We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
I was refused entry in a local B&M store today
Comments
-
Scary stuff really, I was stopped at Coop, after loading the shopping in the car, went back to return the basket and a guy said "you didn't pay for the box of chocolates".
I whipped out the receipt, he went off inside briefly and returned to say "oh yes you did".
Now, aside from the false accusation which could have been phrased as a question and lack of an apology for his mistake, had I not returned the basket would you get banned for something like this?
I know any shop can refuse service but why would they really want to lose a loyal customer who has shopped in their store for over 10 years because a member of staff made a mistake.
Rights and wrongs of facial recognition aside, this idea of being falsely labelled as guilty without it being proven through a verified system undermines the basic principles of our freedoms in a (so-called) democracy.In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces2 -
But they would not know it was a mistake if you didn’t return with proof.0
-
It's not that a mistake was made, it's that a mistake may be made and without any due process your information can be uploaded to database labelling you as a shoplifter, the lack of accountability is the issue.sheramber said:But they would not know it was a mistake if you didn’t return with proof.In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces4 -
It's a mistake made by a human, not the technology and what data is uploaded? it's going to be a a 3d map of your face, so not quite your bank account details.
It's not that a mistake was made, it's that a mistake may be made and without any due process your information can be uploaded to database labelling you as a shoplifter, the lack of accountability is the issue.sheramber said:But they would not know it was a mistake if you didn’t return with proof.
I'm perfectly at ease with this technology, shoplifting is a scourge on all of us and anything that reduces (within reason) is a plus in my book. I wouldn't mind shops that scan a payment card on the way in for example.
I can sympathise with the woman in the BBC story, but she presumably ended up getting an apology from the store and the technology provider is no longer doing business with them.
0 -
It doesn't matter who makes the mistake and it's not the matter of the data (although I'd rather they didn't), it's the data plus a marker that you are shoplifter.booneruk said:It's a mistake made by a human, not the technology and what data is uploaded? it's going to be a a 3d map of your face, so not quite your bank account details.
If such methods are to be implemented there should be an independent process for those falsely labelled to seek redress or at the very least a requirement for the act of theft to actually have occurred before the marker is placed.
In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces1 -
I wouldn’t be presuming that, And the technology provider is almost certainly still doing business with the relevant store chain.booneruk said:
It's a mistake made by a human, not the technology and what data is uploaded? it's going to be a a 3d map of your face, so not quite your bank account details.
It's not that a mistake was made, it's that a mistake may be made and without any due process your information can be uploaded to database labelling you as a shoplifter, the lack of accountability is the issue.sheramber said:But they would not know it was a mistake if you didn’t return with proof.
I'm perfectly at ease with this technology, shoplifting is a scourge on all of us and anything that reduces (within reason) is a plus in my book. I wouldn't mind shops that scan a payment card on the way in for example.
I can sympathise with the woman in the BBC story, but she presumably ended up getting an apology from the store and the technology provider is no longer doing business with them.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.1 -
Next time just wear a blue face covering.0
-
But why blue?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

