Amazon court case

PHK

Autumn2024 said:

PHK said:

Sarahspangles said:

Autumn2024 said:

@Aylesbury_Duck, thank you! posting on this thread is doing wonders for me in terms of getting it out of my system!

Okay in case it’s useful! There are actually names for people who won’t accept the reasonable outcome of a complaint or case, who keep trying to pursue the same issue or organisation in different ways. ‘Vexatious litigants’ get a kind of enjoyment out of wasting everyone’s time including their own. ‘Querulants’ don’t even enjoy the ride, so they’re more sad than bad, and sometimes they’re even a bit mad. Or end up that way.

Even if you’re right, and not getting something completely out of proportion, it’s still better to move on. At the end of the day, the best revenge is to live well.

Can I sue the OP for the upset and annoyance caused by the OP repeatedly refusing to quantify the loss they’ve claimed to have suffered? 

Thats not meant maliciously but OP if you want advice about a loss, you need to state what that loss is and how Amazon’s actions caused it. 

PHK, Yes, please go ahead and sue me! Do you just post for the sake of scoring points? If you bothered to read a thread before commenting it, you wouldn't waste your time typing your response. Why contribute If you have nothing constructive to add? I don't mind negative and critical responses, on the contrary - they help to look at things at a different angle. But why post if you didn't even take time to read the post? 

I did read all of the posts and you have not quantified your loss. Indeed, you took the opportunity to attack me rather than quantify your loss. Many people would draw adverse inference from that. 

If you don't state what the loss is and how Amazon's actions caused it then you will fail in court. 

Undervalued

PHK said:

Autumn2024 said:

PHK said:

Sarahspangles said:

Autumn2024 said:

@Aylesbury_Duck, thank you! posting on this thread is doing wonders for me in terms of getting it out of my system!

Okay in case it’s useful! There are actually names for people who won’t accept the reasonable outcome of a complaint or case, who keep trying to pursue the same issue or organisation in different ways. ‘Vexatious litigants’ get a kind of enjoyment out of wasting everyone’s time including their own. ‘Querulants’ don’t even enjoy the ride, so they’re more sad than bad, and sometimes they’re even a bit mad. Or end up that way.

Even if you’re right, and not getting something completely out of proportion, it’s still better to move on. At the end of the day, the best revenge is to live well.

Can I sue the OP for the upset and annoyance caused by the OP repeatedly refusing to quantify the loss they’ve claimed to have suffered? 

Thats not meant maliciously but OP if you want advice about a loss, you need to state what that loss is and how Amazon’s actions caused it. 

PHK, Yes, please go ahead and sue me! Do you just post for the sake of scoring points? If you bothered to read a thread before commenting it, you wouldn't waste your time typing your response. Why contribute If you have nothing constructive to add? I don't mind negative and critical responses, on the contrary - they help to look at things at a different angle. But why post if you didn't even take time to read the post? 

I did read all of the posts and you have not quantified your loss. Indeed, you took the opportunity to attack me rather than quantify your loss. Many people would draw adverse inference from that. 

If you don't state what the loss is and how Amazon's actions caused it then you will fail in court. 

Exactly ^^^

Plus, in any claim, the OP would be expected to have taken any reasonable steps to minimise their losses. Just because the other party is at fault doesn't give the claimant the right to run them up as big a bill as possible in retaliation and no UK court will countenance that.

sheramber

PHK said:

Autumn2024 said:

PHK said:

Sarahspangles said:

Autumn2024 said:

@Aylesbury_Duck, thank you! posting on this thread is doing wonders for me in terms of getting it out of my system!

Okay in case it’s useful! There are actually names for people who won’t accept the reasonable outcome of a complaint or case, who keep trying to pursue the same issue or organisation in different ways. ‘Vexatious litigants’ get a kind of enjoyment out of wasting everyone’s time including their own. ‘Querulants’ don’t even enjoy the ride, so they’re more sad than bad, and sometimes they’re even a bit mad. Or end up that way.

Even if you’re right, and not getting something completely out of proportion, it’s still better to move on. At the end of the day, the best revenge is to live well.

Can I sue the OP for the upset and annoyance caused by the OP repeatedly refusing to quantify the loss they’ve claimed to have suffered? 

Thats not meant maliciously but OP if you want advice about a loss, you need to state what that loss is and how Amazon’s actions caused it. 

PHK, Yes, please go ahead and sue me! Do you just post for the sake of scoring points? If you bothered to read a thread before commenting it, you wouldn't waste your time typing your response. Why contribute If you have nothing constructive to add? I don't mind negative and critical responses, on the contrary - they help to look at things at a different angle. But why post if you didn't even take time to read the post? 

I did read all of the posts and you have not quantified your loss. Indeed, you took the opportunity to attack me rather than quantify your loss. Many people would draw adverse inference from that. 

If you don't state what the loss is and how Amazon's actions caused it then you will fail in court. 

The Op has already failed. The judge dismissed the case.