We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Fitbit sense and versa 3 overheating issues.
Comments
-
Fitbit have replaced the faulty one. The OP doesn’t like the one they have sent as the replacement.0
-
Hi, it's not a case of not liking it, the replacment has had a forced update that has rendered the replacment not as described and not at a satisfactory condition.sheramber said:Fitbit have replaced the faulty one. The OP doesn’t like the one they have sent as the replacement.0 -
Although I return to my point that you don’t actually know that yours is not as described or in an unsatisfactory condition because you haven’t tested it.troberts said:
Hi, it's not a case of not liking it, the replacment has had a forced update that has rendered the replacment not as described and not at a satisfactory condition.sheramber said:Fitbit have replaced the faulty one. The OP doesn’t like the one they have sent as the replacement.You’ve had three years worth out of the other one, the battery would be potentially starting to go anyway, you’ve had a new replacement although you believe it is not as good and you’ve been offered $50 compensation. I would suggest any claim at the moment is a nonstarter.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.5 -
Hi, I completely understand, although my battery was still very good as I have looked after it and still lasts 4-5 days depending on how much i exercise. My problem is fitbit have known about this problem as it is an inherent issue with the devices effected. Thus forced update is only a mask to pre ent the battery from charging to 100% thus hopefully stopping any overheating. My concern is the device is a ticking burn bomb, when a battery goes into thermal runaway there is now stopping it. I definitely do not want this in my wrist. Very dangerous.elsien said:
Although I return to my point that you don’t actually know that yours is not as described or in an unsatisfactory condition because you haven’t tested it.troberts said:
Hi, it's not a case of not liking it, the replacment has had a forced update that has rendered the replacment not as described and not at a satisfactory condition.sheramber said:Fitbit have replaced the faulty one. The OP doesn’t like the one they have sent as the replacement.You’ve had three years worth out of the other one, the battery would be potentially starting to go anyway, you’ve had a new replacement although you believe it is not as good and you’ve been offered $50 compensation. I would suggest any claim at the moment is a nonstarter.0 -
Is the replacement watch that the OP has plus the £50 compensation under the manufacturer's warranty, or under consumer rights?
Under warranty, the manufacturer can have any terms they choose.
Under consumer rights I am not sure the OP would get much at all for a 3-year old fitness tracker. That really seems to be about the lifetime of this type of product.0 -
Don't wear it, then. Dramatising the possible consequences of an item you haven't even tried yet is not the way to a successful claim. As elsien says, you're jumping to a conclusion based on other people's experience and now introducing a health and safety what-if to your argument. I think you've had what might be described as betterment already. I don't think you're going to get the full refund you're after, unless you can negotiate one as a goodwill gesture. You're certainly not entitled to one, and chucking in stuff about burned wrists is unlikely to generate goodwill.troberts said:
Hi, I completely understand, although my battery was still very good as I have looked after it and still lasts 4-5 days depending on how much i exercise. My problem is fitbit have known about this problem as it is an inherent issue with the devices effected. Thus forced update is only a mask to pre ent the battery from charging to 100% thus hopefully stopping any overheating. My concern is the device is a ticking burn bomb, when a battery goes into thermal runaway there is now stopping it. I definitely do not want this in my wrist. Very dangerous.elsien said:
Although I return to my point that you don’t actually know that yours is not as described or in an unsatisfactory condition because you haven’t tested it.troberts said:
Hi, it's not a case of not liking it, the replacment has had a forced update that has rendered the replacment not as described and not at a satisfactory condition.sheramber said:Fitbit have replaced the faulty one. The OP doesn’t like the one they have sent as the replacement.You’ve had three years worth out of the other one, the battery would be potentially starting to go anyway, you’ve had a new replacement although you believe it is not as good and you’ve been offered $50 compensation. I would suggest any claim at the moment is a nonstarter.
If you're determined to start some sort of collective campaign, facebook is probably the best place to seek people in a similar situation. There will be all sorts of running groups where you could scout for recruits. Just remember to keep things factual and avoid straying into libellous territory.1 -
Batteries tend to only go into thermal runaway when being charged. Which will not be on your wrist.troberts said:
Hi, I completely understand, although my battery was still very good as I have looked after it and still lasts 4-5 days depending on how much i exercise. My problem is fitbit have known about this problem as it is an inherent issue with the devices effected. Thus forced update is only a mask to pre ent the battery from charging to 100% thus hopefully stopping any overheating. My concern is the device is a ticking burn bomb, when a battery goes into thermal runaway there is now stopping it. I definitely do not want this in my wrist. Very dangerous.elsien said:
Although I return to my point that you don’t actually know that yours is not as described or in an unsatisfactory condition because you haven’t tested it.troberts said:
Hi, it's not a case of not liking it, the replacment has had a forced update that has rendered the replacment not as described and not at a satisfactory condition.sheramber said:Fitbit have replaced the faulty one. The OP doesn’t like the one they have sent as the replacement.You’ve had three years worth out of the other one, the battery would be potentially starting to go anyway, you’ve had a new replacement although you believe it is not as good and you’ve been offered $50 compensation. I would suggest any claim at the moment is a nonstarter.
End of the day, Fit Bit has a one year warranty. They did not have to replace these devices.
Life in the slow lane0 -
Or not, most runners would likely have a Garmin device.Aylesbury_Duck said:There will be all sorts of running groups where you could scout for recruits.1 -
True. I've switched to Coros after many years with Garmin. Before that I had a TomTom.Grumpy_chap said:
Or not, most runners would likely have a Garmin device.Aylesbury_Duck said:There will be all sorts of running groups where you could scout for recruits.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
