We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Not parked within the bay.
Comments
-
Still staying silent..
Another letter..
I also got an SMS, not sure how they got my number.
0 -
How many times does it need to be said?
The fourth post of the NEWBIES thread explains exactly how to deal with debt collector's letters, but to summarise that post - ignore them.
That's three times I've written that on this one thread.
Please don't show us any more debt collector's letters.2 -
I know and like I typed, I'm ignoring. Calm down man.
I'm just putting the flow in so, if it happens to someone else, they can see the process and quantity of letters.
4 -
Court claim has come
0 -
Do the AOS online on MCOL by logging in via the government gateway, details are in the newbies sticky thread in announcements near the top of the forum
Then, later this week, study the template defence by coupon mad in announcements, once it's been updated this week, due her removing some parts etc1 -
Yep I will do the new template defence this week - shorter - as I'm about to go on holiday & am aware it is needed.
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD2 -
Thank you. Will have a read and do the AOS0
-
I have done the AOS, thanks both.. Pretty straightforward so far.0
-
Is this a good enough response for Paragraph 3 in my defence?
3. Referring to the POC: paragraph 1 is denied. The Defendant is
not indebted to the Claimant. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant
does not accept that a contravention occurred on 24/12/2024, as
alleged. Whilst the Defendant was the registered keeper and
driver, paragraphs 3 and 4 are denied. The Defendant is not liable
and has seen no evidence of a breach of prominent terms. The
quantum is hugely exaggerated (no PCN can be £170 on private land)
and there were no damages incurred whatsoever.
3.1. The Defendant briefly parked in the position alleged only to
avoid a hazardous area containing broken glass on the ground,
prioritising the safety of their children. This action was taken
reasonably and in good faith to prevent potential injury or
damage, and does not constitute a wilful or negligent breach of
any parking terms.
0 -
@pda Thanks for starting this thread and meticulously documenting everything that's happened so far on this along with images of the letters coming through in the post.
I'm on letter 2 of a UKPC "fine" for the exact same reason in a supermarket parking lot and expect it to follow the same path as yours. Studiously ignoring everything until it gets to a claim.. Bookmarked your thread and wish you luck!I am a Mortgage Adviser - You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards