We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PCP Claims via My Claim Group


When initiating the claim, your "no win no fee" your solicitor may need to secure a specialized legal protection insurance policy for you. This policy covers costs in the event of an unsuccessful claim and ensures that the process remains risk-free. This insurance is always in place as a precaution.
This will be done if you lack an existing legal protection policy that offers adequate coverage. Such coverage is sometimes included in home or motor insurance or as a benefit of certain credit cards. It's a simple matter to verify, and your "no win no fee" solicitor will confirm this when commencing work on your claim.
As you don't need to make any payments in the event of a loss, "no win no fee" arrangements eliminate the financial risk associated with pursuing a financial claim. Notably, this approach guarantees equitable access to justice for cases involving financial disputes resulting from undisclosed commissions.
However, pursuing a compensation claim on "no win no fee" terms is contingent on your solicitor:
Agreeing to handle your claim under these terms initially.
Ensuring that suitable legal protection insurance is in place, which means you won't be required to pay if the claim is unsuccessful.
Determining that your claim has a consistently good probability of success, usually 50% or higher.
Adhering to the terms of the insurance policy at all times.
Comments
-
PNY405 said:Has anyone got any information about the Insurance Policy required by the engaged solicitor. For instance MY Claim Group has the following clause. This sounds a bit risky to me that No Win No Fee is totally correct? can anyone help? many thanks
When initiating the claim, your "no win no fee" your solicitor may need to secure a specialized legal protection insurance policy for you. This policy covers costs in the event of an unsuccessful claim and ensures that the process remains risk-free. This insurance is always in place as a precaution.
This will be done if you lack an existing legal protection policy that offers adequate coverage. Such coverage is sometimes included in home or motor insurance or as a benefit of certain credit cards. It's a simple matter to verify, and your "no win no fee" solicitor will confirm this when commencing work on your claim.
As you don't need to make any payments in the event of a loss, "no win no fee" arrangements eliminate the financial risk associated with pursuing a financial claim. Notably, this approach guarantees equitable access to justice for cases involving financial disputes resulting from undisclosed commissions.
However, pursuing a compensation claim on "no win no fee" terms is contingent on your solicitor:
Agreeing to handle your claim under these terms initially.
Ensuring that suitable legal protection insurance is in place, which means you won't be required to pay if the claim is unsuccessful.
Determining that your claim has a consistently good probability of success, usually 50% or higher.
Adhering to the terms of the insurance policy at all times.
The problem with "no win, no fee" is they can only talk about their own fees, they can't make a promise that if it goes to court and you lose that the judge wouldnt award costs against you which is why they recommend the insurance if you dont have LE cover elsewhere that applies.
The other problem with conditional funding, beyond how much of your award they take, is that you become locked in. If you want to discontinue the case you have to pay the lawyers for their time and disbursements inc the insurance.
Typically solicitors buy their ATE from the same place, or a small number of places. The insurers then can price in how good the solicitors are at winning their cases.0 -
Is this about DCA/commission or just in general?
If the former, don't use a claims companySam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
PCP Claims via My Claim GroupAny reason you are signing up to an ambulance chaser for something as simple as this?
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
I dont have the information going back to 2007 to start with. It would still be good to know what theis insurance policy is even if I dont use them and how much the rip off is despite them saying no win no fee
0 -
PNY405 said:I dont have the information going back to 2007 to start with. It would still be good to know what theis insurance policy is even if I dont use them and how much the rip off is despite them saying no win no fee
The FCA is consulting on a free to use redress scheme. All claims will be put through that. And you would will just end up paying a fee for someone inputting your name and address into that.
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
PNY405 said:I dont have the information going back to 2007 to start with. It would still be good to know what theis insurance policy is even if I dont use them and how much the rip off is despite them saying no win no fee
Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0 -
PNY405 said:I dont have the information going back to 2007 to start with. It would still be good to know what theis insurance policy is even if I dont use them and how much the rip off is despite them saying no win no fee0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards