We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Mandatory refund of up to £85k for APP fraud
Comments
-
So if a close relative of yours was scammed out of £25,000 would you be arguing that the bank shouldn't refund them?M25 said:poshrule_uk said:
Is someone's with dementia stupid?M25 said:No personal responsibility at all, then? A crazy route to go down.How will stupid people learn?ALL stupid people. Banks aren't health or mental well-being care providers.I think we all know most people who are scammed have acted stupidly.0 -
I feel that the unintended consequences of this will be wide-reaching and negatively impact a lot of us.HillStreetBlues said:At what point is there an end to "free banking" as we currently know it?1 -
That's not true, and it's not helpful to say that. Some people who get scammed are stupid I'm sure. Some are greedy. Others aren't. I have seen bank employees get scammed. I have seen a police officer get scammed. Saying it only happens to the stupid causes people to let their guard down, because most people don't self identify as stupid.M25 said:poshrule_uk said:
Is someone's with dementia stupid?M25 said:No personal responsibility at all, then? A crazy route to go down.How will stupid people learn?ALL stupid people. Banks aren't health or mental well-being care providers.I think we all know most people who are scammed have acted stupidly.
In the past, a bank's only obligation was to make sure a transaction was properly authorised and didn't break any laws. Customers whose transactions were blocked or delayed had a legitimate complaint. In the same past, a customer who signed an agreement for a loan or insurance product was 'fair game', even if they did not understand what they were signing up to, even if they had been deliberarly misled by the sales person.
The world has changed now.5 -
In this story there is a lecturer in financial markets who got scammed.TheBanker said:
That's not true, and it's not helpful to say that. Some people who get scammed are stupid I'm sure. Some are greedy. Others aren't. I have seen bank employees get scammed. I have seen a police officer get scammed.M25 said:poshrule_uk said:
Is someone's with dementia stupid?M25 said:No personal responsibility at all, then? A crazy route to go down.How will stupid people learn?ALL stupid people. Banks aren't health or mental well-being care providers.I think we all know most people who are scammed have acted stupidly.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy94vz4zd7zo.amp
2 -
It doesn't matter what someone's job is or anything else about them, it's about their actions.Are we not responsible any more for our actions? No liability or responsibility? Do we want to be treated like 5 year olds? Yes, it seems so.It's already annoying using banking with one time passwordss and PINs and these new restrictions (that's what it'll be) will make banking even more annoying.There was a story on the news about a 'computer expert' who was scammed. He had made disastrous choices (£150,000 loss) and made decisions he should be responsible for. His bank -ie us- will now pay for his stupidity. The interviewer failed to ask him if he thought he was to blame.The regulations also sound like fraudsters' paradise. Whiplash claims without leaving your computer chair.
1 -
Your link doesn’t give much detail about the lectuer’s case though it strikes me as a mystery why someone who lectures others in financial markets would download software because a stranger asks them to do so. I wouldn’t be surprised if she admitted (obviously not to the bank and the FOS) it was stupid to do so.Rob5342 said:
In this story there is a lecturer in financial markets who got scammed.TheBanker said:
That's not true, and it's not helpful to say that. Some people who get scammed are stupid I'm sure. Some are greedy. Others aren't. I have seen bank employees get scammed. I have seen a police officer get scammed.M25 said:poshrule_uk said:
Is someone's with dementia stupid?M25 said:No personal responsibility at all, then? A crazy route to go down.How will stupid people learn?ALL stupid people. Banks aren't health or mental well-being care providers.I think we all know most people who are scammed have acted stupidly.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy94vz4zd7zo.amp1 -
The trouble with most reporting about fraud of this type is everyone knows all banks are evil so they're always in the wrong. As banks have to follow privacy laws there may be little they can say, but a customer is free to tell their abridged side of the storyfriolento said:
Your link doesn’t give much detail about the lectuer’s case though it strikes me as a mystery why someone who lectures others in financial markets would download software because a stranger asks them to do so. I wouldn’t be surprised if she admitted (obviously not to the bank and the FOS) it was stupid to do so.Rob5342 said:
In this story there is a lecturer in financial markets who got scammed.TheBanker said:
That's not true, and it's not helpful to say that. Some people who get scammed are stupid I'm sure. Some are greedy. Others aren't. I have seen bank employees get scammed. I have seen a police officer get scammed.M25 said:poshrule_uk said:
Is someone's with dementia stupid?M25 said:No personal responsibility at all, then? A crazy route to go down.How will stupid people learn?ALL stupid people. Banks aren't health or mental well-being care providers.I think we all know most people who are scammed have acted stupidly.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy94vz4zd7zo.amp
Let's Be Careful Out There0 -
Awful idea, we need more personal responsibility not less, especially so when the cost of things gets passed onto the rest of us.4
-
I expect that most of the cost will be passed on as lower savings rates and higher borrowing rates. If you do not borrow from the banks and keep your balances low, you are not likely to be hard hit. Nonetheless, it is going to make it more difficult to move money, and that has a direct cost if it results in delayed payments.MattMattMattUK said:Awful idea, we need more personal responsibility not less, especially so when the cost of things gets passed onto the rest of us.
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

