We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Really?
Comments
-
No, the point at which the bulk of the water is at boiling point is when it stops getting louder.Ildhund said:
And my last kettle-boiling-energy-saving tip: once the bubbles start rising from the bottom of the kettle, the water is at 100° and any electricity consumed after that point is simply converting water at 100° to vapour, to no advantage that I can see.0 -
Two and half minutes in 800W microwave, using the mug I am going to drink out of, works perfectly for me, anyone want to buy an electric kettle?1
-
I never drink tea, only coffee which is spoilt if you use boiling water. For lazy instant I put the milk and water in a mug, bung it in the microwave and 1 minute 45 seconds later stir in the coffee granules. For filter coffee I pour however many mugs of water into the coffee maker - so not a drop is wasted. For anything that requires me to use the electric kettle I put in just the amount of water I need - a mugful, half a pint, a litre or whatever. For very small amounts I use a mug in the microwave. My parents raised me not to waste money on anything - they certainly did not let me believe it would be a good idea to leave the dog watching TV!wrf12345 said:Two and half minutes in 800W microwave, using the mug I am going to drink out of, works perfectly for me, anyone want to buy an electric kettle?
Consensus here seems to be that people ARE stupid enought not to know that most things in life have a price unless it is spelt out to them by Nanny. I give everyone the benefit of the doubt that they are NOT so stupid as to believe electricity or gas grows on trees.0 -
There is a risk of serious burns if some of the water superheats and explodes when disturbed. There's also no guarantee that all the water is raised to the same temperature.wrf12345 said:Two and half minutes in 800W microwave, using the mug I am going to drink out of, works perfectly for me, anyone want to buy an electric kettle?1 -
That can't be right surely? The 'in home' display is plugged in to a socket within the house, so will be billed as per any other item plugged in to a socket (unless you have one that runs on batteries in which case you need to provide cost of batteries). I understand the meter itself will be upstream but cant see how the home display (which costs £2 pa to run) can not be added to bill.Gerry1 said:
Nope. Its supply is upstream of the metering element so it won't go on your bill.kassy64 said:I haven't got a smart meter yet, but I've read they use about £2 of energy per year themselves0 -
But you were talking about the actual smart meter in your post.4
-
I'd like to see the data that resulted in that conclusion. When I measured our IHD power draw, it was less than 0.1W. At current SVT ~25p/kWh (my region, Eastern) 0.1W power draw would cost c.22p in a year.kassy64 said:
That can't be right surely? The 'in home' display is plugged in to a socket within the house, so will be billed as per any other item plugged in to a socket (unless you have one that runs on batteries in which case you need to provide cost of batteries). I understand the meter itself will be upstream but cant see how the home display (which costs £2 pa to run) can not be added to bill.Gerry1 said:
Nope. Its supply is upstream of the metering element so it won't go on your bill.kassy64 said:I haven't got a smart meter yet, but I've read they use about £2 of energy per year themselves0 -
I've measured the power consumption on my IHD and it is less than half a watt, momentarily, and then too little to measure. So about 4kWh/annum which would cost me about 60p. As the smart meter is saving me about £600/annum, compared to SVT, I don't begrudge the minuscule "service fee". And you don't have to have the IHD switched on to save money.kassy64 said:
That can't be right surely? The 'in home' display is plugged in to a socket within the house, so will be billed as per any other item plugged in to a socket (unless you have one that runs on batteries in which case you need to provide cost of batteries). I understand the meter itself will be upstream but cant see how the home display (which costs £2 pa to run) can not be added to bill.Gerry1 said:
Nope. Its supply is upstream of the metering element so it won't go on your bill.kassy64 said:I haven't got a smart meter yet, but I've read they use about £2 of energy per year themselves1 -
A microwave is only some 50-66% efficient*, so using an electric kettle (at ~98% efficiency) would work out a lot cheaper for the same quantity of water.pseudodox said: For very small amounts I use a mug in the microwave. My parents raised me not to waste money on anything*) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_oven - Scroll down to Energy Consumption.
Any language construct that forces such insanity in this case should be abandoned without regrets. –
Erik Aronesty, 2014
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178K Life & Family
- 260.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
