MET Parking Stansted Starbucks after closing

parkingoffender

@Coupon-mad Could a contract with the landowner from the PPC override Schedule 4 of POFA? Ie. if the contract specified that the parking lot IS relevant land, just because it says so there?

Coupon-mad

No. Here's the rule - point 4:

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a79d6be40f0b670a8025ccb/guidance-unpaid-parking-charges.pdf

parkingoffender

@LazosOk I submitted a complaint to POPLA as @Coupon-mad suggested and received a reply back from them supporting their decision (*owen wilson wow* gif goes here). The stated justification was that the contract  provided by the operator states the parking lot is relevant land, and that the operator is really really confident that it's relevant land, and just because it's a piece of land around an airport it doesn't mean it's subject to the byelaws.

Needless to say, I thanked them for their efforts in jest and completed the public consultation.

Coupon-mad

parkingoffender said:

@LazosOk I submitted a complaint to POPLA as @Coupon-mad suggested and received a reply back from them supporting their decision (*owen wilson wow* gif goes here). The stated justification was that the contract  provided by the operator states the parking lot is relevant land, and that the operator is really really confident that it's relevant land, and just because it's a piece of land around an airport it doesn't mean it's subject to the byelaws.

Needless to say, I thanked them for their efforts in jest and completed the public consultation.

Nice.

How flipping inconsistent POPLA are on a point of law that is black and white. This was posted today:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6627452/popla-decision-southgate-park