📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Mandatory refund of up to £85k for APP fraud

Options
1356

Comments

  • Rob5342
    Rob5342 Posts: 2,420 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    M25 said:
    M25 said:
    No personal responsibility at all, then? A crazy route to go down.

    How will stupid people learn?
    Is someone's with dementia stupid?
    ALL stupid people. Banks aren't health or mental well-being care providers.

    I think we all know most people who are scammed have acted stupidly.

    So if a close relative of yours was scammed out of £25,000 would you be arguing that the bank shouldn't refund them? 
  • Ergates
    Ergates Posts: 3,045 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    hoc said:
    Could this be a scam? Are you sure? Did someone ask you to transfer? Are you certain you want to transfer? Stop think it could be a scam? Why do you want to transfer?
    Banks already that, and people still fall for obvious scams.
  • Ergates
    Ergates Posts: 3,045 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    At what point is there an end to "free banking" as we currently know it? 
    I feel that the unintended consequences of this will be wide-reaching and negatively impact a lot of us.
  • Rob5342
    Rob5342 Posts: 2,420 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    TheBanker said:
    M25 said:
    M25 said:
    No personal responsibility at all, then? A crazy route to go down.

    How will stupid people learn?
    Is someone's with dementia stupid?
    ALL stupid people. Banks aren't health or mental well-being care providers.

    I think we all know most people who are scammed have acted stupidly.

    That's not true, and it's not helpful to say that. Some people who get scammed are stupid I'm sure. Some are greedy. Others aren't. I have seen bank employees get scammed. I have seen a police officer get scammed. 
    In this story there is a lecturer in financial markets who got scammed.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy94vz4zd7zo.amp
  • M25
    M25 Posts: 363 Forumite
    Third Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    It doesn't matter what someone's job is or anything else about them, it's about their actions.

    Are we not responsible any more for our actions? No liability or responsibility? Do we want to be treated like 5 year olds? Yes, it seems so.

    It's already annoying using banking with one time passwordss and PINs and these new restrictions (that's what it'll be) will make banking even more annoying.

    There was a story on the news about a 'computer expert' who was scammed. He had made disastrous choices (£150,000 loss) and made decisions he should be responsible for. His bank -ie us- will now pay for his stupidity. The interviewer failed to ask him if he thought he was to blame.

    The regulations also sound like fraudsters' paradise. Whiplash claims without leaving your computer chair.

  • friolento
    friolento Posts: 2,432 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Rob5342 said:
    TheBanker said:
    M25 said:
    M25 said:
    No personal responsibility at all, then? A crazy route to go down.

    How will stupid people learn?
    Is someone's with dementia stupid?
    ALL stupid people. Banks aren't health or mental well-being care providers.

    I think we all know most people who are scammed have acted stupidly.

    That's not true, and it's not helpful to say that. Some people who get scammed are stupid I'm sure. Some are greedy. Others aren't. I have seen bank employees get scammed. I have seen a police officer get scammed. 
    In this story there is a lecturer in financial markets who got scammed.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy94vz4zd7zo.amp
    Your link doesn’t give much detail about the lectuer’s case though it strikes me as a mystery why someone who lectures others in financial markets would download software because a stranger asks them to do so. I wouldn’t be surprised if she admitted (obviously not to the bank and the FOS) it was stupid to do so. 
  • HillStreetBlues
    HillStreetBlues Posts: 6,092 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Homepage Hero Photogenic
    edited 28 September 2024 at 10:37AM
    friolento said:
    Rob5342 said:
    TheBanker said:
    M25 said:
    M25 said:
    No personal responsibility at all, then? A crazy route to go down.

    How will stupid people learn?
    Is someone's with dementia stupid?
    ALL stupid people. Banks aren't health or mental well-being care providers.

    I think we all know most people who are scammed have acted stupidly.

    That's not true, and it's not helpful to say that. Some people who get scammed are stupid I'm sure. Some are greedy. Others aren't. I have seen bank employees get scammed. I have seen a police officer get scammed. 
    In this story there is a lecturer in financial markets who got scammed.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy94vz4zd7zo.amp
    Your link doesn’t give much detail about the lectuer’s case though it strikes me as a mystery why someone who lectures others in financial markets would download software because a stranger asks them to do so. I wouldn’t be surprised if she admitted (obviously not to the bank and the FOS) it was stupid to do so. 
    The trouble with most reporting about fraud of this type is everyone knows all banks are evil so they're always in the wrong. As banks have to follow privacy laws there may be little they can say, but a customer is free to tell their abridged side of the story
    Let's Be Careful Out There
  • Awful idea, we need more personal responsibility not less, especially so when the cost of things gets passed onto the rest of us.
  • GeoffTF
    GeoffTF Posts: 2,043 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 28 September 2024 at 1:13PM
    Awful idea, we need more personal responsibility not less, especially so when the cost of things gets passed onto the rest of us.
    I expect that most of the cost will be passed on as lower savings rates and higher borrowing rates. If you do not borrow from the banks and keep your balances low, you are not likely to be hard hit. Nonetheless, it is going to make it more difficult to move money, and that has a direct cost if it results in delayed payments.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.