is no claim. (I already know you can cancel or withdraw a claim to benefits before the claim has been actioned/completed but that is not, I think, where we are in the context of WFP without a claim) 
  • pinnks
    pinnks Posts: 1,583 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    sheramber said:
    pinnks said:
    My wife received her WFP award letter today informing her that she'll get £200 (under 80, no other additions etc) as she was born before the cut-off date and "no other person in the household is eligible".

    That would be fine, except I am eligible, being a pre-September 1959er, but have opted out. 

    I would therefore expect her to receive only £100 as I remain eligible but have opted out of receiving payment (otherwise the policy of means-testing WFP is a farce) and wonder whether this is a one-off, or systemic, error in DWPs procedures... 

    If anyone knows the legal basis on which opting out is based, can they point me at it please as she (and I) would receive WFP without a claim under Reg 5 of the relevant regs, so cannot "withdraw a claim" that was neither made, nor necessary...
    Would this apply?


    • £200 if you were born before 22 September 1945 but the person you live with was born between 22 September 1945 and 21 September 1959
    No because we are both under 80.
  • Dazed_and_C0nfused
    Dazed_and_C0nfused Posts: 18,193 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Fifth Anniversary Name Dropper
    pinnks said:
    Is this what you were interest in?

    https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/969/made
    Thanks but no - they are just the regulations providing for the WFP.  Reg 5 deals with "Making a Winter Fuel Payment without a claim", which is what happens for most of us but the regulations do not deal (as far as I can see) with the apparently long-standing ability to opt out. 

    There must be legislation that permits oping out, otherwise DWP would be operating by concession by accepting opt outs and that is not allowed as a general rule.  I would like to read the relevant legislation to see what opting out actually means, especially when there is no claim. (I already know you can cancel or withdraw a claim to benefits before the claim has been actioned/completed but that is not, I think, where we are in the context of WFP without a claim) 
    Have also found this.  But suspect it doesn't help much really.

    https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/969/pdfs/uksiem_20250969_en_001.pdf
  • pinnks
    pinnks Posts: 1,583 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Yeah, I read that too, and this one (which makes an interesting read) is where I picked up on the "While this opt-out option has existed for years" point.

    The Social Fund Winter Fuel Payments Regulations 2025: letter to the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions - GOV.UK

  • Yamor
    Yamor Posts: 673 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The opt-out works because the power to pay a WFP without a claim is not mandatory. See the use of the word "may" in Reg. 5(1). There is plenty of case law backing this.
  • pinnks
    pinnks Posts: 1,583 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Thanks.  That is the closest I had subsequently come to rationalising the position, so basically, although the "may" would essentially be a "shall" based on the information they hold, i.e. you would just get it automatically, if you call them and say, "please don't do this", they put a flag on your record to stop the auto payment.  This would leave you the option of making a claim before 31 March etc...
  • Yamor
    Yamor Posts: 673 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    That's right, and as you've discovered, it leaves a very useful method to enable a couple where one earns over £35k, and the other doesn't, to still receive the full WFP of £200/£300.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.