We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Martin Lewis: Cash ISA limit could be cut – this is 'p*ss people off economics'
Comments
-
Whatever decision Rachel Reeves makes on 15th of July I think it very unlikely that she'll change her mind and reverse the decision. There's only so many U-Turns a government can do and I don't think this would be one of them.Butt Spelle Chequers Two Khan Make Awe Full Miss Steaks0
-
You're obviously not a betting individual 😄Shylock_249 said:Whatever decision Rachel Reeves makes on 15th of July I think it very unlikely that she'll change her mind and reverse the decision. There's only so many U-Turns a government can do and I don't think this would be one of them.1 -
So, I do a little bit of investing in stocks and shares with cash i can afford to lose. I put my savings in to a cash ISA. If i put my savings in to a S&S ISA, will my savings value go down? Or is just the rate of return/interest that fluctuates?0
-
Unless they are made ineligible to be held in an ISA. Which then raises the question of whether that is applied retrospectively to previous years' holdings.GazzaBloom said:If the cash ISA limits are reduced it's easy enough to use a stocks and shares ISA and buy a short term money market fund, which is typically viewed as “cash like” and elevate the 2 finger royal salute to Rachel from accounts. STMMFs are typically going to pay interest closer to BOE base rate than high street bank cash ISAs anyway.1 -
Agreed, but I bet there won't be a lot of investors voting Labour at the next election who have put the remainder of their ISA allowance (expecting it to be 16k) into S&S for the next 4 years when their individual valuation is much less than the 64k they invested. Yes, I do realise the value could go up BUT 4 years isn't a long time in investment terms.Middle_of_the_Road said:
You're obviously not a betting individual 😄Shylock_249 said:Whatever decision Rachel Reeves makes on 15th of July I think it very unlikely that she'll change her mind and reverse the decision. There's only so many U-Turns a government can do and I don't think this would be one of them.Butt Spelle Chequers Two Khan Make Awe Full Miss Steaks0 -
You could lose your entire savings.Jonesy214eva said:So, I do a little bit of investing in stocks and shares with cash i can afford to lose. I put my savings in to a cash ISA. If i put my savings in to a S&S ISA, will my savings value go down? Or is just the rate of return/interest that fluctuates?Statement of Affairs (SOA) link: https://www.lemonfool.co.uk/financecalculators/soa.phpFor free, non-judgemental debt advice, try: Stepchange or National Debtline. Beware fee charging companies with similar names.0 -
I was just thinking the same thing, if folk are 'nudged' into investing what they would have placed into a Cash ISA and there's a stock market crash just prior to the next election . . . . . . . .Shylock_249 said:
Agreed, but I bet there won't be a lot of investors voting Labour at the next election who have put the remainder of their ISA allowance (expecting it to be 16k) into S&S for the next 4 years when their individual valuation is much less than the 64k they invested. Yes, I do realise the value could go up BUT 4 years isn't a long time in investment terms.Middle_of_the_Road said:
You're obviously not a betting individual 😄Shylock_249 said:Whatever decision Rachel Reeves makes on 15th of July I think it very unlikely that she'll change her mind and reverse the decision. There's only so many U-Turns a government can do and I don't think this would be one of them.
Except I don't think many folk will be nudged, especially if STMMFs are made ineligible, and the funds will be just be placed in taxable savings accounts - maybe that's the cunning plan behind all this!!1 -
Is that not even more reason to reverse the reduction, if they want to retain votes?Shylock_249 said:
Agreed, but I bet there won't be a lot of investors voting Labour at the next election who have put the remainder of their ISA allowance (expecting it to be 16k) into S&S for the next 4 years when their individual valuation is much less than the 64k they invested. Yes, I do realise the value could go up BUT 4 years isn't a long time in investment terms.Middle_of_the_Road said:
You're obviously not a betting individual 😄Shylock_249 said:Whatever decision Rachel Reeves makes on 15th of July I think it very unlikely that she'll change her mind and reverse the decision. There's only so many U-Turns a government can do and I don't think this would be one of them.0 -
kimwp said:
You could lose your entire savings.Jonesy214eva said:So, I do a little bit of investing in stocks and shares with cash i can afford to lose. I put my savings in to a cash ISA. If i put my savings in to a S&S ISA, will my savings value go down? Or is just the rate of return/interest that fluctuates?You are correct, and the unfortunate thing is many who may be tempted with S & S ISA will be blissfully unaware of this & just see the glossy returnsA disaster in the making as newbies loose it all to those who will certainly be after cash ISA moneyNumerus non sum2 -
Exactly, take for example one could have saved the 16k at 4.5% = £720 interest free. That £720 would be notified to HMRC and liable to tax at 20%, ie £144.oo.mebu60 said:Shylock_249 said:
Agreed, but I bet there won't be a lot of investors voting Labour at the next election who have put the remainder of their ISA allowance (expecting it to be 16k) into S&S for the next 4 years when their individual valuation is much less than the 64k they invested. Yes, I do realise the value could go up BUT 4 years isn't a long time in investment terms.Middle_of_the_Road said:
You're obviously not a betting individual 😄Shylock_249 said:Whatever decision Rachel Reeves makes on 15th of July I think it very unlikely that she'll change her mind and reverse the decision. There's only so many U-Turns a government can do and I don't think this would be one of them.
Except I don't think many folk will be nudged, especially if STMMFs are made ineligible, and the funds will be just be placed in taxable savings accounts - maybe that's the cunning plan behind all this!!
Me and my wife have always put the maximum amount (20k) into fixed rate ISAs within the first few days of the new FY so we will be £288.oo worse off because at the age of 77 & 75 we are certainly NOT going to invest in S&S ISA. And we won't get the Winter Fuel Allowance either because that will be clawed back by Rachel too.....
My Suggestions (Minister of Good Ideas!):
Allow pensioners to retain the current 20k rate.
Allow pensioners like myself and wife who don't have any children to merge ISAs into a Joint Pensioners' ISA, thereby avoiding probate on the death of one of us.Butt Spelle Chequers Two Khan Make Awe Full Miss Steaks1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards




