We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
isa in two names has has been suggested by solicitor

woody2
Posts: 1 Newbie

Is this possible? Can I give my son 20k in an ISA that I have both him and I as signatories? so I have some control of his withdrawals?
0
Comments
-
Individual Savings Accounts??
Life in the slow lane3 -
You can’t have an ISA in joint names, if that’s what you mean because the tax benefits are for individuals.
And I’m not sure how you could have an ISA just in one person’s name but requiring two signatories. How old is your son and why do you want to control his spending?All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.1 -
They may be thinking about a Junior ISA where you manage the account but the child is the sole owner or beneficiary of the money0
-
ColdIron said:They may be thinking about a Junior ISA where you manage the account but the child is the sole owner or beneficiary of the money
Solicitor is talking nonsense if it's a 'normal ISA' no such thing as joint.2 -
woody2 said:Is this possible? Can I give my son 20k in an ISA that I have both him and I as signatories? so I have some control of his withdrawals?
Life in the slow lane2 -
We need to know a bit more about the situation - your son's age and why the solicitor is suggesting this.Fundamentally you can't have an ISA in Joint names, but there are situations where you could manage your child's account as a trustee, which is the situation for my kids' Junior ISA accounts. In an ISA, neither you nor the child can withdraw the money until they are 18, so is that the "control" of spending you want?0
-
Does the OP mean that she has Power of Attorney for her son?
Any ISA would still be in the sole name of the donor of the PoA but she would be recorded as Attorney.
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/how-to-open-an-isa-as-an-isa-managerApplying for an ISA on behalf of someone else
0 -
The OP may have power-of-attorney, but this is irrelevant if he has capacity around his finances because controls cannot be put in place without his consent. And which he can subsequently overturn at any time should he choose to do so.If he lacks capacity he’s not going to be able to be a joint signatory.Either way, it’s still not going to work in the way the OP wants.All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.2 -
I was thinking more of why the solicitor may have suggested that there could be two signatories on the ISA.
1 -
xylophone said:I was thinking more of why the solicitor may have suggested that there could be two signatories on the ISA.
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.1K Spending & Discounts
- 243K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards