We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Unable to carry out visa check so missed flight (in chaos on Friday)
Comments
-
Voyager2002 said:nadsat said:Voyager2002 said:Hoenir said:nadsat said:TELLIT01 said:Voyager2002 said:nadsat said:Voyager2002 said:Ryanair T and Cs are written in terms of arrival at the departure gate, so their "get lost" response is technically correct. However, they failed to perform the visa check, something that was an essential part of the service for which you had paid. A chargeback would probably succeed, but then you would be blacklisted by Ryanair.
Be clear whether the visa check should have been performed by Ryanair or by the airport, and the precise reason why it was "hopeless".
So Ryanair failed to provide the service for which they had paid. When you (they) contacted Ryanair, what exactly was the excuse for this?It may have escaped your notice but there was a massive world wide IT systems problem on Friday. Anybody who did join a check in queue had to be processed manually. That delay is beyond the control of the airlines. Ryanair may or may not be able to hide behind that. I'm sure there will be details somewhere of what has to be refunded and what doesn't.I would suspect Ryanair's take on it will be that the passenger didn't allow enough time for the visa checks to be carried out, therefore no entitlement. (I'm just playing Devil's Advocate). The fact that many IT systems weren't available and Ryanair may not have been able to check anyway may be a counter argument to that.They were in plenty of time for a visa check as usual.I would have thought the customer is in no way to blame for the unavailability of a supplier's systems and they should refund.
Leaving aside the issue of 'should', people who cannot reach the departure gate in time because of failures by the airport (who are presumably linked by contract with the airline) do not have a right to a refund.This is the Ryanair page - they make it clear:"All non-EU/EEA citizens must have their travel documents checked and stamped at the Ryanair Visa/Document check desk before going through airport security."My son's wife is Japanese so they have to do this every time they travel internationally on any airline.For those wondering when this came in it was the coalition in 2015:0 -
TELLIT01 said:Voyager2002 said:nadsat said:Voyager2002 said:Ryanair T and Cs are written in terms of arrival at the departure gate, so their "get lost" response is technically correct. However, they failed to perform the visa check, something that was an essential part of the service for which you had paid. A chargeback would probably succeed, but then you would be blacklisted by Ryanair.
Be clear whether the visa check should have been performed by Ryanair or by the airport, and the precise reason why it was "hopeless".
So Ryanair failed to provide the service for which they had paid. When you (they) contacted Ryanair, what exactly was the excuse for this?It may have escaped your notice but there was a massive world wide IT systems problem on Friday. Anybody who did join a check in queue had to be processed manually. That delay is beyond the control of the airlines. Ryanair may or may not be able to hide behind that. I'm sure there will be details somewhere of what has to be refunded and what doesn't.I would suspect Ryanair's take on it will be that the passenger didn't allow enough time for the visa checks to be carried out, therefore no entitlement. (I'm just playing Devil's Advocate). The fact that many IT systems weren't available and Ryanair may not have been able to check anyway may be a counter argument to that.
I'd argue that a global system outage would likely be extraordinary circumstance in any event. It's 5am here, but I'll be happy to confirm later today exactly which part of legislation would be applicable (if any).
I'd also argue that there's a possibility that not enough time was left. I believe the cutoff is strictly 40 minutes with Ryanair, with latest arrival at the gate of 30 minutes before, however I will confirm this later also. 10 minutes is fine at some airports, but definitely not at an airport like Stansted (where I always seem to go from the 50s for some reason, anyone who knows the airport will know what I mean here).💙💛 💔0 -
CKhalvashi said:TELLIT01 said:Voyager2002 said:nadsat said:Voyager2002 said:Ryanair T and Cs are written in terms of arrival at the departure gate, so their "get lost" response is technically correct. However, they failed to perform the visa check, something that was an essential part of the service for which you had paid. A chargeback would probably succeed, but then you would be blacklisted by Ryanair.
Be clear whether the visa check should have been performed by Ryanair or by the airport, and the precise reason why it was "hopeless".
So Ryanair failed to provide the service for which they had paid. When you (they) contacted Ryanair, what exactly was the excuse for this?It may have escaped your notice but there was a massive world wide IT systems problem on Friday. Anybody who did join a check in queue had to be processed manually. That delay is beyond the control of the airlines. Ryanair may or may not be able to hide behind that. I'm sure there will be details somewhere of what has to be refunded and what doesn't.I would suspect Ryanair's take on it will be that the passenger didn't allow enough time for the visa checks to be carried out, therefore no entitlement. (I'm just playing Devil's Advocate). The fact that many IT systems weren't available and Ryanair may not have been able to check anyway may be a counter argument to that.
I'd argue that a global system outage would likely be extraordinary circumstance in any event. It's 5am here, but I'll be happy to confirm later today exactly which part of legislation would be applicable (if any).
I'd also argue that there's a possibility that not enough time was left. I believe the cutoff is strictly 40 minutes with Ryanair, with latest arrival at the gate of 30 minutes before, however I will confirm this later also. 10 minutes is fine at some airports, but definitely not at an airport like Stansted (where I always seem to go from the 50s for some reason, anyone who knows the airport will know what I mean here).
We don't know about the timings.0 -
Handling agents contracted by the airline, and the functions they undertake would be treated the same as airline staff and functions for the purposes of EC261.
