Court Claim Received from HX & Gladstones

Le_Kirk

Coupon-mad said:

Looks good.

Needs all mentions of 'the Defendant' changed to "I" and I wouldn't have an American Z in 'recognised'.

And it must be no more than 50 pages so maybe remove a few of the older 'strike out' judgments (NOT removing Chan or Akande!).

The link to Chan and Akande only is Chan_Akande

1505grandad

I see you have deleted the Napier signs from your WS  -  so why did you include them and where did you get them from?

Worzel_

1505grandad said:

I see you have deleted the Napier signs from your WS  -  so why did you include them and where did you get them from?

imulsion's WS

Coupon-mad

Worzel_ said:

By1505grandad said:

I see you have deleted the Napier signs from your WS  -  so why did you include them and where did you get them from?

imulsion's WS

But they must only relate to @imulsion's case?

Worzel_

Coupon-mad said:

Worzel_ said:

By1505grandad said:

I see you have deleted the Napier signs from your WS  -  so why did you include them and where did you get them from?

imulsion's WS

But they must only relate to @imulsion's case?

Yes I've removed them now.

Worzel_

Lost my case today. The judge did remove £60 or so of excess costs but I'm liable to pay £214.

I'm not really a user of credit so was considering just taking a CCJ. But the only thing it could impact me on is the price of car insurance, does anyone know if it really affects that?

Coupon-mad

Worzel_ said:

Lost my case today. The judge did remove £60 or so of excess costs but I'm liable to pay £214.

I'm not really a user of credit so was considering just taking a CCJ. But the only thing it could impact me on is the price of car insurance, does anyone know if it really affects that?

Oh, bad luck - but at least £214 has cost them money (no profit there after factoring in court fees) and isn't much more - for you - than the £160 debt demands that they presumably bombarded you with.

Strange for a Judge not to be persuaded by Chan and Akande. Gladstones claims do breach Part 16 so that argument should have been persuasive.

It only affects your car insurance in that it would mean you'd have to pay annually and couldn't do it by monthly credit. I usually pay annually and the price is the same or cheaper.

Worzel_

Thanks. Ah I was wondering if car insurance firms see it on a soft credit check and then of course you look like a risk-taker type and they may quote you higher.

The judge really just disregarded much of it calling it "the technical parts of your defence" and focused in on did the driver pay. I got a difference judge to the one who previously struck out the claim.

Worzel_

At the hearing I was told I will owe £214 and some pennies I can't recall. Will I be sent a bill or otherwise payment instructions? I was told I had 14 days to pay.

Coupon-mad

Worzel_ said:

At the hearing I was told I will owe £214 and some pennies I can't recall. Will I be sent a bill or otherwise payment instructions? I was told I had 14 days to pay.

No bill. Phone up the solicitor or pay on their portal online.