We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Moneda Capital Warning

1246

Comments

  • Has anybody else received an email from Moneda, purporting that they are under investigation by the FCA, and that anybody seeking further information should contact the FCA directly - they even provided the phone number and case reference number? 
  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 27,615 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Has anybody else received an email from Moneda, purporting that they are under investigation by the FCA, and that anybody seeking further information should contact the FCA directly - they even provided the phone number and case reference number? 
    The FCA does instruct firms to release approved communications to all known investors in such circumstances, so it is probably genuine and not the sort of thing they'd do without it being true. However, I'd be hesitant to use any contact details in the email just in case.
    There is little point contacting the FCA. If they need anything from you then they are capable of getting your details and contacting you directly, as they did me during their investigation into a fraudulent P2P platform I'd invested in some years ago. At some point they may gather evidence about what investors were told about what they were supposed to be investing in.
  • I guess in a position where I don’t know what’s real or not anymore, my mindset is desperately trying to gain a glimmer of hope from any direction - despite what might be forlornly obvious staring me in the face… 
  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 27,615 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    A glimmer of hope is that they at least seem to be appearing to cooperate with the FCA, first changing their website, now warning investors.
    It's far too early to make any predictions about how it will play out though.
  • clairec666
    clairec666 Posts: 557 Forumite
    500 Posts Name Dropper
    masonic said:
    A glimmer of hope is that they at least seem to be appearing to cooperate with the FCA, first changing their website, now warning investors.
    It's far too early to make any predictions about how it will play out though.
    Suggests perhaps that they weren't out there to scam people and run off with their money (in which case they would have just shut down the website and vanished by now). Probably ineptness / bad business decisions rather than criminality, and they're ignoring phone calls from irate investors while they sort the whole mess out.
  • The FCA details don't look promising, as the FCA website doesn't list them as a company that they regulate. 
    I called the number (which is the actual FCA number) but can't get through. Still trying.

    Any other avenues to pursue other than Action Fraud?
  • poseidon1
    poseidon1 Posts: 1,629 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    masonic said:
    A glimmer of hope is that they at least seem to be appearing to cooperate with the FCA, first changing their website, now warning investors.
    It's far too early to make any predictions about how it will play out though.


    As I pointed out back in May, their last rather dismal published  accounts at Companies House told me everything I needed to know about this company - see below

    https://share.google/MToe5xqwqMkWNh76R

    Surely a tiny  negative balance sheet, vanishingly short trading history culminating in a trading loss should have tipped off prospective clients?

      If that wasn't a  sufficient clue then the preamble to the accounts that describes their primary activity as developing and managing properties via SPVs should have rang very loud alarm bells with unpleasant echos of LCF.
  • masonic
    masonic Posts: 27,615 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    The FCA details don't look promising, as the FCA website doesn't list them as a company that they regulate. 
    I called the number (which is the actual FCA number) but can't get through. Still trying.

    Any other avenues to pursue other than Action Fraud?
    Moneda isn't regulated by the FCA, but has been drawn into their jurisdiction by (potentially) engaging in regulated activities without authorisation.
    There is nothing currently for victims to do. There will no doubt be further news as the FCA investigation progresses.
  • I too received the email.  This is also linked to Strowz Ltd and if you look them up online the FCA show a warning report issued to them, also under FCA investigation. It's rather damning.  I consulted a solicitor who suggested a possible Ponzi Scheme whereby investor's money is never actually invested in the banks they say
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.