We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
I was refused entry in a local B&M store today
Options
Comments
-
Scary stuff really, I was stopped at Coop, after loading the shopping in the car, went back to return the basket and a guy said "you didn't pay for the box of chocolates".
I whipped out the receipt, he went off inside briefly and returned to say "oh yes you did".
Now, aside from the false accusation which could have been phrased as a question and lack of an apology for his mistake, had I not returned the basket would you get banned for something like this?
I know any shop can refuse service but why would they really want to lose a loyal customer who has shopped in their store for over 10 years because a member of staff made a mistake.
Rights and wrongs of facial recognition aside, this idea of being falsely labelled as guilty without it being proven through a verified system undermines the basic principles of our freedoms in a (so-called) democracy.In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces2 -
But they would not know it was a mistake if you didn’t return with proof.0
-
sheramber said:But they would not know it was a mistake if you didn’t return with proof.In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces4
-
sheramber said:But they would not know it was a mistake if you didn’t return with proof.
I'm perfectly at ease with this technology, shoplifting is a scourge on all of us and anything that reduces (within reason) is a plus in my book. I wouldn't mind shops that scan a payment card on the way in for example.
I can sympathise with the woman in the BBC story, but she presumably ended up getting an apology from the store and the technology provider is no longer doing business with them.
0 -
booneruk said:It's a mistake made by a human, not the technology and what data is uploaded? it's going to be a a 3d map of your face, so not quite your bank account details.
If such methods are to be implemented there should be an independent process for those falsely labelled to seek redress or at the very least a requirement for the act of theft to actually have occurred before the marker is placed.
In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces1 -
booneruk said:sheramber said:But they would not know it was a mistake if you didn’t return with proof.
I'm perfectly at ease with this technology, shoplifting is a scourge on all of us and anything that reduces (within reason) is a plus in my book. I wouldn't mind shops that scan a payment card on the way in for example.
I can sympathise with the woman in the BBC story, but she presumably ended up getting an apology from the store and the technology provider is no longer doing business with them.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.1 -
Next time just wear a blue face covering.0
-
But why blue?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards