Moorside Legal - Another case

wp408

Defence submitted last week. Forgot to update the thread. 

Interestingly, NCP have giving back control of the car park in question to Portsmouth Council from the 16th of May. Will this affect there claim against me as they no longer have an interest in the property? 

Gr1pr

wp408 said:

Defence submitted last week. Forgot to update the thread. 

Interestingly, NCP have giving back control of the car park in question to Portsmouth Council from the 16th of May. Will this affect there claim against me as they no longer have an interest in the property? 

None whatsoever,  they were enforcing on the date of the incident 

wp408

Received a letter from the court with the following, I'm sure templated response to the defence submission. Dated the 16th of May.

"I acknowledge receipt of your defence. A copy is being served on the claimant (or the claimant's solicitor).

The claimant may contact you direct to attempt to resolve any dispute. If the dispute cannot be resolved informally, the claimant will inform the court that he wishes to proceed. The court will then inform you of what will happen.

Where he wishes to proceed, the claimant must contact the court within 28 days after receiving a copy of your defence. After that period has elapsed, the claim will be stayed. The only action the claimant can then take will be to apply to a judge for an order lifting the stay"

Coupon-mad

Yep - but that's normal and you know about that from the first 12 steps in the Template Defence thread.

  

patient_dream

Yes ... sounds good

Moorside are still virgins in the parking scam and they still think that BPA/IPC is some sort of law
BOTH ARE UBREGULATED and the fake add-on is called the OSNER scam which was approved by the BPA.

The promlem Moorside has with their comments is there is a much higher authority than Moorside.
It's called the Supreme Court and in the case of Parking Eye and Barry Beavis, the court ruled that the charge set covered the operation of the scheme
That was an £85 charge not £100 ?

Moorside seem to be copying DCBL and their rubbish and the DCBL failures

Moorside should read and understand what the Supreme Court ruled
"that the charge set covered the operation of the scheme"

To rely on an unregaulated ATA  which is not a law is living in fools paradise

County Court judges can only rely on the Supreme Court and not a members club like the BPA/IPC who approve scamming the public
Moorside are misleading the court and you

wp408

N180 submitted. No further updates right now, but will post again if I need to check anything that comes up outside the guidance posted on the forum.

wp408

An annoying update to this thread. 

Firstly, as I posted above, I sent in the n180 to the DQ.CNBC@justive.gov.uk on the 23rd of June. I also received an acknowledgment that they had received my email. 

Today I received this letter in today's (22nd) post, dated the 13th, ordering I send them the N180 by the 20th. I've missed this window, not by my own fault but because Royal Mail had not delivered the letter in the time frame of this letter. 

This is very odd as I sent the N180 in June and received receipt of my email to them and was awaiting next steps. I've once again re-sent the N180 and showed the date and time in my reply of the first email to them. 

The n180 is under the 10mb limit at as a 9mb pdf, so there shouldn't be an issue on file format or size.

Any advice or have I had my defence struck out automatically as the letter suggests? 

Castle

It's 7 days from the date of service, which is 5 days after the date of the court order; therefore, your deadline is 25th August, (but, because of the bank holiday it's Tuesday 26th).

ChirpyChicken

just send another now immediately
why on earth are peoples PDF files do big its madness
they should be around 231 KB maximum!!!!!

wp408

Castle said:

It's 7 days from the date of service, which is 5 days after the date of the court order; therefore, your deadline is 25th August, (but, because of the bank holiday it's Tuesday 26th).

Great, so I'm within the time limit for the second upload. 

However, How can I make sure they actually have the document? I've sent the same file twice now, and received the same email back that they have received it. But this letter makes me doubt this process.

Send it as a letter as well?