We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Gas flue in catio
Options
Comments
-
WIAWSNB said: Your cheeky catio installer - if your GS had slapped a 'Danger - do not use' warning on your boiler due to that joist, you'd have been able to force them to reposition it, or your money back. Hey-ho :-)
Her courage will change the world.
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.0 -
cathymaker said:.It's a BAXI 800. I shall keep you posted as I've got a gas engineer coming out tomorrow for a second opinion and will discuss ideas. Yours mainly - you've been brilliant!I hope your existing flue pipe nozzle can be adapted to the addition of a plume kit, as there's a chance it cannot be - if it's an older boiler. In which case, a whole new flue plus plume may be required which will cost £100's. In that case, going 'mesh', at least on that section of roof, may be your best bet.Just got it! 'cat' + 'patio'!!!!1
-
WIAWSNB said: I hope your existing flue pipe nozzle can be adapted to the addition of a plume kit, as there's a chance it cannot be - if it's an older boiler. In which case, a whole new flue plus plume may be required which will cost £100's. In that case, going 'mesh', at least on that section of roof, may be your best bet.The nuclear option would be to fit a completely new flue going straight up through the pitched roof.Her courage will change the world.
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.0 -
FreeBear said:WIAWSNB said: Your cheeky catio installer - if your GS had slapped a 'Danger - do not use' warning on your boiler due to that joist, you'd have been able to force them to reposition it, or your money back. Hey-ho :-)0
-
WIAWSNB said:cathymaker said:.It's a BAXI 800. I shall keep you posted as I've got a gas engineer coming out tomorrow for a second opinion and will discuss ideas. Yours mainly - you've been brilliant!I hope your existing flue pipe nozzle can be adapted to the addition of a plume kit, as there's a chance it cannot be - if it's an older boiler. In which case, a whole new flue plus plume may be required which will cost £100's. In that case, going 'mesh', at least on that section of roof, may be your best bet.Just got it! 'cat' + 'patio'!!!!1
-
Plume kits are designed as an easy and unobtrusive way to take the flue exhaust - which can appear steamy - away from where it can cause a visual nuisance. It's a much smaller pipe, and only extends the central - exhaust - part of the flue, the sticky-out nozzle.They are designed to replace the existing nozzle, and simply clip in. The problem can be that the existing flue doesn't have the type of terminal that'll accept it - some do, some don't. So, if it doesn't, then the whole flue section may need changing first - an expensive pain.In which case, I don't know if it's an option to continue with the 'full' flue, removing that end terminal, adding an elbow, a short upright, and a terminal - the existing flue will likely have this suitability, as these flues sections are designed to slot together, and then the flue terminal fitted on the end.
Yes, it's more unsightly to have a whole white flue instead of the smaller plume pipe, but clearly the aesthetics of that side of your property has already been compromised. Kidding!
If you don't need to replace the whole existing flue, that should be a lot cheaper.
Possibly it'll require a couple of 45o elbows to dogleg past the gutter, but no big deal.Later, when you instead get a dawg, you can have the ugly flue extension removed...0 -
WIAWSNB said:Plume kits are designed as an easy and unobtrusive way to take the flue exhaust - which can appear steamy - away from where it can cause a visual nuisance. It's a much smaller pipe, and only extends the central - exhaust - part of the flue, the sticky-out nozzle.They are designed to replace the existing nozzle, and simply clip in. The problem can be that the existing flue doesn't have the type of terminal that'll accept it - some do, some don't. So, if it doesn't, then the whole flue section may need changing first - an expensive pain.In which case, I don't know if it's an option to continue with the 'full' flue, removing that end terminal, adding an elbow, a short upright, and a terminal - the existing flue will likely have this suitability, as these flues sections are designed to slot together, and then the flue terminal fitted on the end.
Yes, it's more unsightly to have a whole white flue instead of the smaller plume pipe, but clearly the aesthetics of that side of your property has already been compromised. Kidding!
If you don't need to replace the whole existing flue, that should be a lot cheaper.
Possibly it'll require a couple of 45o elbows to dogleg past the gutter, but no big deal.Later, when you instead get a dawg, you can have the ugly flue extension removed...
1 -
cathymaker said:WIAWSNB said:Plume kits are designed as an easy and unobtrusive way to take the flue exhaust - which can appear steamy - away from where it can cause a visual nuisance. It's a much smaller pipe, and only extends the central - exhaust - part of the flue, the sticky-out nozzle.They are designed to replace the existing nozzle, and simply clip in. The problem can be that the existing flue doesn't have the type of terminal that'll accept it - some do, some don't. So, if it doesn't, then the whole flue section may need changing first - an expensive pain.In which case, I don't know if it's an option to continue with the 'full' flue, removing that end terminal, adding an elbow, a short upright, and a terminal - the existing flue will likely have this suitability, as these flues sections are designed to slot together, and then the flue terminal fitted on the end.
Yes, it's more unsightly to have a whole white flue instead of the smaller plume pipe, but clearly the aesthetics of that side of your property has already been compromised. Kidding!
If you don't need to replace the whole existing flue, that should be a lot cheaper.
Possibly it'll require a couple of 45o elbows to dogleg past the gutter, but no big deal.Later, when you instead get a dawg, you can have the ugly flue extension removed...
2 -
Section62 said:cathymaker said:WIAWSNB said:Plume kits are designed as an easy and unobtrusive way to take the flue exhaust - which can appear steamy - away from where it can cause a visual nuisance. It's a much smaller pipe, and only extends the central - exhaust - part of the flue, the sticky-out nozzle.They are designed to replace the existing nozzle, and simply clip in. The problem can be that the existing flue doesn't have the type of terminal that'll accept it - some do, some don't. So, if it doesn't, then the whole flue section may need changing first - an expensive pain.In which case, I don't know if it's an option to continue with the 'full' flue, removing that end terminal, adding an elbow, a short upright, and a terminal - the existing flue will likely have this suitability, as these flues sections are designed to slot together, and then the flue terminal fitted on the end.
Yes, it's more unsightly to have a whole white flue instead of the smaller plume pipe, but clearly the aesthetics of that side of your property has already been compromised. Kidding!
If you don't need to replace the whole existing flue, that should be a lot cheaper.
Possibly it'll require a couple of 45o elbows to dogleg past the gutter, but no big deal.Later, when you instead get a dawg, you can have the ugly flue extension removed...1 -
cathymaker said:Section62 said:cathymaker said:WIAWSNB said:Plume kits are designed as an easy and unobtrusive way to take the flue exhaust - which can appear steamy - away from where it can cause a visual nuisance. It's a much smaller pipe, and only extends the central - exhaust - part of the flue, the sticky-out nozzle.They are designed to replace the existing nozzle, and simply clip in. The problem can be that the existing flue doesn't have the type of terminal that'll accept it - some do, some don't. So, if it doesn't, then the whole flue section may need changing first - an expensive pain.In which case, I don't know if it's an option to continue with the 'full' flue, removing that end terminal, adding an elbow, a short upright, and a terminal - the existing flue will likely have this suitability, as these flues sections are designed to slot together, and then the flue terminal fitted on the end.
Yes, it's more unsightly to have a whole white flue instead of the smaller plume pipe, but clearly the aesthetics of that side of your property has already been compromised. Kidding!
If you don't need to replace the whole existing flue, that should be a lot cheaper.
Possibly it'll require a couple of 45o elbows to dogleg past the gutter, but no big deal.Later, when you instead get a dawg, you can have the ugly flue extension removed...
Her courage will change the world.
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards