We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Thomson Reuters return of capital
niklas19
Posts: 5 Forumite
I'm holding a small amount of TRI stock which last year distributed a "return of capital". For each share there's a distribution of around $4 per share and a reverse stock buyback. As a result each share was replaced by $4 cash distribution and a fraction of a new shares. After the distribution the portfolio value didn't change.
I'm wondering how to declare that on self assessment? It makes me think that this is a cost-basis reduction and should be treated in terms of CGT but not sure whether this is income (like dividends) or capital.
The whole operation has been described in details by reuters (google: Thomson Reuters return of capital) - don't want to paste links for obvious reasons.
I'm wondering how to declare that on self assessment? It makes me think that this is a cost-basis reduction and should be treated in terms of CGT but not sure whether this is income (like dividends) or capital.
The whole operation has been described in details by reuters (google: Thomson Reuters return of capital) - don't want to paste links for obvious reasons.
0
Comments
-
Is there a prospectus or suchlike relating to this? Usually there’s a tax section in them that’ll give you an idea of how it should be treated.niklas19 said:I'm holding a small amount of TRI stock which last year distributed a "return of capital". For each share there's a distribution of around $4 per share and a reverse stock buyback. As a result each share was replaced by $4 cash distribution and a fraction of a new shares. After the distribution the portfolio value didn't change.
I'm wondering how to declare that on self assessment? It makes me think that this is a cost-basis reduction and should be treated in terms of CGT but not sure whether this is income (like dividends) or capital.
The whole operation has been described in details by reuters (google: Thomson Reuters return of capital) - don't want to paste links for obvious reasons.0 -
No, your reasons for not wanting to paste links aren't obvious at all!niklas19 said:The whole operation has been described in details by reuters (google: Thomson Reuters return of capital) - don't want to paste links for obvious reasons.
There is a separate matter of potentially not being able to, as a new poster, although that's easily worked around with some editing of the URL to prevent it being recognised as a link by the forum software, e.g. replacing 'https' with 'hxxps'.1 -
@wmb194 yes, there is. There's management circular that describes tax implications from Canadian tax standpoint (since TRI is domiciled in Canada).
hxxps://ir.thomsonreuters.com/static-files/b081cdf4-2b14-4531-b945-e40f7357393e
Page 129: “Non-Canadian Resident Shareholders”.
It states that there should be no liability from Canadian tax standpoint but I just want to confirm if that reasoning would apply to UK tax as well.0 -
It is a long standing problem for investors holding shares quoted on foreign markets. The prospectus issued on capital reorganisations such as the current example, will tend to only address the domestic tax implications for investors where the security is listed.wmb194 said:
Is there a prospectus or suchlike relating to this? Usually there’s a tax section in them that’ll give you an idea of how it should be treated.niklas19 said:I'm holding a small amount of TRI stock which last year distributed a "return of capital". For each share there's a distribution of around $4 per share and a reverse stock buyback. As a result each share was replaced by $4 cash distribution and a fraction of a new shares. After the distribution the portfolio value didn't change.
I'm wondering how to declare that on self assessment? It makes me think that this is a cost-basis reduction and should be treated in terms of CGT but not sure whether this is income (like dividends) or capital.
The whole operation has been described in details by reuters (google: Thomson Reuters return of capital) - don't want to paste links for obvious reasons.
In the present example it is a Canadian holding so, Canadian tax rules would be covered. There is no automatic read across of the Canadian tax rules to the UK, so any statement related to Canadian taxes, does not necessarily apply to the UK treatment of the transaction.
For the UK perspective, one must go back to first principles as set out in primary tax legislation as varied by case law - see HMRC internal manual below on foreign company dividends and distributions.
https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/savings-and-investment-manual/saim5210
Understandably, navigating these complicated rules is the natural preserve of tax accountants rather than amateur investors.
In the OP's case, given he states the amounts applying to him are relatively small, therefore rather than paying for specialist advice he could take a pragmatic view and treat the cash received as an untaxed foreign dividend with no associated foreign tax credit.
OP, would you pay dividend tax at 8.75% or 33.75% on this basis?0 -
OP, would you pay dividend tax at 8.75% or 33.75% on this basis?I could take that approach without delving into details of this particular distribution just to be on the safe side - as I said, my holding is rather modest and the aforementioned distribution, in my case, is literally ~$50.
There's no foreign tax deducted at source. I'd still prefer to understand though if this is income or capital gains just for future reference and even though the tax implication would be probably <£10 if I take the dividend route, why pay it if I don't have to?0 -
Often these multi-nationals - and this one used to have a secondary London listing - will cover multiple jurisdictions and there is a section on US federal taxation but we're out of luck for the UK.poseidon1 said:
It is a long standing problem for investors holding shares quoted on foreign markets. The prospectus issued on capital reorganisations such as the current example, will tend to only address the domestic tax implications for investors where the security is listed.wmb194 said:
Is there a prospectus or suchlike relating to this? Usually there’s a tax section in them that’ll give you an idea of how it should be treated.niklas19 said:I'm holding a small amount of TRI stock which last year distributed a "return of capital". For each share there's a distribution of around $4 per share and a reverse stock buyback. As a result each share was replaced by $4 cash distribution and a fraction of a new shares. After the distribution the portfolio value didn't change.
I'm wondering how to declare that on self assessment? It makes me think that this is a cost-basis reduction and should be treated in terms of CGT but not sure whether this is income (like dividends) or capital.
The whole operation has been described in details by reuters (google: Thomson Reuters return of capital) - don't want to paste links for obvious reasons.
In the present example it is a Canadian holding so, Canadian tax rules would be covered. There is no automatic read across of the Canadian tax rules to the UK, so any statement related to Canadian taxes, does not necessarily apply to the UK treatment of the transaction.
For the UK perspective, one must go back to first principles as set out in primary tax legislation as varied by case law - see HMRC internal manual below on foreign company dividends and distributions.
https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/savings-and-investment-manual/saim5210
Understandably, navigating these complicated rules is the natural preserve of tax accountants rather than amateur investors.
In the OP's case, given he states the amounts applying to him are relatively small, therefore rather than paying for specialist advice he could take a pragmatic view and treat the cash received as an untaxed foreign dividend with no associated foreign tax credit.
OP, would you pay dividend tax at 8.75% or 33.75% on this basis?0 -
I hear you, but to get definitive and accurate advice you would need to pay for it.niklas19 said:OP, would you pay dividend tax at 8.75% or 33.75% on this basis?I could take that approach without delving into details of this particular distribution just to be on the safe side - as I said, my holding is rather modest and the aforementioned distribution, in my case, is literally ~$50.
There's no foreign tax deducted at source. I'd still prefer to understand though if this is income or capital gains just for future reference and even though the tax implication would be probably <£10 if I take the dividend route, why pay it if I don't have to?
Very unlikely to find anyone on this forum either sufficiently qualified or willing to delve into a foreign prospectus to understand how HMRC would treat a foreign company reorganisation distribution.
You need to decide whether retaining such a small direct investment in a foreign company, is worth all the attendant hassle and head scratching moments. I had to make such a decision with an American investment ( which shrunk substantially in value ) and decided in the end to offload it.1 -
From the HMRC SAIM5210 link Poseidon provided: "The question is whether or not the ‘corpus of the asset’ is left intact after the distribution. If not, the receipt will be a capital receipt; if it is, the payment will be chargeable as income. The corpus is not disturbed by payment of a large dividend simply because it is large - see HMRC v First Nationwide [2012] EWCA Civ 278."niklas19 said:OP, would you pay dividend tax at 8.75% or 33.75% on this basis?I could take that approach without delving into details of this particular distribution just to be on the safe side - as I said, my holding is rather modest and the aforementioned distribution, in my case, is literally ~$50.
There's no foreign tax deducted at source. I'd still prefer to understand though if this is income or capital gains just for future reference and even though the tax implication would be probably <£10 if I take the dividend route, why pay it if I don't have to?
The 'corpus' of TRI remains so for what it's worth I'd say this is a foreign dividend.0 -
@wmb194 Researching this topic, I've found similar answer here:
hxxps://www.accountingweb.co.uk/any-answers/return-of-capital-on-overseas-share
I'm not sure how to understand the "corpus" and what impacts it. In this case, TRI is distributing capital from proceeds of LSEG transaction where it disposed its stake in other company, so I guess that impacts the corpus?0 -
I would say not materially, the business continues for the most part as normal and it currently has a C$102bn market cap.niklas19 said:@wmb194 Researching this topic, I've found similar answer here:
hxxps://www.accountingweb.co.uk/any-answers/return-of-capital-on-overseas-share
I'm not sure how to understand the "corpus" and what impacts it. In this case, TRI is distributing capital from proceeds of LSEG transaction where it disposed its stake in other company, so I guess that impacts the corpus?
"The corpus is not disturbed by payment of a large dividend simply because it is large - see HMRC v First Nationwide [2012] EWCA Civ 278."0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
