We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Rate my SIPP - ITV high conviction

Options
11617192122

Comments

  • barnstar2077
    barnstar2077 Posts: 1,650 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 5 April at 10:37AM
    Back to my point about diversification though…

    VWRL is a pretty solid and common choice as a passive ‘whole world tracker’ (I bet many MSEers hold it) but I wonder how many investors actually look under the hood?
    https://www.hl.co.uk/shares/shares-search-results/v/vanguard-ftse-all-world-ucits-etf-usd-dist

    Firstly, most starkly, it has to have a 62%weighting to US stocks - that’s just the reality of global tracking.
    The next down doesn’t even come close, Japan at 5%.

    Then looking at how it actually tracks the US, as I mentioned above it’s forced to hold mainly tech, Apple, NVIDIA, Microsoft etc etc. 

    And I would guess that this isn’t isolated to VWRL and infact many ‘global trackers’ have become proxy tech investments - which is why recent events have hit so hard for so many. 

    What I think I’m trying to say is that - yes whilst my concentrated portfolio is very risky right now - the answer isn’t simply buying global trackers instead as their diversity is questionable. Building a TRULY diversified portfolio is actually not that easy and inevitably we will skew towards eg large cap or small cap or a particular sector or region - and further it then needs regular attention to maintain the diversification we all ultimately think ‘is the right thing to do’. 

    Maybe recent events are a good opportunity for everyone to review how diversified their own portfolios really are…





    Most of the popular global funds are meant to be more reflective of the stock market as a whole, with the ratio for each country deciding it's weighting, and individual company stocks based on how much of that country's market consists of that holding.

    Yes, they are heavily into the US and tech and finance at the moment, because they have been very profitable sectors.  Don't forget that these funds are self balancing, as one company slips down the ladder another will rise up to take it's place.  As an investor in that fund you will lose money on the company and sector going down, but will be rubbing your hands together at the company you have been buying cheaply on it's way up!

    What would be the alternative look like?

    A quick google tells me there are 17 common sectors. 

    Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, Mining, Manufacturing, Construction, Finance, Retail, Healthcare, Education, Hospitality, Transportation, Media & Entertainment, Technology & Information, and Research & Development.

    If you tried to make a fund based equally among countries and sectors it wouldn't make a lot of money.

    Edit:  I guess I have made a good argument for why these globally diverse 100% equity funds are great for accumulation, but why diversification into bonds and MMF etc maybe a good idea once you stop adding to the pot.
    Think first of your goal, then make it happen!
  • FIREDreamer
    FIREDreamer Posts: 1,002 Forumite
    500 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    It’s held up better than my globally diversified sipp though it hasn’t been fully dementia don proof!
    Hi FIRED, yeah everything’s taken a hit hasn’t it, though I’ve benefited very slightly with my approach of occasionally selling a few and buying back, but overall down like everyone else of course. 

    And we can all take our own view on whether his tariff plan will have to be rowed back a little, anything could happen…

    Your comment about your globally diversified SIPP got me thinking though - how has my portfolio as posted 10th Feb on page 1 done since then compared to a global tracker? There is a common comfort taken from ‘feeling diversified’ but does this actually hold up when such trackers have a huge US focus (typically 60%+?) which inevitably also puts them into things like big tech. 

    So whilst it’s too short a period to form any meaningful conclusions I decided to compare to a common tracker I’ve owned in the past - VWRL (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF).

    10th Feb 2025, ITV 77.45
    10th Feb 2025, VWRL 115.17

    4th April 2025, ITV 70.90
    4th April 2025, VWRL 97.36

    ITV loses 8.46%
    VWRL loses 15.46%

    Interesting. Perhaps that’s why there are no new comments laughing at me - because people have checked their own portfolios first! ;)

    Who knows where this will all go next. Fun times. 

    (Edited to add I think VWRL had a small 46cent dividend in March, so 36p?)
    (And ITV goes ex-div very soon on 10th April which will take a whopping 3.3p out - I say whopping as this is paying 4.6% vs 70.9p, so will have to include this in any future comparisons)
    I don’t think anyone was laughing at you, more concerned about the risk of the pension fund collapsing if anything bad happened. Remember Marconi and a few other companies which lost over 99% of their value.

    Anyway here’s a bit of schadenfreude …


  • ooSTEVEoo
    ooSTEVEoo Posts: 29 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Still got all ITV Juno? Must be looking healthy at the moment. 
  • ooSTEVEoo
    ooSTEVEoo Posts: 29 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Good effort! I’m still holding 538,849 shares. I sold 30,000 and reinvested the dividend elsewhere but these are still a significant part of my portfolio. Low twenties % of my portfolio. I am losing my patience a bit but will hold tight a little longer. Good luck. 
  • k6chris
    k6chris Posts: 784 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    In honour of this thread I am going to buy 100 ITV shares on Monday.  #YOLO
    "For every complicated problem, there is always a simple, wrong answer"
  • TheTelltaleChart
    TheTelltaleChart Posts: 61 Forumite
    10 Posts
    OP, how would your life plans change if ITV went bust?
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,676 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    OP, how would your life plans change if ITV went bust?
    its a sensible question.

    I have known a number of single share owners over the years. Usually built up from profit shares and SAYE.   Many were £1m+ in value and went on to lose the lot or most of them in the credit crunch.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Cobbler_tone
    Cobbler_tone Posts: 1,033 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I admire the kahunas of someone to go all in on a single organisation. You could argue an institution like ITV is unlikely to go belly up and they are cheap shares, so you hope you’d get a window to get out. Dividends are an important factor too.
    If it were me (and I was that way inclined) I’d probably choose Coca Cola or their main bottler. The bottler is up 148% over the past 5 years vs the 14% of ITV. I like sleeping too much though.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.