We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Martin Lewis: Cash ISA limit could be cut – this is 'p*ss people off economics'
Comments
-
And the total ISA limit was £7k. The current limit does seem very high when the average person has a fraction of that annual amount in savings so allowing £20k year on year is benefitting those who can afford it and reducing revenues.Sg28 said:In 1999 the cash isa limit was £3000. Adjusted for (the boe's) inflation this gives around £5,750.Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.2 -
I am talking £250k of cash ISA holdings limit Anyone with that in ISAs should have plenty of other retirement income from personal and state pension.friolento said:daveyjp said:Just set a maximum limit for cash which can be held in ISAs. Make it high enough to accommodate anyone who wants lower risk - £250k will fund a decent retirement income. There's a limit for Premium Bonds and no one is moaning it should be higher.Your understanding of "decent" does not tally with mine. Particularly not in a falling interest rate and high cost of living environment, few NHS dentists, and terrible GP/NHS service which drives people towards private services.
0 -
That's fine for cash ISAs but the benefits of S&S ISAs go way beyond a £1k interest allowance (£500 or less for higher rate)Stubod said:..they should just stop all ISA's and raise the basic tax threshold, and increase the current £1k savings allowance before tax to (say), £2k..??Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.0 -
Another great argument for moving my tax residency away in the next couple of months and invest where I get something in return, working services and where creating wealth and working hard for it making sacrifies to build something is appreciated and not patronised and penalised.5
-
Perhaps so when you have a decent income and potentially a lot of life in front of you but when your pot no longer gets replenished after large capital expenditure and the final curtain draws ever nearer your risk profile changes. I still have a tidy sum in S&S ISAs but have maxed out in Cash ISAs in recent years, particularly the latter ones when interest rates had a little peak.For the vast majority of people who can afford to save more than a few £k, then once they have more than £20k (basic rate taxpayer so no ISA needed) or £50k (higher rate so use PBs) then it would make much more sense to invest in equities.3 -
I’d agree with that, however leaving the £20K unchanged on the proviso that most of it is S&S does the same. Those in the middle are forced to pay more tax or take a risk that would be better suited to those that would actually be affected if the £20K figure was lowered.jimjames said:
And the total ISA limit was £7k. The current limit does seem very high when the average person has a fraction of that annual amount in savings so allowing £20k year on year is benefitting those who can afford it and reducing revenues.Sg28 said:In 1999 the cash isa limit was £3000. Adjusted for (the boe's) inflation this gives around £5,750.1 -
All well and good until they put a stop to that. I certainly wouldn't put it past them. If that happens, I wonder what would happen to the MMF I currently have in my S&S ISA.IvanOpinion said:I know it's not the same and there is increased risk, but people could invest in a money market fund in a S&S ISA.3 -
I feel quite fortunate that we have been saving money in isas for years and built up around £0.5 million free of tax. As a result I'm really not to bothered what gets announced on July 15th. We'll just accept the outcome, roll with the punches and do what suits us best.......which won't paying into S&S isas.
2 -
There is no FCFS protection and therefore people could lose all their money. Gold is safer.IvanOpinion said:I know it's not the same and there is increased risk, but people could invest in a money market fund in a S&S ISA.0 -
What about transferring cash holdings in previous tax year(s) cash ISA's into a new cash ISA? Will there be limits to the amount you can transfer? What about selling funds held in S&S ISA(s) from previous tax years in to cash and moving it into an old, or new Cash ISA(s)? Will there be a limit how much you can transfer?
These are just some of many questions. As people have already stated, it'll just make the whole system even more complicated.There is a pleasure in the pathless woods, There is a rapture on the lonely shore, There is society, where none intrudes, By the deep sea, and music in its roar: I love not man the less, but Nature more...1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards




