We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Making a large gift and IHT implications?
Options
Comments
-
We only have niblings to leave our estate to too.
If they (our estate) have to pay IHT then so be it, they will still get to share a substantial sum.
I personally wouldn't bother paying insurance premiums (which may be high due to age/health) just so they can inherit even more, especially when the estate can cover it.How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 2.60% of current retirement "pot" (as at end May 2025)1 -
Sea_Shell said:We only have niblings to leave our estate to too.
If they (our estate) have to pay IHT then so be it, they will still get to share a substantial sum.
I personally wouldn't bother paying insurance premiums (which may be high due to age/health) just so they can inherit even more, especially when the estate can cover it.You make a good/valid point.I think the cost of the insurance premiums will be the deciding factor.0 -
macadam said:Sea_Shell said:We only have niblings to leave our estate to too.
If they (our estate) have to pay IHT then so be it, they will still get to share a substantial sum.
I personally wouldn't bother paying insurance premiums (which may be high due to age/health) just so they can inherit even more, especially when the estate can cover it.You make a good/valid point.I think the insurance premiums are going to be the deciding factor.1 -
macadam said:Sea_Shell said:We only have niblings to leave our estate to too.
If they (our estate) have to pay IHT then so be it, they will still get to share a substantial sum.
I personally wouldn't bother paying insurance premiums (which may be high due to age/health) just so they can inherit even more, especially when the estate can cover it.You make a good/valid point.I think the insurance premiums are going to be the deciding factor.Our estate is still in IHT territory but we are OK with that, a chunk of that money might be needed for care costs, and we want the ability to have total control over that we zero LA input. Live in carers are not cheap and neither are the best local residential care homes.1 -
Have you looked at making gifts out of income? Loads of info available - eg https://www.mandg.com/wealth/adviser-services/tech-matters/iht-and-estate-planning/exemptions-and-relief/normal-expenditure-out-of-income
and
https://hwfisher.co.uk/gifts-out-of-surplus-income-three-rules-to-remember/
or maybe taking some proper professional advice...?Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!1 -
Keep_pedalling said:macadam said:Sea_Shell said:We only have niblings to leave our estate to too.
If they (our estate) have to pay IHT then so be it, they will still get to share a substantial sum.
I personally wouldn't bother paying insurance premiums (which may be high due to age/health) just so they can inherit even more, especially when the estate can cover it.You make a good/valid point.I think the insurance premiums are going to be the deciding factor.Our estate is still in IHT territory but we are OK with that, a chunk of that money might be needed for care costs, and we want the ability to have total control over that we zero LA input. Live in carers are not cheap and neither are the best local residential care homes.
Hopefully your experience will prompt others to look at this option seriously in conjunction with substantial lifetime gifts.1 -
poseidon1 said:Keep_pedalling said:macadam said:Sea_Shell said:We only have niblings to leave our estate to too.
If they (our estate) have to pay IHT then so be it, they will still get to share a substantial sum.
I personally wouldn't bother paying insurance premiums (which may be high due to age/health) just so they can inherit even more, especially when the estate can cover it.You make a good/valid point.I think the insurance premiums are going to be the deciding factor.Our estate is still in IHT territory but we are OK with that, a chunk of that money might be needed for care costs, and we want the ability to have total control over that we zero LA input. Live in carers are not cheap and neither are the best local residential care homes.
Hopefully your experience will prompt others to look at this option seriously in conjunction with substantial lifetime gifts.2 -
Marcon said:Have you looked at making gifts out of income? Loads of info available - eg https://www.mandg.com/wealth/adviser-services/tech-matters/iht-and-estate-planning/exemptions-and-relief/normal-expenditure-out-of-income
and
https://hwfisher.co.uk/gifts-out-of-surplus-income-three-rules-to-remember/
or maybe taking some proper professional advice...?Thanks for the Links, but I'm currently suffering from Information Overload just now from watching too many YouTube videos on gifting & IHT.Booked a half hour free consultation with a legal firm to discuss options.0 -
I would have thought an IFA would be a better option than a solicitor.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards