We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Parking Code of Practice Consultation 2025 - now let's see what happens

1…464748495052»

Comments

  • yarpsnehpets
    yarpsnehpets Posts: 276
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    edited Today at 7:25AM

    That's all good information - thank you.

    So the next obvious question in my mind relates to the accessing of DVLA Keeper data under KODOE agreement.

    The agreement requires operators to be members of a recognised ATA and, more critically, to agree to follow the Code of Practice.

    So the question is; would an operator still be allowed to agree to follow the Code (and obtain RK details) in a circumstance where the operator knew full well that a parking contravention fell outside of that Code?

    Wouldn't that be quite deceptive? This needs covering off.

    If they were allowed to access RK data in that circumstance then it would surely be totally unregulated?

  • Papermate2
    Papermate2 Posts: 26
    10 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite

    The DVLA - Operator KODOE contract might look robust on paper, but the terrifying reality is that the DVLA point-blank refuses to investigate or sanction operator breaches.

    I can say this with absolute certainty because I have spent well over 100 hours exhaustively documenting this exact failure. I raised a significant, formal complaint with the DVLA, pushing through Step 1 and Step 2. This was followed by an investigation by the Independent Complaints Assessor (ICA)—which was partly upheld—and the case is now subject to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO).

    Through this process and my targeted Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, I have confirmed that the DVLA is 100% hands-off. They appoint the ATAs (the industry trade bodies) and then immediately cut the umbilical cord. If a breach is flagged, the DVLA simply phones the IPC—with no FOI paper trail—for a quiet, one-off fix with the operator. They expect the industry to police itself.

    So, if an operator grabs Registered Keeper data for a ticket issued on "non-relevant land" that falls outside the statutory Code, the DVLA will do absolutely nothing about it.

    Without effective, independent government oversight—which this new regulatory-captured Code deliberately avoids—nothing will change, and the industry cheating will continue unabated. This is exactly why we need to force Parliament to halt this Statutory Instrument now.

★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 606K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.