Claim form from ParkingEye from Northampton business county court.

LDast

So, you still need to know why the claim stay was lifted. There is no excuse for not informing the parties to the claim of what is going on, whether it is a CNBC screw up or anything else.

Abzg2k19

LDast said:

So, you still need to know why the claim stay was lifted. There is no excuse for not informing the parties to the claim of what is going on, whether it is a CNBC screw up or anything else.

Okay i will get her to ring CNBC tommorow.

Coupon-mad

I wouldn't bother. Really not needed.  The case is back on track and it was clearly a typical CNBC error.  No application was made.

And that reply to defence is the normal template seen in all recent ParkingEye claims. Everything is as expected.

Mediation (a waste of time phone call with a clueless non-legally trained bully) is now compulsory, so search the forum to learn about that @Abzg2k19 because she needs to know NOT TO OFFER SETTLEMENT.

Abzg2k19

Coupon-mad said:

I wouldn't bother. Really not needed.  The case is back on track and it was clearly a typical CNBC error.  No application was made.

And that reply to defence is the normal template seen in all recent ParkingEye claims. Everything is as expected.

Mediation (a waste of time phone call with a clueless non-legally trained bully) is now compulsory, so search the forum to learn about that @Abzg2k19 because she needs to know NOT TO OFFER SETTLEMENT.

We thought on The DQ you can reject mediation and get a case hearing have they just recently changed?

KeithP

Abzg2k19 said:
We thought on The DQ you can reject mediation and get a case hearing have they just recently changed?

Yes they have.

Coupon-mad

Abzg2k19 said:

Coupon-mad said:

I wouldn't bother. Really not needed.  The case is back on track and it was clearly a typical CNBC error.  No application was made.

And that reply to defence is the normal template seen in all recent ParkingEye claims. Everything is as expected.

Mediation (a waste of time phone call with a clueless non-legally trained bully) is now compulsory, so search the forum to learn about that @Abzg2k19 because she needs to know NOT TO OFFER SETTLEMENT.

We thought on The DQ you can reject mediation and get a case hearing have they just recently changed?

As I said, it's now compulsory.

This changed recently and how to handle & get past it is in the first 12 steps in the Template Defence thread (and what to say on the Mediation call has been discussed on every case at your stage since June),

Abzg2k19

Hi so its been a year but we still have not heard back from CNBC since last year when the stay case was lifted so was woundering if we should email CNBC to see what is happening about the case

Coupon-mad

Abzg2k19 said:

This is the claim form  

My mother has yet again received a claim form from ParkingEye so my father was driving in luton and because of a emergency he ended up stopping in chiltern hotel in Luton but didn't realise he had to put in the registration before exiting so my mother who is the registered keeper has recieved the claims form.

Abzg2k19 said:

Hi so its been a year but we still have not heard back from CNBC since last year when the stay case was lifted so was woundering if we should email CNBC to see what is happening about the case

No.

As long as you haven't moved house then I would not wake the sleeping lion! ParkingEye appear to have forgotten about your case.

We hope while your case is quiet that you and your family can find time to respond with us to the Public Consultation, which is now open for August.

What parking operators do is is a national disgrace and a drain on Society, in terms of money and anxiety. To be part of the push to change things in future, it's very important that people like you (AND YOUR PARENTS!) tell the Government that:

a) motorists have no faith in POPLA or the IAS and that there must be a SINGLE APPEALS SERVICE that people trust. The sector is crying out for an independent and impartial appeals service - not two involved in a race to the bottom - that will give a real option to resolve disputed cases out of court. 

b).  THE ENRICHMENT OF 'DEBT RECOVERY FEES' MUST BE COMPLETELY BANNED. CASES ARE NOT SOLVED BY DEMANDING MORE MONEY.

Whilst ParkingEye 'only' added £25 this was NOT on the signs nor on their PCN so it isn't a contractual fee, doesn't act as a deterrent and comes too late. There is no legitimate interest in just slapping on £25 (nor even a fiver) at Letter before Claim stage as PEye did. Far too late. It's purpose is purely to bump up the claim amount snd yet they are already claiming the full £50 capped legal fees. They can't have both.

Responses are invited to the Consultation now:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6617396/parking-code-of-practice-consultation-8-weeks-from-11th-july-2025/p1

IWe will discuss it further next week on that thread if you want more focus.