We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Making a large gift and IHT implications?

Options
13»

Comments

  • Sea_Shell
    Sea_Shell Posts: 10,025 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    We only have niblings to leave our estate to too.

    If they (our estate) have to pay IHT then so be it, they will still get to share a substantial sum.   

    I personally wouldn't bother paying insurance premiums (which may be high due to age/health) just so they can inherit even more, especially when the estate can cover it.
    How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 2.60% of current retirement "pot" (as at end May 2025)
  • macadam
    macadam Posts: 15 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Photogenic
    edited 16 June at 5:51PM
    Sea_Shell said:
    We only have niblings to leave our estate to too.

    If they (our estate) have to pay IHT then so be it, they will still get to share a substantial sum.   

    I personally wouldn't bother paying insurance premiums (which may be high due to age/health) just so they can inherit even more, especially when the estate can cover it.

    You make a good/valid point.
    I think the cost of the insurance premiums will be the deciding factor.
  • bobster2
    bobster2 Posts: 954 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 500 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    macadam said:
    Sea_Shell said:
    We only have niblings to leave our estate to too.

    If they (our estate) have to pay IHT then so be it, they will still get to share a substantial sum.   

    I personally wouldn't bother paying insurance premiums (which may be high due to age/health) just so they can inherit even more, especially when the estate can cover it.

    You make a good/valid point.
    I think the insurance premiums are going to be the deciding factor.
    In my previous post I had your estate at £1million. If it's £900,000 then with a £200,000 gift you would be buying insurance (to cover the IHT for the gift amount) to ensure that your niece ended up inheriting £750,000 vs £670,000 in total (if you died within 7 years of the gift). So about 10% more.
  • Keep_pedalling
    Keep_pedalling Posts: 20,807 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    macadam said:
    Sea_Shell said:
    We only have niblings to leave our estate to too.

    If they (our estate) have to pay IHT then so be it, they will still get to share a substantial sum.   

    I personally wouldn't bother paying insurance premiums (which may be high due to age/health) just so they can inherit even more, especially when the estate can cover it.

    You make a good/valid point.
    I think the insurance premiums are going to be the deciding factor.
    We did this after gifting a 6 figure sum to our children when we were in our mid 60s, the premiums were around £20 per month but that would be to cover both of us dying  within 7 years, and the policy was set up through our financial advisor. 

    Our estate is still in IHT territory but we are OK with that, a chunk of that money might be needed for care costs, and we want the ability to have total control over that we zero LA input. Live in carers are not cheap and neither are the best local residential care homes.
  • Marcon
    Marcon Posts: 14,413 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!  
  • poseidon1
    poseidon1 Posts: 1,363 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    macadam said:
    Sea_Shell said:
    We only have niblings to leave our estate to too.

    If they (our estate) have to pay IHT then so be it, they will still get to share a substantial sum.   

    I personally wouldn't bother paying insurance premiums (which may be high due to age/health) just so they can inherit even more, especially when the estate can cover it.

    You make a good/valid point.
    I think the insurance premiums are going to be the deciding factor.
    We did this after gifting a 6 figure sum to our children when we were in our mid 60s, the premiums were around £20 per month but that would be to cover both of us dying  within 7 years, and the policy was set up through our financial advisor. 

    Our estate is still in IHT territory but we are OK with that, a chunk of that money might be needed for care costs, and we want the ability to have total control over that we zero LA input. Live in carers are not cheap and neither are the best local residential care homes.
    That is very helpful insight into the  potential actual cost of insurance for these 7 year IHT protection situations. My sense is some people are under the impression /assumption ( without having made specific enquiries themselves) that the cost can be a lot higher for those age 60 plus.

    Hopefully your experience will prompt others to look at this option seriously in conjunction with substantial lifetime gifts.
  • Keep_pedalling
    Keep_pedalling Posts: 20,807 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    poseidon1 said:
    macadam said:
    Sea_Shell said:
    We only have niblings to leave our estate to too.

    If they (our estate) have to pay IHT then so be it, they will still get to share a substantial sum.   

    I personally wouldn't bother paying insurance premiums (which may be high due to age/health) just so they can inherit even more, especially when the estate can cover it.

    You make a good/valid point.
    I think the insurance premiums are going to be the deciding factor.
    We did this after gifting a 6 figure sum to our children when we were in our mid 60s, the premiums were around £20 per month but that would be to cover both of us dying  within 7 years, and the policy was set up through our financial advisor. 

    Our estate is still in IHT territory but we are OK with that, a chunk of that money might be needed for care costs, and we want the ability to have total control over that we zero LA input. Live in carers are not cheap and neither are the best local residential care homes.
    That is very helpful insight into the  potential actual cost of insurance for these 7 year IHT protection situations. My sense is some people are under the impression /assumption ( without having made specific enquiries themselves) that the cost can be a lot higher for those age 60 plus.

    Hopefully your experience will prompt others to look at this option seriously in conjunction with substantial lifetime gifts.
    We have let the policy continue to run after the initial term and it now costs us £49 per month into our early 70s, 
  • macadam
    macadam Posts: 15 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Photogenic
    Marcon said:

    Thanks for the Links, but I'm currently suffering from Information Overload just now from watching too many YouTube videos on gifting & IHT.

    Booked a half hour free consultation with a legal firm to discuss options.

  • Keep_pedalling
    Keep_pedalling Posts: 20,807 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I would have thought an IFA would be a better option than a solicitor. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.