This situation here is that a passenger arrived for their flight in good time and as instructed by the airline for a document check. Due to the IT outage that document check was unable to take place, in spite of the fact the pax presented to airline staff (or third party handling agent staff acting on behalf of the airline). Without the document check the pax couldn't board the flight.
I can almost see an argument for denied boarding. That said, clearly that the IT outages are extraordinary circumstances which get the airlines off the hook for most compensation claims. However given the passenger was unable to board through not fault of their own, I'd say a refund is due.
For the airline to dismiss it as no-show is disingenuous. But getting that explained to someone at Ryanair and making them act on it is not going to be easy....
0 -
I’m a bit confused. Every checkin desk at STN can do visa check, they don’t have a dedicated desk there.And as of the 12th of this month you are advised to validate your passport on the App, which is what I did last week. Works a treat and now issues you with a boarding card, what a godsendThe common law of business balance prohibits paying a little and getting a lot. If you deal with the lowest bidder, it is well to add something for the risk you run, and if you do that you will have enough to pay for something better.0
-
bagand96 said:Handling agents contracted by the airline, and the functions they undertake would be treated the same as airline staff and functions for the purposes of EC261.
This situation here is that a passenger arrived for their flight in good time and as instructed by the airline for a document check. Due to the IT outage that document check was unable to take place, in spite of the fact the pax presented to airline staff (or third party handling agent staff acting on behalf of the airline). Without the document check the pax couldn't board the flight.
I can almost see an argument for denied boarding. That said, clearly that the IT outages are extraordinary circumstances which get the airlines off the hook for most compensation claims. However given the passenger was unable to board through not fault of their own, I'd say a refund is due.
For the airline to dismiss it as no-show is disingenuous. But getting that explained to someone at Ryanair and making them act on it is not going to be easy....The common law of business balance prohibits paying a little and getting a lot. If you deal with the lowest bidder, it is well to add something for the risk you run, and if you do that you will have enough to pay for something better.0 -
stoneman said:bagand96 said:Handling agents contracted by the airline, and the functions they undertake would be treated the same as airline staff and functions for the purposes of EC261.
This situation here is that a passenger arrived for their flight in good time and as instructed by the airline for a document check. Due to the IT outage that document check was unable to take place, in spite of the fact the pax presented to airline staff (or third party handling agent staff acting on behalf of the airline). Without the document check the pax couldn't board the flight.
I can almost see an argument for denied boarding. That said, clearly that the IT outages are extraordinary circumstances which get the airlines off the hook for most compensation claims. However given the passenger was unable to board through not fault of their own, I'd say a refund is due.
For the airline to dismiss it as no-show is disingenuous. But getting that explained to someone at Ryanair and making them act on it is not going to be easy....
💙💛 💔1 -
stoneman said:I’m a bit confused. Every checkin desk at STN can do visa check, they don’t have a dedicated desk there.And as of the 12th of this month you are advised to validate your passport on the App, which is what I did last week. Works a treat and now issues you with a boarding card, what a godsend
https://help.ryanair.com/hc/en-gb/categories/12488813755537-Check-In-Travel-Documents#:~:text=All non-EU/EEA citizens with a restricted boarding pass,the airport prior to departure.I am a non-EU/EEA citizen and need to complete a visa check. How do I do this?All non-EU/EEA citizens must have their travel documents checked and stamped at the Ryanair Visa/Document check desk before going through airport security. Your boarding pass will display the information for routes that require mandatory Visa/Document checks.
Non-EU/EEA citizens must do this to ensure compliance with immigration authority rules. We reserve the right to refuse travel if there is any failure to comply with this requirement.
Citizens of the United States, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand may complete passport verification during the check-in process via our app instead of at the visa check desk. To use this service, ensure your passport is:
- Valid for at least 6 months beyond your intended stay for flights from Schengen to Non-Schengen regions.
- Valid for at least 3 months beyond your intended stay for flights within Schengen regions.
However, if the passport verification process is not available, you must proceed to the visa check desk at the airport.
If you have been denied boarding and require clarification, please return to the visa check desk at the airport. The ticket desk agent will contact the Ryanair Immigration Department for further assistance.
0 -
Yes, as I said this is a policy introduced by the coalition government in 2015. It means a lot of people on visas can't get boarding passes before going to the airport - they can only be issued by the airline after a document check in person at the airport.My son has lodged a complaint with on the Aviation Dispute Resolution site, and Amex has first advised he try reclaiming all costs with the travel insurer, AXA. Failing that he is cross enough to ask Amex for a chargeback against Ryanair for the flights but will have no recourse on the hotel and booked excursions.1
-
It's pretty reasonable for a check to ensure the passenger intends to exit or otherwise has permission to enter for a reasonably time unlimited purpose.
I've had to show proof of onward flight several times on boarding in the past, with my condition of stay being 30 days visa free per visit as long as arriving and departing at a specific airport.
The answer was always 'to London' (normally when boarding at Vilnius on a one way Vilnius-London with the trip length between the two), 'to Warsaw' (on a LOT ticket) or 'back here' (when stopping in either Vilnius or Kyiv on the way back), so fairly standard.
It stops those with no right to enter from boarding and protects the airline from fines, so works all around.
In any event, the requirement is a Ryanair one in many cases instead of being an international one, and is one of the few areas where Ryanair are stricter than laws require. The absurdity of OH having to be checked to go to a country she holds a passport for proves this.💙💛 💔0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards